Literature DB >> 26154456

Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.

Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida1, Cristina Futagami1, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti2, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro1, Ricardo de Lima Navarro3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare dentoalveolar changes in mandibular arch, regarding transversal measures and buccal bone thickness, in patients undergoing the initial phase of orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional bracket systems.
METHODS: A sample of 25 patients requiring orthodontic treatment was assessed based on the bracket type. Group 1 comprised 13 patients bonded with 0.022-in self-ligating brackets (SLB). Group 2 included 12 patients bonded with 0.022-in conventional brackets (CLB). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and a 3D program (Dolphin) assessed changes in transversal width of buccal bone (TWBB) and buccal bone thickness (BBT) before (T1) and 7 months after treatment onset (T2). Measurements on dental casts were performed using a digital caliper. Differences between and within groups were analyzed by Student's t-test; Pearson correlation coefficient was also calculated.
RESULTS: Significant mandibular expansion was observed for both groups; however, no significant differences were found between groups. There was significant decrease in mandibular buccal bone thickness and transversal width of buccal bone in both groups. There was no significant correlation between buccal bone thickness and dental arch expansion.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets systems regarding mandibular arch expansion and changes in buccal bone thickness or transversal width of buccal bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26154456      PMCID: PMC4520138          DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.050-057.oar

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod        ISSN: 2176-9451


  25 in total

1.  The efficiency of the Russell attachment.

Authors:  J STOLZENBERG
Journal:  Am J Orthod Oral Surg       Date:  1946-10

2.  Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements.

Authors:  Kelly A Misch; Erica S Yi; David P Sarment
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Argy Polychronopoulou; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Self-ligating brackets: present and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Rinchuse; Peter G Miles
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 5.  Self-ligating appliances: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Padhraig S Fleming; Andrew T DiBiase; Robert T Lee
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2008-11

6.  Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paul Scott; Andrew T DiBiase; Martyn Sherriff; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone.

Authors:  A Mol; A Balasundaram
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  [The clinical implication of self-ligating brackets].

Authors:  Yi-li Yu; Yu-fen Qian
Journal:  Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue       Date:  2007-08

9.  The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements.

Authors:  W J Houston
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-05

10.  Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.

Authors:  James K Mah; John C Huang; HyeRan Choo
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  3 in total

1.  Buccal bone defects and transversal tooth movement of mandibular lateral segments in patients after orthodontic treatment with and without piezocision: A case-control retrospective study.

Authors:  Maria Antonia Alvarez; Alejandra Mejia; Daniela Alzate; Diego Rey; Marcos Ioshida; Juan Fernando Aristizabal; Hector F Rios; Wilhelm Bellaiza-Cantillo; Marcela Tirado; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Evaluation of the alignment efficiency of nickel-titanium and copper-nickel-titanium archwires in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment over a 12-week period: A single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Burcu Aydın; Neslihan Ebru Şenışık; Özgür Koşkan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Effect of orthodontic treatment on alveolar bone thickness in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michelle Sendyk; Daniele Sigal Linhares; Claudio Mendes Pannuti; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino Neto
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.