| Literature DB >> 26152193 |
Nayyereh Olanj1,2, Teresa Garnatje3, Ali Sonboli4, Joan Vallès5, Sònia Garcia6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although karyologically well studied, the genus Tanacetum (Asteraceae) is poorly known from the perspective of molecular cytogenetics. The prevalence of polyploidy, including odd ploidy warranted an extensive cytogenetic study. We studied several species native to Iran, one of the most important centres of diversity of the genus. We aimed to characterise Tanacetum genomes through fluorochrome banding, fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) of rRNA genes and the assessment of genome size by flow cytometry. We appraise the effect of polyploidy and evaluate the existence of intraspecific variation based on the number and distribution of GC-rich bands and rDNA loci. Finally, we infer ancestral genome size and other cytogenetic traits considering phylogenetic relationships within the genus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26152193 PMCID: PMC4494159 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-015-0564-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Provenance and voucher number from the Medicinal Plants and Drug Research Institute Herbarium (MPH), Shahid Beheshti University (Tehran) of the populations of Tanacetum studied, together with genome size, number of CMA+ bands and number of rDNA sites
| Species | Population | PL1 | 2n2 | 2C3 | 2C4 | SD5 | 1Cx6 | HPCV7 | CMA8 | rDNA9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mazandaran: Pole Zangoleh road (1790) | 2 | 18 | 8.77 | 8577 | 0.04 | 4.39 | 1.77 | 56itc (50, 54, 66) | 4 |
|
| Mazandaran: Pole Zangooleh road (1788) | 2 | 18 | 10.38 | 10152 | 0.09 | 5.19 | 1.13 | 40tc (24, 30, 34, 36, 40, 42, 44) | 4 |
|
| Khorasan: Bujnourd (1477) | 2 | 18 | 10.13 | 9907 | 0.19 | 5.07 | 1.77 | 4t | 4 |
|
| Zanjan: Soltanieh (1912) | 2 | 18 | 9.3 | 9095 | 0.13 | 4.65 | 1.68 | 4, 6 and 8tc | 6 (8) |
|
| Urmia: Meyab (1848) | 4 | 36 | 17.08* | 16704 | 1.38 | 4.27 | 2.62 | 28tc (26, 32, 34) | 10 (8) |
|
| Urmia: Suluk Waterfall (1861) | 4 | 36 | 15.47* | 15130 | 0.36 | 3.87 | 2.79 | 6 and 10t (3, 4, 5) | 10 |
|
| Urmia: Sero road, Golsheykhan (1227) | 2 | 18 | 8.25 | 8069 | 0.06 | 4.13 | 2.09 | 4t (2, 3, 5, 6) | 4 and 6 |
|
| Urmia: Chaldoran (1914) | 2 | 18 | 7.67 | 7501 | 0.05 | 3.84 | 2.53 | 6t (4) | 6 |
|
| Urmia: Naghadeh (1868) | 4 | 36 | 17.57* | 17183 | 0.62 | 4.39 | 2.2 | 22t(10, 12, 14, 20, 24) | 12 (8, 10) |
|
| Urmia: Mamakan (1911) | 4 | 36 | 14.87* | 14543 | 0.28 | 3.72 | 3.02 | 10t (8, 9) | 10 |
|
| Kerman Mehr mountain, north and east slopes (1916) | 5 | 44A | 17.11* | 16734 | 0.27 | 3.42 | 2.69 | 30 tc (8, 14, 22, 24, 28) | 10 (5, 7, 6, 12, 15) |
|
| Mazandaran: Pole Zangoleh road (1791) | 2 | 18 | 8.45 | 8264 | 0.2 | 4.23 | 1.61 | 14 and 16t (18, 20, 22) | 6 |
|
| Khorasan, Chenaran, (1620) | 3 | 27 | 11.31* | 11061 | 0.11 | 3.77 | 0.92 | 24itc (32 and 36) | 6 (5, 8) |
|
| Urmia, Anhar road, Suluk (1129) | 3 | 27 | 10.04* | 9819 | 0.07 | 3.35 | 1.63 | 24tc (20, 28, 32, 34) | 6 |
|
| Tabriz: Mishodagh (1339) | 3 | 27 | 10.72* | 10484 | 0.12 | 3.57 | 1.83 | 44tc (28, 32, 42, 44, 48) | 6 |
|
| Zanjan: Ghidar (1419) | 3 | 27 | 8.58* | 8391 | 0.09 | 2.86 | 1.89 | 18tc (20, 22, 26) | 4 |
|
