Literature DB >> 16822529

Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a "cytome" assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death.

Michael Fenech1.   

Abstract

The cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay was originally developed as an ideal system for measuring micronuclei (MNi) however it can also be used to measure nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs), nuclear buds (NBUDs), cell death (necrosis or apoptosis) and nuclear division rate. Current evidence suggests that (a) NPBs originate from dicentric chromosomes in which the centromeres have been pulled to the opposite poles of the cell at anaphase and are therefore indicative of DNA mis-repair, chromosome rearrangement or telomere end-fusions, (b) NPBs may break to form MNi, (c) the nuclear budding process is the mechanism by which cells remove amplified and/or excess DNA and is therefore a marker of gene amplification and/or altered gene dosage, (d) cell cycle checkpoint defects result in micronucleus formation and (e) hypomethylation of DNA, induced nutritionally or by inhibition of DNA methyl transferase can lead to micronucleus formation either via chromosome loss or chromosome breakage. The strong correlation between micronucleus formation, nuclear budding and NPBs (r=0.75-0.77, P<0.001) induced by either folic acid deficiency or exposure to ionising radiation is supportive of the hypothesis that folic acid deficiency and/or ionising radiation cause genomic instability and gene amplification by the initiation of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. In its comprehensive mode, the CBMN assay measures all cells including necrotic and apoptotic cells as well as number of nuclei per cell to provide a measure of cytotoxicity and mitotic activity. The CBMN assay has in fact evolved into a "cytome" method for measuring comprehensively chromosomal instability phenotype and altered cellular viability caused by genetic defects and/or nutrional deficiencies and/or exogenous genotoxins thus opening up an exciting future for the use of this methodology in the emerging fields of nutrigenomics and toxicogenomics and their combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16822529     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  76 in total

1.  Mammalian Fbh1 is important to restore normal mitotic progression following decatenation stress.

Authors:  Corentin Laulier; Anita Cheng; Nick Huang; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-04-24

2.  Zinc deficiency or excess within the physiological range increases genome instability and cytotoxicity, respectively, in human oral keratinocyte cells.

Authors:  Razinah Sharif; Philip Thomas; Peter Zalewski; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.523

Review 3.  Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Marcela Maria Pereira de Lemos Pinto; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Santos; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Laser scanning cytometry for automation of the micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Piotr Smolewski; Elena Holden; Ed Luther; Mel Henriksen; Maxime François; Wayne Leifert; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 5.  Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Perumal; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Venkateswarlu Raavi; Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen; Karthik Kanagaraj; Amith Roy Chowdhury; Solomon Fd Paul
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-28

6.  Mechanisms leading to the formation of micronuclei containing sex chromosomes differ with age.

Authors:  Kimberly H Jones; Timothy P York; Colleen Jackson-Cook
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Investigation of genome instability in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Hatice Karaman; Ahmet Karaman; Hamiyet Donmez-Altuntas; Nazmiye Bitgen; Zuhal Hamurcu; Arzu Oguz; Cigdem Karakukcu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Progression of chromosomal damage induced by etoposide in G2 phase in a DNA-PKcs-deficient context.

Authors:  Micaela Palmitelli; Marcelo de Campos-Nebel; Marcela González-Cid
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  Toxicity and oxidative stress induced by chromium in workers exposed from different occupational settings around the globe: A review.

Authors:  Muhammad Junaid; Muhammad Zaffar Hashmi; Riffat Naseem Malik; De-Sheng Pei
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with OSAHS.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Jianzhong Jiang; Keyun Shi; Tingting Zhang; Taofeng Zhu; Hong Chen; Ruhua Chen; Liming Qi; Weiliang Ding; Qiyi Yi; Tieliang Ma
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.816

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.