Literature DB >> 26153844

Comparison of Guy and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometry Scoring Systems for Predicting Stone-Free Status and Complication Rates After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single Center Study with 437 Cases.

Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt1, Ozgu Aydogdu1, Tarik Yonguc1, Serkan Yarimoglu1, Volkan Sen1, Bulent Gunlusoy1, Tansu Degirmenci1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the Guy and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) scoring systems in predicting postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) stone-free rate and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 437 patients who underwent PCNL for renal stones were included in the recent retrospective study. All stones were evaluated with CT preoperatively. Mean stone diameter was 701.52±510.65 mm(2). Guy and CROES nephrolithometry scores were calculated for each patient, and their correlation with stone-free status, operative and fluoroscopy time, and length of hospital stay was evaluated. Post-PCNL stone status was evaluated with plain radiography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. Postoperative complications were graded according to the modified Clavien classification, and the correlation of both scoring systems with postoperative complications was also investigated.
RESULTS: The mean Guy grade was 2.28±1.12, and the mean CROES score was 196.92±65.89. The overall stone-free rate was 75.1%. There was a significant correlation between the Guy stone score (GSS) and CROES score and stone-free status (P<0.001, P<0.001). Also, both scoring systems were correlated with operative time (P<0.001, P<0.001) and length of hospital stay (P=0.002, P=0.01). The overall complication rate was 34.6%, with most being modified Clavien grade I and grade II. Both scoring systems were significantly correlated with complication rates. Regression analysis showed that both scoring systems were significantly associated with stone-free rates, estimated blood loss (EBL) (>250 mL), and operative time.
CONCLUSION: Both GSS and CROES nomograms had comparable accuracies in predicting post-PCNL stone-free status. Different from the previous reports, our results showed that both nomograms were predictive of overall complications, EBL, and operative time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26153844     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: Which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Piruz Motamedinia; Vincent Bird; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

3.  Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone-scoring systems and preoperative parameters.

Authors:  Sae Woong Choi; Woong Jin Bae; U-Syn Ha; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Wayland J Wu; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update.

Authors:  Linda My Huynh; Erica Huang; Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Does nephrolithometry scoring systems predict success and complications in miniPCNL?

Authors:  Ali Ayranci; Burak Ucpinar; Ufuk Caglar; Metin Savun; Omer Sarilar; Faruk Ozgor
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, guy's stone score and croes nomogram.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini; Felipe R Serzedello; Kay Thomas; Giovanni S Marchini; Fabio C M Torricelli; Miguel Srougi; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Rearrangement of the Guy's stone score improves prediction of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jorge Moreno-Palacios; Oswaldo José Avilés-Ibarra; Enrique García-Peña; Juan Ramón Torres-Anguiano; Eduardo Alonso Serrano-Brambilia; Virgilio Augusto López-Sámano; Efraín Maldonado-Alcaraz
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-01-08

9.  Inter-observer variability amongst surgeons and radiologists in assessment of Guy's Stone Score and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry score: A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Aneesh Srivastava; Priyank Yadav; Kumar Madhavan; Sanjoy K Sureka; Uday P Singh; Rakesh Kapoor; M S Ansari; Hira Lal; Prabhakar Mishra
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-12-18

10.  Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Authors:  Muzaffer Akçay; Muhammed Tosun; Fatih Gevher; Senad Kalkan; Cevper Ersöz; Yunus Kayalı; Abdulkadir Tepeler
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.