Literature DB >> 26156722

Has a patient type with peri-prosthetic femoral fractures evolved?

Matthieu Ehlinger1, David Bahlau, Michel Rahme, Philippe Adam, François Bonnomet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Peri-prosthetic fractures (PPF) have been showing a constant increase. The typical patient described in the SOFCOT symposium in 2005 with PPF was an elderly 77-year-old woman with hip athroplasty (HA). The purpose of this study was to actualize the characteristics of this population. Our hypothesis is that patient type remains a female, but much older, with an equal distribution between HA and knee arthroplasty (KA).
METHODS: All cases of PPF were retrospectively gathered during an 18 month period. Besides regular epidemiologic data, we noted autonomy level (Parker, Devane), residence and dependence (Katz), the type of implant, of fracture, the severity of fracture, the onset and the state of solidity of the prosthesis.
RESULTS: The series consisted of 81 patients (58 F, 23 M) (81 fractures), mean age of 82.2 years; 3.5% of them were admits from the emergency admits; and 69.1% lived at home. Parker's mean score was 4.6, Devane's mean score was 1.8 and Katz's mean score was 4.2. There were totals of 46 HA fractures and 39 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) of which four were inter-prosthetic and three were either KA or proximal osteosynthesis. Onset before fracture for HA was 12.1 years, 7.9 years for KA, and 10.2 years for all series. Patients were younger for HA (80.8 years) than for KA (84.1 years). The fracture was mostly noticed in the third proximal (49.4%), spiral segment (44.5%) and around the implant, while 34.8% of loosening was observed for HA versus 7.7% for KA. DISCUSSION-
CONCLUSION: The patient type has evolved confirming our hypothesis: they are always a female more than 82 years old with a number of fractures on KA similar to that of HA. The patients lived at home, had some autonomy, were somewhat independent in their daily activities but sedentary. Fractures were mostly on the third proximal femur, spiral segment and around the implant. PPF remains rare and a theoretical increase is yet to be confirmed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: prospective study type IV, cohort study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156722     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2873-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.

Authors:  S KATZ; A B FORD; R W MOSKOWITZ; B A JACKSON; M W JAFFE
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1963-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  [Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 1970].

Authors:  R Merle D'Aubigné
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.

Authors:  D G Lewallen; D J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

4.  Primary cementless hip arthroplasty as a potential risk factor for non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Marc Michel; Marcus Hofbauer; Patrick Platzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

6.  A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  M J Parker; C R Palmer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

7.  The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  R M D Meek; T Norwood; R Smith; I J Brenkel; C R Howie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

8.  Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99.

Authors:  O Furnes; S A Lie; B Espehaug; S E Vollset; L B Engesaeter; L I Havelin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-05

9.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population.

Authors:  C Delaunay; J-A Epinette; J Dawson; D Murray; B-M Jolles
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.256

View more
  4 in total

1.  Periprosthetic fractures and complicated arthroplasties.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Luis Lopez-Duran Stern
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The use of megaprosthesis in the treatment of periprosthetic knee fractures.

Authors:  Stephen Robert Cannon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Periprosthetic fractures: concepts of biomechanical in vitro investigations.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Still no single gold standard for using cementless femoral stems routinely in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps; John A Scanelli
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-09-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.