Literature DB >> 26152239

Progression of chromosomal damage induced by etoposide in G2 phase in a DNA-PKcs-deficient context.

Micaela Palmitelli1, Marcelo de Campos-Nebel1, Marcela González-Cid2.   

Abstract

Etoposide (ETO), a drug used for the treatment of human tumors, is associated with the development of secondary malignancies. Recently, therapeutic strategies have incorporated chemosensitizing agents to improve the tumoral response to this drug. ETO creates DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) via inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II (Top2). To repair DSB, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), involving D-NHEJ (dependent of the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase, DNA-PKcs) and B-NHEJ (backup repair pathway) are activated. We evaluated the progression of the DNA damage induced by the Top2 poison ETO in G2 phase of human HeLa cells after chemical inhibition of DNA-PKcs with NU7026. Compared to ETO treatment alone, this combined treatment resulted in a twofold higher rate of chromatid breaks and exchanges when analysis was performed in the following metaphase. Moreover, when analysis was performed in the second metaphase following treatment, increases in the percentage of micronuclei with H2AX (biomarker for DSB) foci in binucleated cells and dicentric chromosomes were seen. In post-mitotic G1 phase, a close association between unresolved DSB and meiotic recombination 11 homolog A (MRE11) signals was observed, demonstrating the contribution of MRE11 in the DSB repair by B-NHEJ. Hence, chemical inhibition of DNA-PKcs impaired both D-NHEJ and HR repair pathways, altering the maintenance of chromosomal integrity and cell proliferation. Our results suggest that the chemosensitizing effectiveness of the DNA-PKcs inhibitor and the survival rate of aberrant cells may contribute to the development of therapy-related tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; DNA-PKcs chemical inhibition; DSB repair pathway; G2 phase; Topoisomerase II poison

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26152239     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-015-9478-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  46 in total

1.  Mode of ATM-dependent suppression of chromosome translocation.

Authors:  Motohiro Yamauchi; Keiji Suzuki; Yasuyoshi Oka; Masatoshi Suzuki; Hisayoshi Kondo; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways.

Authors:  Emil Mladenov; George Iliakis
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Sensitivity of Chinese hamster ovary mutants defective in DNA double strand break repair to topoisomerase II inhibitors.

Authors:  P A Jeggo; K Caldecott; S Pidsley; G R Banks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a "cytome" assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death.

Authors:  Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Inhibition of homologous recombination by DNA-dependent protein kinase requires kinase activity, is titratable, and is modulated by autophosphorylation.

Authors:  Jessica A Neal; Van Dang; Pauline Douglas; Marc S Wold; Susan P Lees-Miller; Katheryn Meek
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Up-regulation of WRN and DNA ligase IIIalpha in chronic myeloid leukemia: consequences for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Annahita Sallmyr; Alan E Tomkinson; Feyruz V Rassool
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Sister chromatid cohesion and genome stability in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  C Morrison; P Vagnarelli; E Sonoda; S Takeda; W C Earnshaw
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.407

8.  DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice is directed by distinct MRE11 nuclease activities.

Authors:  Atsushi Shibata; Davide Moiani; Andrew S Arvai; Jefferson Perry; Shane M Harding; Marie-Michelle Genois; Ranjan Maity; Sari van Rossum-Fikkert; Aryandi Kertokalio; Filippo Romoli; Amani Ismail; Ermal Ismalaj; Elena Petricci; Matthew J Neale; Robert G Bristow; Jean-Yves Masson; Claire Wyman; Penny A Jeggo; John A Tainer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Mechanism of generation of therapy related leukemia in response to anti-topoisomerase II agents.

Authors:  Ian G Cowell; Caroline A Austin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Requirement for Parp-1 and DNA ligases 1 or 3 but not of Xrcc1 in chromosomal translocation formation by backup end joining.

Authors:  Aashish Soni; Maria Siemann; Martha Grabos; Tamara Murmann; Gabriel E Pantelias; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cancer cells that survive checkpoint adaptation contain micronuclei that harbor damaged DNA.

Authors:  Cody W Lewis; Roy M Golsteyn
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Alternative end-joining originates stable chromosome aberrations induced by etoposide during targeted inhibition of DNA-PKcs in ATM-deficient tumor cells.

Authors:  Marcelo de Campos Nebel; Micaela Palmitelli; Josefina Pérez Maturo; Marcela González-Cid
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Inhibition of DNA-PK potentiates the synergistic effect of NK314 and etoposide combination on human glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Paulina Kopa; Anna Macieja; Izabela Gulbas; Elzbieta Pastwa; Tomasz Poplawski
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Overexpression of the base excision repair NTHL1 glycosylase causes genomic instability and early cellular hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  Kristin L Limpose; Kelly S Trego; Zhentian Li; Sara W Leung; Altaf H Sarker; Jason A Shah; Suresh S Ramalingam; Erica M Werner; William S Dynan; Priscilla K Cooper; Anita H Corbett; Paul W Doetsch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Through the Looking Glass: Time-lapse Microscopy and Longitudinal Tracking of Single Cells to Study Anti-cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Russell T Burke; James D Orth
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 1.355

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.