Literature DB >> 17693372

Self-ligating brackets: present and future.

Daniel J Rinchuse1, Peter G Miles.   

Abstract

Recently, there has been a resurgence in the use of self-ligating (SL) brackets, which were introduced in the early 20th century. From a synthesis of both in-vitro and in-vivo evidence-based literature, we present general concepts, principles, and axioms. The references to "active" and "passive" SL brackets are explained and juxtaposed in relation to their perceived advantages and disadvantages. We also present new concepts in regard to the future of SL brackets: combination bracket system, hybrid system, and selective use of SL brackets.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17693372     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  26 in total

1.  Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Cristina Futagami; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Ricardo de Lima Navarro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

2.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Authors:  Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro; Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva; Carlos Nelson Elias; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 3.  Differences between active and passive self-ligating brackets for orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Xianrui Yang; Yiruo He; Tian Chen; Mengyuan Zhao; Yinqiu Yan; Hongzhe Wang; Ding Bai
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

5.  Ceramic brackets and low friction : A possible synergy in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.

Authors:  Matteo Camporesi; Mariana Bulhoes Galvão; André Tortamano; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Nicolò Defraia; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  Xianrui Yang; Chaoran Xue; Yiruo He; Mengyuan Zhao; Mengqi Luo; Peiqi Wang; Ding Bai
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 7.  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.

Authors:  Ales Čelar; Magdalena Schedlberger; Petra Dörfler; Michael Bertl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.

Authors:  Wook Heo; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Authors:  Chase Prettyman; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review.

Authors:  Padhraig S Fleming; Ama Johal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.