Literature DB >> 22303815

Testing the limits of long-distance learning: learning beyond a three-segment window.

Sara Finley1.   

Abstract

Traditional flat-structured bigram and trigram models of phonotactics are useful because they capture a large number of facts about phonological processes. Additionally, these models predict that local interactions should be easier to learn than long-distance ones because long-distance dependencies are difficult to capture with these models. Long-distance phonotactic patterns have been observed by linguists in many languages, who have proposed different kinds of models, including feature-based bigram and trigram models, as well as precedence models. Contrary to flat-structured bigram and trigram models, these alternatives capture unbounded dependencies because at an abstract level of representation, the relevant elements are locally dependent, even if they are not adjacent at the observable level. Using an artificial grammar learning paradigm, we provide additional support for these alternative models of phonotactics. Participants in two experiments were exposed to a long-distance consonant-harmony pattern in which the first consonant of a five-syllable word was [s] or [∫] ("sh") and triggered a suffix that was either [-su] or [-∫u] depending on the sibilant quality of this first consonant. Participants learned this pattern, despite the large distance between the trigger and the target, suggesting that when participants learn long-distance phonological patterns, that pattern is learned without specific reference to distance.
Copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22303815      PMCID: PMC3348425          DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01227.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  7 in total

1.  Variability and detection of invariant structure.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

2.  Relationships between language structure and language learning: the suffixing preference and grammatical categorization.

Authors:  Michelle C St Clair; Padraic Monaghan; Michael Ramscar
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-09

3.  Bootstrapping Word Boundaries: A Bottom-up Corpus-Based Approach to Speech Segmentation

Authors: 
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.

Authors:  Colin Wilson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-09-10

5.  LEARNING NONADJACENT DEPENDENCIES IN PHONOLOGY: TRANSPARENT VOWELS IN VOWEL HARMONY.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  Language (Baltim)       Date:  2015-03

6.  The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies.

Authors:  Elissa L Newport; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.468

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  An onset is an onset: Evidence from abstraction of newly-learned phonotactic constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.