Literature DB >> 26146423

LEARNING NONADJACENT DEPENDENCIES IN PHONOLOGY: TRANSPARENT VOWELS IN VOWEL HARMONY.

Sara Finley1.   

Abstract

Nonadjacent dependencies are an important part of the structure of language. While the majority of syntactic and phonological processes occur at a local domain, there are several processes that appear to apply at a distance, posing a challenge for theories of linguistic structure. This article addresses one of the most common nonadjacent phenomena in phonology: transparent vowels in vowel harmony. Vowel harmony occurs when adjacent vowels are required to share the same phonological feature value (e.g. V+F C V+F). However, transparent vowels create a second-order nonadjacent pattern because agreement between two vowels can 'skip' the transparent neutral vowel in addition to consonants (e.g. V+F C VT-F C V+F). Adults are shown to display initial learning biases against second-order nonadjacency in experiments that use an artificial grammar learning paradigm. Experiments 1-3 show that adult learners fail to learn the second-order long-distance dependency created by the transparent vowel (as compared to a control condition). In experiments 4-5, training in terms of overall exposure as well as the frequency of relevant transparent items was increased. With adequate exposure, learners reliably generalize to novel words containing transparent vowels. The experiments suggest that learners are sensitive to the structure of phonological representations, even when learning occurs at a relatively rapid pace.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial grammar learning; nonadjacent dependencies; phonology; transparent vowels; vowel harmony

Year:  2015        PMID: 26146423      PMCID: PMC4486290          DOI: 10.1353/lan.2015.0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Language (Baltim)        ISSN: 0097-8507


  7 in total

1.  Variability and detection of invariant structure.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

2.  Articulatory characteristics of Hungarian 'transparent' vowels.

Authors:  Stefan Benus; Adamantios I Gafos
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2007

3.  The effect of sonority on word segmentation: evidence for the use of a phonological universal.

Authors:  Marc Ettlinger; Amy S Finn; Carla L Hudson Kam
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-11-03

4.  Contributions of phonetic token variability and word-type frequency to phonological representations.

Authors:  Peter Richtsmeier; Louann Gerken; Diane Ohala
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2010-12-03

5.  Greater learnability is not sufficient to produce cultural universals.

Authors:  Anna N Rafferty; Thomas L Griffiths; Marc Ettlinger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-07-04

6.  The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies.

Authors:  Elissa L Newport; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.468

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Testing the limits of long-distance learning: learning beyond a three-segment window.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-02-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.