Literature DB >> 35232237

Prey encounters and spatial memory influence use of foraging patches in a marine central place forager.

Virginia Iorio-Merlo1, Isla M Graham1, Rebecca C Hewitt1, Geert Aarts2,3, Enrico Pirotta4,5, Gordon D Hastie6, Paul M Thompson1.   

Abstract

Given the patchiness and long-term predictability of marine resources, memory of high-quality foraging grounds is expected to provide fitness advantages for central place foragers. However, it remains challenging to characterize how marine predators integrate memory with recent prey encounters to adjust fine-scale movement and use of foraging patches. Here, we used two months of movement data from harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) to quantify the repeatability in foraging patches as a proxy for memory. We then integrated these data into analyses of fine-scale movement and underwater behaviour to test how both spatial memory and prey encounter rates influenced the seals' area-restricted search (ARS) behaviour. Specifically, we used one month's GPS data from 29 individuals to build spatial memory maps of searched areas and archived accelerometery data from a subset of five individuals to detect prey catch attempts, a proxy for prey encounters. Individuals were highly consistent in the areas they visited over two consecutive months. Hidden Markov models showed that both spatial memory and prey encounters increased the probability of seals initiating ARS. These results provide evidence that predators use memory to adjust their fine-scale movement, and this ability should be accounted for in movement models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hidden Markov Model; accelerometer; area-restricted search; harbour seals; repeatability; spatial memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35232237      PMCID: PMC8889173          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  40 in total

1.  Spatial memory and animal movement.

Authors:  William F Fagan; Mark A Lewis; Marie Auger-Méthé; Tal Avgar; Simon Benhamou; Greg Breed; Lara LaDage; Ulrike E Schlägel; Wen-wu Tang; Yannis P Papastamatiou; James Forester; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.

Authors:  Harry H Marshall; Alecia J Carter; Alexandra Ashford; J Marcus Rowcliffe; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Perceptual Ranges, Information Gathering, and Foraging Success in Dynamic Landscapes.

Authors:  William F Fagan; Eliezer Gurarie; Sharon Bewick; Allison Howard; Robert Stephen Cantrell; Chris Cosner
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Key Questions in Marine Megafauna Movement Ecology.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Luciana C Ferreira; Ana M M Sequeira; Mark G Meekan; Carlos M Duarte; Helen Bailey; Fred Bailleul; W Don Bowen; M Julian Caley; Daniel P Costa; Victor M Eguíluz; Sabrina Fossette; Ari S Friedlaender; Nick Gales; Adrian C Gleiss; John Gunn; Rob Harcourt; Elliott L Hazen; Michael R Heithaus; Michelle Heupel; Kim Holland; Markus Horning; Ian Jonsen; Gerald L Kooyman; Christopher G Lowe; Peter T Madsen; Helene Marsh; Richard A Phillips; David Righton; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Katsufumi Sato; Scott A Shaffer; Colin A Simpfendorfer; David W Sims; Gregory Skomal; Akinori Takahashi; Philip N Trathan; Martin Wikelski; Jamie N Womble; Michele Thums
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Elucidating the significance of spatial memory on movement decisions by African savannah elephants using state-space models.

Authors:  Leo Polansky; Werner Kilian; George Wittemyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program.

Authors:  Ruth J Sharples; Simon E Moss; Toby A Patterson; Philip S Hammond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Return customers: foraging site fidelity and the effect of environmental variability in wide-ranging antarctic fur seals.

Authors:  Benjamin Arthur; Mark Hindell; Marthan Bester; Phil Trathan; Ian Jonsen; Iain Staniland; W Chris Oosthuizen; Mia Wege; Mary-Anne Lea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Understanding the ontogeny of foraging behaviour: insights from combining marine predator bio-logging with satellite-derived oceanography in hidden Markov models.

Authors:  W James Grecian; Jude V Lane; Théo Michelot; Helen M Wade; Keith C Hamer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Processing of acceleration and dive data on-board satellite relay tags to investigate diving and foraging behaviour in free-ranging marine predators.

Authors:  Sam L Cox; Florian Orgeret; Mathieu Gesta; Charles Rodde; Isaac Heizer; Henri Weimerskirch; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.781

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prey encounters and spatial memory influence use of foraging patches in a marine central place forager.

Authors:  Virginia Iorio-Merlo; Isla M Graham; Rebecca C Hewitt; Geert Aarts; Enrico Pirotta; Gordon D Hastie; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Equivalence classification, learning by exclusion, and long-term memory in pinnipeds: cognitive mechanisms demonstrated through research with subjects under human care and in the field.

Authors:  Kristy L Biolsi; Kevin L Woo
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Desert Ants Learn to Avoid Pitfall Traps While Foraging.

Authors:  Adi Bar; Chen Marom; Nikol Zorin; Tomer Gilad; Aziz Subach; Susanne Foitzik; Inon Scharf
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.