| Urmia: Suluk Waterfall (1127) | 2 | 18 | 4.68 | 4577 | 0.09 | 2.34 | 3.07 | 4t | 4 |
|
| Tehran: Tochal (1483) | 2 | 18 | 3.84 | 3756 | 0.04 | 1.92 | 2.46 | 2t (3, 4) | 2 (3, 4) |
|
| Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, agricultural field of research. Cultivated (1633) | 2 | 18 | 4.51 | 4411 | 0.04 | 2.26 | 3.06 | 14tc (8, 10) | 6 |
|
| Hamadan: Dare Morad Beig (1903) | 2 | 18 | 4 | 3912 | 0.04 | 2.00 | 3.02 | 3t (2,4) | 2(3, 4) |
|
| Chahar Mahal & Bakhtiari: Sabz Kuh (1502) | 2 | 18 | 4.4 | 4303 | 0.69 | 2.20 | 2.49 | 4t | 4 |
|
| Hamadan: Asad Abad (1895) | 2 | 18B | 13.19 | 12900 | 0.06 | 6.60 | 2.09 | 4t | 4 |
|
| Hamadan: Malayer (1896) | 2 | 18 | 13.18* | 12890 | 0.08 | 6.59 | 2.75 | 4t (6) | 4 |
|
| Hamadan: Razan (1894) | 4 | 36 | 24.87* | 24323 | 0.58 | 4.15 | 1.45 | 6t (3, 4, 5) | 4 and 6 (8) |
|
| Urmia: Meshkin Shahr (1884) | 2 | 18 | 9.26 | 9056 | 0.14 | 4.63 | 1.3 | 6t (5, 7, 8, 10) | 6 (7, 8) |
|
| Urmia: Ghasemloo Valley (1866) | 4 | 36 | 17.88* | 17487 | 0.84 | 4.47 | 2.84 | 8 and 10t (5, 6, 13) | 12 (14) |
| Species | Population | PL1 | 2n2 | 2C3 | 2C4 | SD5 | 1Cx6 | HPCV7 | CMA8 | rDNA9 |
|
| Urmia: Oshnaviyeh (1867) | 4 | 35 | 16.82* | 16450 | 0.4 | 4.21 | 2.94 | 6, 10, 20 and 24t | 14 (10, 11, 12, 13, 15) |
|
| Urmia: Marand (1856) | 4 | 36 | 17.89* | 17496 | 0.16 | 4.47 | 2.4 | 32 and 36t (8, 20) | 12 (14) |
|
| Urmia: Ghishchi (1212) | 4 | 36 | 18.24* | 17839 | 0.31 | 4.56 | 2.4 | 16t (8, 14) | 12 |
|
| Mazandaran: Pole Zangoleh road (1795) | 4 | 36 | 17.63* | 17242 | 0.53 | 4.41 | 3.22 | 14tc (18, 20, 22, 24) | 12 (11) |
|
| Hamadan: Kabudar Ahang (1901) | 6 | 54 | 24.12** | 23589 | 0.39 | 4.02 | 3.46 | 22 and 24t (18, 20, 26) | 13 (14, 17) |
|
| Mazandaran: Pole Zangoleh road (1797) | 4 | 36 | 18.10* | 17702 | 0.29 | 4.53 | 2.48 | 18 and 22t (16, 18, 20, 30, 32) | 12 (9, 10, 11) |
|
| Hamadan: Asad Abad (1899) | 6 | 54 | 22.99** | 22484 | 0.56 | 3.83 | 2.88 | 8t (10, 12, 14, 16) | 18 (15, 16, 17) |
|
| (305) Urmia: Takab | 2 | 18 | 9.17 | 8968 | 0.19 | 4.59 | 2.12 | 5t (4, 6, 8) | 8 |
|
| Urmia: Ahar (1905) | 6 | 54 | 23.56** | 23042 | 1.12 | 3.93 | 2.59 | 20 and 26t (14, 16, 27) | 14 and 16 (10, 12) |
|
| Urmia: Ahar (1906) | 6 | 54 | 24.01** | 23482 | 0.16 | 4.00 | 1.96 | 50t (28, 40) | 16 (14, 15, 26) |
|
| Tehran: Damavand (863) | 2 | 18 | 7.68 | 7511 | 0.13 | 3.84 | 1.11 | 32, 34 and 46tc | 6 (8, 10) |
|
| Urmia: Jolfa (1855) | 4 | 36 | 16.26* | 15902 | 1.33 | 4.07 | 2.74 | 16 and 22 tc | 9 |
All populations are native to Iran. (1) ploidy; (2) chromosome number; (3) genome size in pg; Petunia hybrida ‘PxPC6’ (2C = 2.85 pg), (*) Pisum sativum ‘Express Long’ (2C = 8.37 pg), and (**) Triticum aestivum ‘Chinese Spring’ (2C = 30.9 pg) were used as internal standards; (4) genome size in Mbp (1 pg = 978 Mbp); (5) standard deviation; (6) monoploid genome size; (7) half peak coefficient of variation for each population; (8) most commonly found number of CMA+ bands, together with the most usual position found for them (I = interstitial, t = terminal or subterminal, c = centromeric or pericentromeric); in brackets, other numbers of CMA+ bands found; (9) most commonly found number of rDNA sites; in brackets other numbers of rDNA sites found (position of rDNA sites is always terminal or subterminal). AThe expected number for a pentaploid would be 2n = 45 but there is an already described hypoaneuploidy for this taxon, sometimes presenting a B chromosome (2n = 44 + 1B, [105]); Btwo to three B-chromosomes occasionally found
