Literature DB >> 190908

Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors.

S A Feig, G S Shaber, A Patchefsky, G F Schwartz, J Edeiken, H I Libshitz, R Nerlinger, R F Curley, J D Wallace.   

Abstract

Findings by xeromammography and clinical examination were compared in 16,000 self-selected women aged 45-64 who participated in a voluntary breast cancer screening program. A total of 138 malignancies were detected: 108 (78%) by mammography and 78 (57%) by clinical examination. Mammography was more effective for large breasts, fatty breasts, and in older women. Conversely, clinical examination was more effective for small breasts, dense breasts, and retroareolar lesions. Clinical detection decreased strikingly for lesions with negative lymph nodes, in situ and microinvasive lesions, deeply situated lesions, and lesions where microcalcifications were the sole mammographic finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 190908     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.128.3.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  19 in total

1.  High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.

Authors:  Xin Qian; Andrew Tucker; Emily Gidcumb; Jing Shan; Guang Yang; Xiomara Calderon-Colon; Shabana Sultana; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Derrek Spronk; Frank Sprenger; Yiheng Zhang; Don Kennedy; Tom Farbizio; Zhenxue Jing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quantification of Microvascular Tortuosity during Tumor Evolution Using Acoustic Angiography.

Authors:  Sarah E Shelton; Yueh Z Lee; Mike Lee; Emmanuel Cherin; F Stuart Foster; Stephen R Aylward; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses.

Authors:  Wei T Yang; Chao-Jen Lai; Gary J Whitman; William A Murphy; Mark J Dryden; Anne C Kushwaha; Aysegul A Sahin; Dennis Johnston; Peter J Dempsey; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction for improved microcalcification detection in breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mini Das; Howard C Gifford; J Michael O'Connor; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Evaluation of position-estimation methods applied to CZT-based photon-counting detectors for dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Andrey Makeev; Martin Clajus; Scott Snyder; Xiaolang Wang; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-04-28

6.  Evaluating palpable breast lumps with negative mammography.

Authors:  J H Leversee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-02

7.  Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mini Das; Howard C Gifford; J Michael O'Connor; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Breast conservation for mammographically occult carcinoma.

Authors:  M Morrow; R A Schmidt; C Bucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Predictors of recurrence in stage I (T1N0M0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P P Rosen; P E Saigo; D W Braun; E Weathers; A DePalo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.