Literature DB >> 26156676

Effect of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Field of View and Acquisition Frame on the Detection of Chemically Simulated Peri-Implant Bone Loss In Vitro.

Lucas Rodrigues Pinheiro1,2, William C Scarfe1, Marcelo Augusto de Oliveira Sales2, Bruno Felipe Gaia2, Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes3, Marcelo Gusmão Cavalcanti2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the influence of field of view (FOV) and number of acquisition projection images (frames) on the detection of chemically simulated peri-implant defects by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro bovine rib bone model.
METHODS: Eighty implants were placed in bovine ribs in which small and large bone defects were created using 70% perchloric acid. CBCT images were acquired at three acquisition protocols: protocol 1 (FOV 4 × 4 cm, 0.08-mm voxel size, 1,009 frames [high fidelity]; protocol 2 (same as protocol 1 except 512 frames [standard]); and protocol 3 (FOV 14 × 5 cm, 0.25-mm voxel size; high fidelity). Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMRs) and two oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) rated the presence or absence of bone defects on a five-point scale. κ and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared using analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test at P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: Intra- and interobserver agreement for OMRs ranged from moderate to good and from slight to moderate for OMSs. For the detection of small lesions, protocol 1 (AUC 0.813 ± 0.045) provided higher detection rates than protocol 2 (AUC 0.703 ± 0.02) and protocol 3 (AUC 0.773 ± 0.55) [F(2,9) = 1.6377]. For larger defects, the trends were similar, with protocol 1 (AUC 0.852 ± 0.108) providing higher detection rates than protocol 2 (AUC 0.730 ± 0.045) and protocol 3 (AUC 0.783 ± 0.058) [F(2,9) = 1.9576].
CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, optimal detection of chemically simulated pericircumferential implant crestal bone defects is achieved at the least radiation detriment using the smallest FOV, the highest number of acquisition frames, and the smallest voxel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal; bone and bones; cone-beam computed tomography; dental implants; diagnosis; peri-implantitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156676     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.150223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  7 in total

Review 1.  Radiographic diagnosis of root fractures: a systematic review, meta-analyses and sources of heterogeneity.

Authors:  Fernanda Cristina Sales Salineiro; Solange Kobayashi-Velasco; Mariana Minatel Braga; Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Detection of furcation involvement using periapical radiography and 2 cone-beam computed tomography imaging protocols with and without a metallic post: An animal study.

Authors:  Fernanda Cristina Sales Salineiro; Ivan Onone Gialain; Solange Kobayashi-Velasco; Claudio Mendes Pannuti; Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-03-21

3.  Comparison between different cone-beam computed tomography devices in the detection of mechanically simulated peri-implant bone defects.

Authors:  Jun Ho Kim; Reinaldo Abdala-Júnior; Luciana Munhoz; Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes; Plauto Christopher Aranha Watanabe; Claudio Costa; Emiko Saito Arita
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 4.  Etiology and Measurement of Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss (CBL).

Authors:  Adrien Naveau; Kouhei Shinmyouzu; Colman Moore; Limor Avivi-Arber; Jesse Jokerst; Sreenivas Koka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Detection of peri-implant bone defects using cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography with parallel and oblique projection.

Authors:  Bardia Vadiati Saberi; Negar Khosravifard; Farnaz Ghandari; Arash Hadinezhad
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of imaging examinations for peri-implant bone defects around titanium and zirconium dioxide implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mariana Murai Chagas; Solange Kobayashi-Velasco; Thais Gimenez; Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-11-18

7.  Intra- and inter-observer agreements in detecting peri-implant bone defects between periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: A clinical study.

Authors:  Chu-Nan Zhang; Yu Zhu; Lin-Feng Fan; Xiao Zhang; Yin-Hua Jiang; Ying-Xin Gu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 2.080

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.