Literature DB >> 26156311

Transbronchial Catheter Aspiration and Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in the Diagnostic Workup of Peripheral Lung Lesions.

Karl-Josef Franke1, Melanie Hein2, Ulrike Domanski3, Georg Nilius4, Maik Schroeder5, Jeremias Wohlschlaeger6,7, Dirk Theegarten8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Increasingly frequent, it is clinically indicated to obtain tissue from a peripheral lung lesion (PLL) to yield a pathological diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and transbronchial catheter aspiration (TBCA) in addition to transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBB) at conventional bronchoscopy.
METHODS: Eligible patients showing a PLL on computed tomography scans were included in the study. In all patients, following TBB, TBNA and TBCA were employed in randomised order under fluoroscopy.
RESULTS: Fourty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 46 patients with 46 PLLs were included in the analysis. The mean ± SD diameter of the PLL was 27.0 ± 13.3 mm. The overall sensitivity for all modalities was 69.6%; PLL ≤20 or >20 and ≤30 mm in diameter showed a sensitivity of 60.0 and 72.2%, respectively. For malignant PLL (n = 33), the combined sensitivity of TBNA + TBCA versus TBB was significantly higher (63.6 vs. 33.3%, p ≤ 0.05), and could not further be improved by TBB. For benign PLL, TBB was superior to TBNA + TBCA (76.9 vs. 38.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: TBB, TBNA and TBCA are complementary to one another. Combining the three techniques, even allows transbronchial specimen collection of PLL <3 cm in diameter at conventional bronchoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bronchoscopy; Lung cancer; Peripheral lung lesion; Transbronchial catheter aspiration; Transbronchial forceps biopsy; Transbronchial needle aspiration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156311     DOI: 10.1007/s00408-015-9763-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung        ISSN: 0341-2040            Impact factor:   2.584


  28 in total

1.  The role of conventional bronchoscopy in the workup of suspicious CT scan screen-detected pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Susan C van 't Westeinde; Nanda Horeweg; René M Vernhout; Harry J M Groen; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Carla Weenink; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Matthijs Oudkerk; Willem Mali; Frederik B Thunnissen; Harry J de Koning; Rob J van Klaveren
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Multimodality bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ralf Eberhardt; Devanand Anantham; Armin Ernst; David Feller-Kopman; Felix Herth
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of peripheral, primary lung cancer.

Authors:  M Pirozynski
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules less than 20 mm.

Authors:  R Eberhardt; A Ernst; F J F Herth
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.671

5.  The value of transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions.

Authors:  F Reichenberger; J Weber; M Tamm; C T Bolliger; P Dalquen; A P Perruchoud; M Solèr
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Value of washings and brushings at fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  V H Mak; I D Johnston; M R Hetzel; C Grubb
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Diagnostic, morphologic, and histopathologic correlates in bronchogenic carcinoma. A review of 1,045 bronchoscopic examinations.

Authors:  G Buccheri; P Barberis; M S Delfino
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 8.  Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D P Steinfort; Y H Khor; R L Manser; L B Irving
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  W A Baaklini; M A Reinoso; A B Gorin; A Sharafkaneh; P Manian
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobronchial ultrasound to diagnose small peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Takashi Ishida; Fumihiro Asano; Koichi Yamazaki; Naofumi Shinagawa; Satoshi Oizumi; Hiroshi Moriya; Mitsuru Munakata; Masaharu Nishimura
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy: Where Are We Now? Five Years of a Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Filippo Patrucco; Francesco Gavelli; Matteo Daverio; Cleto Antonini; Renzo Boldorini; Caterina Casadio; Piero E Balbo
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  The Impact of Biopsy Tool Choice and Rapid On-Site Evaluation on Diagnostic Accuracy for Malignant Lesions in the Prospective: Multicenter NAVIGATE Study.

Authors:  Thomas R Gildea; Erik E Folch; Sandeep J Khandhar; Michael A Pritchett; Gregory P LeMense; Philip A Linden; Douglas A Arenberg; Otis B Rickman; Amit K Mahajan; Jaspal Singh; Joseph Cicenia; Atul C Mehta; Haiying Lin; Jennifer S Mattingley
Journal:  J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol       Date:  2021-07-01

3.  Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound assisted conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solitary peribronchial pulmonary lesion located in the segmental bronchi.

Authors:  Zhiang Huang; Haidong Huang; Yunye Ning; Jin Han; Yibo Shen; Hui Shi; Qin Wang; Chong Bai; Qiang Li; Simoff Michael; Paul Zarogoulidis; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Fotis Konstantinou; J Francis Turner; Charilaos Koulouris; Athanasios Katsaounis; Aikaterini Amaniti; Stylianos Mantalovas; Efstathios Pavlidis; Dimitrios Giannakidis; Ioannis Passos; Nikolaos Michalopoulos; Christoforos Kosmidis; Stelian Ştefăniţă Mogoantă; Konstantinos Sapalidis
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.