Literature DB >> 23831566

Greater learnability is not sufficient to produce cultural universals.

Anna N Rafferty1, Thomas L Griffiths, Marc Ettlinger.   

Abstract

Looking across human societies reveals regularities in the languages that people speak and the concepts that they use. One explanation that has been proposed for these "cultural universals" is differences in the ease with which people learn particular languages and concepts. A difference in learnability means that languages and concepts possessing a particular property are more likely to be accurately transmitted from one generation of learners to the next. Intuitively, this difference could allow languages and concepts that are more learnable to become more prevalent after multiple generations of cultural transmission. If this is the case, the prevalence of languages and concepts with particular properties can be explained simply by demonstrating empirically that they are more learnable. We evaluate this argument using mathematical analysis and behavioral experiments. Specifically, we provide two counter-examples that show how greater learnability need not result in a property becoming prevalent. First, more learnable languages and concepts can nonetheless be less likely to be produced spontaneously as a result of transmission failures. We simulated cultural transmission in the laboratory to show that this can occur for memory of distinctive items: these items are more likely to be remembered, but not generated spontaneously once they have been forgotten. Second, when there are many languages or concepts that lack the more learnable property, sheer numbers can swamp the benefit produced by greater learnability. We demonstrate this using a second series of experiments involving artificial language learning. Both of these counter-examples show that simply finding a learnability bias experimentally is not sufficient to explain why a particular property is prevalent in the languages or concepts used in human societies: explanations for cultural universals based on cultural transmission need to consider the full set of hypotheses a learner could entertain and all of the kinds of errors that can occur in transmission.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cultural evolution; Cultural universals; Iterated learning; Learnability bias; Vowel harmony

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23831566      PMCID: PMC3752284          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  22 in total

1.  Language evolution by iterated learning with bayesian agents.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Michael L Kalish
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-06

2.  Language dynamics in finite populations.

Authors:  Natalia L Komarova; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Variability and detection of invariant structure.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

4.  Learning biases predict a word order universal.

Authors:  Jennifer Culbertson; Paul Smolensky; Géraldine Legendre
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-12-28

5.  Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.

Authors:  Colin Wilson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-09-10

6.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A rational analysis of the effects of memory biases on serial reproduction.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The evolution of frequency distributions: relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning.

Authors:  Florencia Reali; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-26

9.  Innateness and culture in the evolution of language.

Authors:  Simon Kirby; Mike Dowman; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Iterated learning: intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases.

Authors:  Michael L Kaush; Thomas L Griffiths; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  LEARNING NONADJACENT DEPENDENCIES IN PHONOLOGY: TRANSPARENT VOWELS IN VOWEL HARMONY.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  Language (Baltim)       Date:  2015-03

2.  The Relationship Between Artificial and Second Language Learning.

Authors:  Marc Ettlinger; Kara Morgan-Short; Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-07-22

3.  The cultural evolution of human communication systems in different sized populations: usability trumps learnability.

Authors:  Nicolas Fay; T Mark Ellison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.