| Literature DB >> 26147378 |
Masayuki Ozawa1, Takehiro Himaki2, Shoji Ookutsu2, Yamato Mizobe2, Junki Ogawa2, Kazuchika Miyoshi2, Akira Yabuki3, Jianglin Fan4, Mitsutoshi Yoshida2.
Abstract
High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are a major risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. However, because apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], the unique component of Lp(a), is found only in primates and humans, the study of human Lp(a) has been hampered due to the lack of appropriate animal models. Using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) techniques, we produced transgenic miniature pigs expressing human apo(a) in the plasma. First, we placed the hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged cDNA of human apo(a) under the control of the β-actin promoter and cytomegalovirus enhancer, and then introduced this construct into kidney epithelial cells. Immunostaining of cells with anti-HA antibody allowed identification of cells stably expressing apo(a); one of the positive clones was used to provide donor cells for SCNT, yielding blastocysts that expressed apo(a). Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue sections and RT-PCR analysis of total RNA from organs of cloned piglet revealed that apo(a) is expressed in various tissues/organs including heart, liver, kidney, and intestine. More importantly, a transgenic line exhibited a high level (>400 mg/dL) of Lp(a) in plasma, and the transgenic apo(a) gene was transmitted to the offspring. Thus, we generated a human apo(a)-transgenic miniature pig that can be used as a model system to study advanced atherosclerosis related to human disease. The anatomical and physiological similarities between the swine and human cardiovascular systems will make this pig model a valuable source of information on the role of apo(a) in the formation of atherosclerosis, as well as the mechanisms underlying vascular health and disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26147378 PMCID: PMC4492603 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Isolation of pig kidney epithelial cells stably expressing human apo(a).
A, schematic representation of the pC-apo(a)HA construct. The vector contains the CAG promoter, HA-tagged apo(a) gene, β-globin polyadenylation signal (polyA), and neo gene under the control of herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (tk) promoter. B, stable transfectants of MDCK cells expressing HA-tagged human apo(a) or HA-tagged E-cadherin (Ecad) were immunostained with anti-HA monoclonal antibody, followed by rhodamine-conjugated anti-rat IgG. Note the punctate staining of HA fluorescent signals that correspond to ER in apo(a)-expressing cells and the membrane staining of the cell–cell contact sites in E-cadherin (a cell–cell adhesion molecule)-expressing cells. Bar, 25 μm. C, Stably transfected pig kidney epithelial cells expressing human apo(a) were immunostained with anti-HA monoclonal antibody. Note the ER staining. Bar, 25 μm. D, Total cell lysates of parental pig kidney epithelial (PKE) cells or stable transfectants [apo(a)+] were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-HA antibody. E, Conditioned medium of PKE or apo(a)+ cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibody. Collected materials were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-apo(a) antibody.
Fig 2Expression of human apo(a) in SCNT embryos and tissues of transgenic piglets.
A, SCNT embryos after 7 d culture were stained with anti-HA antibody (left) or Hoechst 33342 (right). Bars, 50 μm. B, Paraffin sections were stained with anti-HA antibody, followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and DAB substrate. Finally, the sections were stained with hematoxylin and mounted. The left and right panels show tissue from transgenic and non-transgenic piglets, respectively. a) brain, b) lung, c) heart, d) liver, e) kidney, f) stomach, g) small intestine, h) large intestine, i) testis. Bars, 100 μm. C, RT-PCR analysis showing expression of human apo(a) mRNA in the kidney of three transgenic piglets. Lanes: M, 100 bp DNA ladder markers; 1, kidney of transgenic piglet #1; 2, kidney of transgenic piglet #2; 3, kidney of transgenic piglet #3; 4, pig kidney epithelial cells stably expressing human apo(a) used as donor of SCNT; 5, kidney of non-transgenic pig; 6, liver of non-transgenic piglet. A band of 233 bp, corresponding to the β-actin (arrowhead) was detected in all samples, whereas a band of 158 bp, corresponding to the human apo(a) transcripts (arrow), is found in transgenic samples but not in non-transgenic samples. D, RT-PCR analysis showing expression of human apo(a) mRNA in the organs of a transgenic piglet. Bands of 233 bp (β-actin, arrowhead) and 158 bp (human apo(a), arrow) are visible. Lanes: M, 100 bp DNA ladder markers; 1, brain; 2, lung; 3, heart; 4, aorta; 5, muscle; 6, liver; 7, kidney; 8, pancreas; 9, spleen; 10, stomach; 11, small intestine; 12, large intestine; 13, skin.
