Literature DB >> 32496980

Evidence-Based Review of Antibiofilm Agents for Wound Care.

Maximillian A Weigelt1, Stephanie A McNamara1, Daniela Sanchez2, Penelope A Hirt1, Robert S Kirsner1.   

Abstract

Significance: Biofilms in vivo are small densely packed aggregations of microbes that are highly resistant to host immune responses and treatment. They attach to each other and to nearby surfaces. Biofilms are difficult to study and identify in a clinical setting as their quantification necessitates the use of advanced microscopy techniques such as confocal laser scanning microscopy. Nonetheless, it is likely that biofilms contribute to the pathophysiology of chronic skin wounds. Reducing, removing, or preventing biofilms is thus a logical approach to help clinicians heal chronic wounds. Recent Advances: Wound care products have demonstrated varying degrees of efficacy in destroying biofilms in in vitro and preclinical models, as well as in some clinical studies. Critical Issues: Controlled studies exploring the beneficial role of biofilm eradication and its relationship to healing in patients with chronic wounds are limited. This review aims to discuss the mode of action and clinical significance of currently available antibiofilm products, including surfactants, dressings, and others, with a focus on levels of evidence for efficacy in disrupting biofilms and ability to improve wound healing outcomes. Future Directions: Few available products have good evidence to support antibiofilm activity and wound healing benefits. Novel therapeutic strategies are on the horizon. More high-quality clinical studies are needed. The development of noninvasive techniques to quantify biofilms will facilitate increased ease of research about biofilms in wounds and how to combat them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofilm; healing; therapy; treatment; wound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32496980      PMCID: PMC7698998          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2020.1193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  46 in total

1.  Next science wound gel technology, a novel agent that inhibits biofilm development by gram-positive and gram-negative wound pathogens.

Authors:  Kyle G Miller; Phat L Tran; Cecily L Haley; Cassandra Kruzek; Jane A Colmer-Hamood; Matt Myntti; Abdul N Hamood
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.

Authors:  Qingping Yang; Christelle Larose; Alessandra C Della Porta; Gregory S Schultz; Daniel J Gibson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  A cohort study on the efficacy of a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms in wounds.

Authors:  E Lenselink; A Andriessen
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.072

4.  Clinical Assessment of a Biofilm-disrupting Agent for the Management of Chronic Wounds Compared With Standard of Care: A Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; William Namen Ii; January Moore; Mauricia Buchanan; Valerie Hayes; Matthew F Myntti; Albert Hakaim
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 1.546

5.  Demonstration of a microcurrent-generating wound care device for wound healing within a rehabilitation center patient population.

Authors:  Emily Whitcomb; Nina Monroe; Jennifer Hope-Higman; Penny Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2013-07-12

Review 6.  Consensus guidelines for the identification and treatment of biofilms in chronic nonhealing wounds.

Authors:  Gregory Schultz; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Garth A James; David J Leaper; Andrew J McBain; Matthew Malone; Paul Stoodley; Theresa Swanson; Masahiro Tachi; Randall D Wolcott
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Silver-zinc redox-coupled electroceutical wound dressing disrupts bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  Jaideep Banerjee; Piya Das Ghatak; Sashwati Roy; Savita Khanna; Craig Hemann; Binbin Deng; Amitava Das; Jay L Zweier; Daniel Wozniak; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Blue laser light inhibits biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo by inducing oxidative stress.

Authors:  Katia Rupel; Luisa Zupin; Giulia Ottaviani; Iris Bertani; Valentina Martinelli; Davide Porrelli; Simone Vodret; Roman Vuerich; Daniel Passos da Silva; Rossana Bussani; Sergio Crovella; Matthew Parsek; Vittorio Venturi; Roberto Di Lenarda; Matteo Biasotto; Serena Zacchigna
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 7.290

9.  Cadexomer iodine effectively reduces bacterial biofilm in porcine wounds ex vivo and in vivo.

Authors:  Eric D Roche; Emma J Woodmansey; Qingping Yang; Daniel J Gibson; Hongen Zhang; Gregory S Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  Current Status of In Vitro Models and Assays for Susceptibility Testing for Wound Biofilm Infections.

Authors:  Tania F Bahamondez-Canas; Lara A Heersema; Hugh D C Smyth
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2019-04-30
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Advanced Wound Diagnostics: Toward Transforming Wound Care into Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Maximillian A Weigelt; Hadar A Lev-Tov; Marjana Tomic-Canic; W David Lee; Ryan Williams; David Strasfeld; Robert S Kirsner; Ira M Herman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Cytotoxicity and Efficacy in Debris and Smear Layer Removal of HOCl-Based Irrigating Solution: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Goda Bilvinaite; Ruta Zongolaviciute; Saulius Drukteinis; Virginija Bukelskiene; Elisabetta Cotti
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-07-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.