Literature DB >> 26156132

The influence of preceding dive cycles on the foraging decisions of Antarctic fur seals.

T Iwata, K Q Sakamoto, E W J Edwards, I J Staniland, P N Trathan, Y Goto, K Sato, Y Naito, A Takahashi.   

Abstract

The foraging strategy of many animals is thought to be determined by their past experiences. However, few empirical studies have investigated whether this is true in diving animals. We recorded three-dimensional movements and mouth-opening events from three Antarctic fur seals during their foraging trips to examine how they adapt their behaviour based on past experience--continuing to search for prey in the same area or moving to search in a different place. Each dive cycle was divided into a transit phase and a feeding phase. The linear horizontal distance travelled after feeding phases in each dive was affected by the mouth-opening rate during the previous 244 s, which typically covered two to three dive cycles. The linear distance travelled tended to be shorter when the mouth-opening rate in the previous 244 s was higher, i.e. seals tended to stay in the same areas with high prey-encounter rates. These results indicate that Antarctic fur seals follow decision-making strategies based on the past foraging experience over time periods longer than the immediately preceding dive.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156132      PMCID: PMC4528440          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  7 in total

1.  Penguin head movement detected using small accelerometers: a proxy of prey encounter rate.

Authors:  Nobuo Kokubun; Jeong-Hoon Kim; Hyoung-Chul Shin; Yasuhiko Naito; Akinori Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Why do macaroni penguins choose shallow body angles that result in longer descent and ascent durations?

Authors:  Katsufumi Sato; Jean-Benoît Charrassin; Charles-André Bost; Yasuhiko Naito
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Hierarchical movement decisions in predators: effects of foraging experience at more than one spatial and temporal scale.

Authors:  Tatsuya Amano; Naoki Katayama
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Supervised accelerometry analysis can identify prey capture by penguins at sea.

Authors:  Gemma Carroll; David Slip; Ian Jonsen; Rob Harcourt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Linking animal-borne video to accelerometers reveals prey capture variability.

Authors:  Yuuki Y Watanabe; Akinori Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Can we predict foraging success in a marine predator from dive patterns only? Validation with prey capture attempt data.

Authors:  Morgane Viviant; Pascal Monestiez; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models.

Authors:  Paul Cd Johnson
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 7.781

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Prey encounters and spatial memory influence use of foraging patches in a marine central place forager.

Authors:  Virginia Iorio-Merlo; Isla M Graham; Rebecca C Hewitt; Geert Aarts; Enrico Pirotta; Gordon D Hastie; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

Authors:  Richard M Gunner; Mark D Holton; David M Scantlebury; Phil Hopkins; Emily L C Shepard; Adam J Fell; Baptiste Garde; Flavio Quintana; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Ken Yoda; Takashi Yamamoto; Holly English; Sam Ferreira; Danny Govender; Pauli Viljoen; Angela Bruns; O Louis van Schalkwyk; Nik C Cole; Vikash Tatayah; Luca Börger; James Redcliffe; Stephen H Bell; Nikki J Marks; Nigel C Bennett; Mariano H Tonini; Hannah J Williams; Carlos M Duarte; Martin C van Rooyen; Mads F Bertelsen; Craig J Tambling; Rory P Wilson
Journal:  Anim Biotelemetry       Date:  2021-10-16

3.  Similar circling movements observed across marine megafauna taxa.

Authors:  Tomoko Narazaki; Itsumi Nakamura; Kagari Aoki; Takashi Iwata; Kozue Shiomi; Paolo Luschi; Hiroyuki Suganuma; Carl G Meyer; Rui Matsumoto; Charles A Bost; Yves Handrich; Masao Amano; Ryosuke Okamoto; Kyoichi Mori; Stéphane Ciccione; Jérôme Bourjea; Katsufumi Sato
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-03-18

4.  Dive characteristics can predict foraging success in Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) as validated by animal-borne video.

Authors:  Beth L Volpov; David A S Rosen; Andrew J Hoskins; Holly J Lourie; Nicole Dorville; Alastair M M Baylis; Kathryn E Wheatley; Greg Marshall; Kyler Abernathy; Jayson Semmens; Mark A Hindell; John P Y Arnould
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.422

5.  How Elephant Seals (Mirounga leonina) Adjust Their Fine Scale Horizontal Movement and Diving Behaviour in Relation to Prey Encounter Rate.

Authors:  Yves Le Bras; Joffrey Jouma'a; Baptiste Picard; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.