In vivo development ability of SCNT embryos derived from transgenic kidney epithelial cells.
| Recipient | Number of embryos transferred | Pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography | Number of piglets born | Birth weight of piglet (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 106 (108) | Yes | 0 | - |
| B | 60 (146) | No | - | - |
| C | 210 (0) | Yes | 3 | 220, 220, 200 |
| D | 125 (124) | No | - | - |
| E | 105 (102) | No | - | - |
a: Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of non-transgenic SCNT embryos transferred to support the pregnancy.
b: Detection of fetal sac and/or fetus.
c: The birth weight of the three piglets was considerably less than the average birth weight (500 g) of the Clawn miniature pig. Therefore, they might be premature and we could not save their life.
d: We do not know the reason why four co-transfers of transgenic SCNT embryos and non-transgenic ones produced no viable transgenic piglets whereas the one transfer of transgenic embryos by themselves produced viable piglets. One possible explanation may be as follows. We use around 200 embryos for one transfer, and when the number of transgenic embryos prepared during a certain period of time does not reach 200, we includeed non-transgenic ones. In the case when we could prepare more than 200 transgenic embryos, we did not include non-transgenic ones. In the latter case, their quality was good enough for pregnancy.
Plasma lipid and human apo(a) levels in transgenic miniature pigs on chow diet.
| Miniature pig | 158-bp apo(a) PCR band | Lp(a) mg/dL | Total Cholesterol mg/dL | TG mg/dL | LDL-C mg/dL | HDL-C mg/dL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minidora (♂) | + | 682 | 77 | 16 | 37 | 38 |
| Natts (♀) | nd | 2 | 64 | 17 | 33 | 30 |
| CH53 (♀) | nd | 2 | 91 | 33 | 45 | 40 |
| Kinoko (♀) | nd | <1 | 60 | 33 | 27 | 32 |
| No. 2 (♂) | + | 427 | 57 | 16 | 33 | 22 |
| No. 3 (♂) | - | <1 | 67 | 7 | 31 | 34 |
| No. 4 (♂) | - | <1 | 51 | 49 | 22 | 28 |
| No. 5 (♂) | + | 514 | 78 | 15 | 38 | 39 |
Note: Minidora is the founder of the human apo(a)-transgenic miniature pig line. Three non-transgenic females (Natts, CH53, and Kinoko) were used as negative controls. Four piglets (No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, and No. 5) were produced from a sow after artificial insemination using semen from the PCR-positive boar (Minidora), of which two were positive in the PCR analysis (No. 2 and No. 5). Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); LDL-C, LDL cholesterol, HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; TG, triglycerides. nd, not determined.
Fig 3The transgenic miniature pig and his offspring.
A, pedigree of the transgenic miniature pig clone expressing human apo(a). Two offspring (No. 1 and 6) were dead when they were found, and could not be analyzed. B, Identification of the transgene, apo(a), in genomic DNA of offspring by PCR. The arrow indicates the position of the PCR product. C, Photograph of apo(a)-positive offspring (No. 2 and 5).
Fig 4Immunoblot analysis of transgenic pig plasma apo(a).
Aliquots of plasma were separated by either 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) or 4% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing (left) or reducing (right) conditions. The SDS-PAGE samples of nonreducing and reducing conditions were electrophoresed on the same gels. After electrophoretic transfer, the proteins were immunoblotted using an anti-human apo(a) mAb or an anti-apoB mAb as described in Materials and Methods. Since the reactivity of materials separated under reducings to anti-apo(a) mAb become weak, they were blotted with anti-HA mAb.