Literature DB >> 18211576

Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.

Stephen C Davis1, Carlos Ricotti, Alex Cazzaniga, Esperanza Welsh, William H Eaglstein, Patricia M Mertz.   

Abstract

A biofilm is a collection of microbial cells that are attached to a surface and embedded in a self-produced extrapolymeric substance. The understanding of the biofilm phenotype is important in the understanding of bacteria in vitro but it has been difficult to translate biofilm science to the clinical setting. More recently, preliminary criteria for defining biofilm associated diseases have been proposed and the purpose of this study was to create a biofilm-associated wound model based on these criteria. Using a porcine model, partial thickness wounds were inoculated with a wound isolate Staphylococcus aureus strain. Wounds were then treated with either one of two topical antimicrobial agents (mupriocin cream or triple antibiotic ointment) within 15 minutes to represent planktonic bacteria or 48 hours after initial inoculation to represent biofilm-associated wound infection. Using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy, we were able to observe biofilm-like structures in wounds after 48 hours of inoculation and occlusion. The in vivo antimicrobial assay was used to demonstrate that both mupirocin cream and the triple antibiotic ointment were effective in reducing planktonic S. aureus but had reduced efficacy against biofilm-embedded S. aureus. Our results demonstrated that S. aureus form firmly attached microcolonies and colonies of bacteria encased in an extracellular matrix on the surface of the wounds. These biofilm-like communities also demonstrated increased antimicrobial resistance when compared with their planktonic phenotype in vivo. The structural and physiological results support the hypothesis that bacterial biofilms play a role in wound colonization and infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211576     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00303.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  95 in total

1.  A PEGylated fibrin hydrogel-based antimicrobial wound dressing controls infection without impeding wound healing.

Authors:  Joel Gil; Shanmugasundaram Natesan; Jie Li; Jose Valdes; Andrew Harding; Michael Solis; Stephen C Davis; Robert J Christy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The visualisation and speed of kill of wound isolates on a silver alginate dressing.

Authors:  Samuel J Hooper; Steven L Percival; Katja E Hill; David W Thomas; A J Hayes; David W Williams
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  In vitro characterization of multivalent adhesion molecule 7-based inhibition of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from wounded military personnel.

Authors:  Anne Marie Krachler; Katrin Mende; Clinton Murray; Kim Orth
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.882

4.  Impact of silver-containing wound dressings on bacterial biofilm viability and susceptibility to antibiotics during prolonged treatment.

Authors:  Victoria Kostenko; Jeffrey Lyczak; Katherine Turner; Robert John Martinuzzi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Phillip C Hochwalt; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: comparing clinical observation and wound swabs.

Authors:  Charne Nicole Miller; Keryln Carville; Nelly Newall; Suzanne Kapp; Gill Lewin; Leila Karimi; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Biofilms: do they affect wound healing?

Authors:  Collette H Thomson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Biofilms and Wounds: An Overview of the Evidence.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Sara M McCarty; Benjamin Lipsky
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Anti-biofilm efficacy of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Evan M Hetrick; Jae Ho Shin; Heather S Paul; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Mixed-species biofilm compromises wound healing by disrupting epidermal barrier function.

Authors:  Sashwati Roy; Haytham Elgharably; Mithun Sinha; Kasturi Ganesh; Sarah Chaney; Ethan Mann; Christina Miller; Savita Khanna; Valerie K Bergdall; Heather M Powell; Charles H Cook; Gayle M Gordillo; Daniel J Wozniak; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 7.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.