Fig. 1Fluorescence histograms of the genome size assessments of (a) T. heimerlii 2x population (2) with Petunia hybrida (1) as internal standard, (b) T. pinnatum 4x population (4) with Pisum sativum (3) as internal standard and (c) T. polycephalum ssp. heterophyllum 6x population (5) with Triticum aestivum (6) as internal standard
Fig. 2Chromomycin A3-positive (CMA+) and FISH images of the most commonly found metaphases of representative species of each ploidy level in Tanacetum. CMA+ bands are marked yellow, 26S-5S rDNA signals, marked orange in images. CMA+ positive bands are marked yellow, 26S-5S rDNA signals, are marked red-green in the schematic representation of chromosomes. (a, b, c) Tanacetum pinnatum, 2x population (Asad Abad, 1895) showing four CMA+ and four rDNA signals; (d, e, f) T. kotschyii, 3x population (Urmia, 1129) showing up to 24 CMA and six rDNA signals; large CMA+ bands indicated with asterisks; (g, h, i) T. oligocephalum, 4x population (Mamakan, 1911), showing 10 CMA+ and 10 rDNA signals; large CMA+ bands indicated with asterisks and faint bands indicated with arrows; (j, k, l) T. fisherae, 5x population, showing up to 30 CMA+ and 10 rDNA signals; large rDNA signals indicated with asterisks; (m, n, o) T. tabrisianum 6x population (Ahar, 1906), showing up to 50 CMA+ and 16 rDNA signals; large rDNA signals indicated with asterisks. Scale bars = 10 μm
Fig. 3Chromomycin A3-positive (CMA+) FISH images of cytogenetically variable Tanacetum species, in which CMA+ bands are marked yellow, 26S-5S rDNA signals and marked orange. (a, b) T. archibaldii (2x) with 56 CMA signals (asterisks indicate interacalary CMA+ bands) and with 4 rDNA signals; (c, d) T. balsamita, 2x, with 40 CMA+ signals (many of them pericentromeric, indicated with asterisks) and with four rDNA signals – a slightly decondensed rDNA is indicated with an arrow; cultivated (e, f) and wild (g,h) T. parthenium (from Shahid Beheshti University, 1633 and Tochal, 1483, respectively), both 2x with 14 and six CMA+ and six and two rDNA signals observed, respectively; (i, j) T. kotschyi (Tabriz, Mishodagh, 1339), 3x, with 44 CMA+ signals and six rDNA signals and (k, l) T. joharchii, 3x, with 24 CMA and six rDNA signals; note faint or interstitial CMA+ bands indicated with asterisks and decondensed rDNAs indicated with arrows in both pictures. Scale bars = 10 μm
Fig. 4Ancestral state reconstruction of number of rDNA signals (left) and genome size (right) for diploid Tanacetum taxa. The model of reconstruction was Parsimony as implemented in Mesquite (v.3.02), and ancestral state reconstruction was estimated using the 50 % majority-rule consensus topology obtained by Bayesian inference phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), ITS2 and trnH-psbA data sequence. The Bayesian clade-credibility values (posterior probability > 0.5) are given above branches. Schematic representation of chromosomes with the most commonly found numbers of rDNA signals and bars that depict genome sizes (2C values) with a red line indicating the mean 2C value at the diploid level. (*) Tanacetum polycephalum ssp. argyrophyllum