Alex S Willoughby1, Gui-Shuang Ying2, Cynthia A Toth1, Maureen G Maguire2, Russell E Burns3, Juan E Grunwald2, Ebenezer Daniel2, Glenn J Jaffe4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Duke Reading Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: glenn.jaffe@dm.duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) with visual acuity (VA), geographic atrophy (GA), and scar in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study within a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: The 1185 CATT participants. METHODS: Masked readers graded scar and GA on fundus photography and fluorescein angiography and graded SHRM on time-domain and spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) throughout 104 weeks. Measurements of SHRM height and width in the fovea, within the center 1 mm(2), or outside the center 1mm(2) were obtained on SD OCT images at 56 (n = 76) and 104 (n = 66) weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of SHRM, as well as location and size, and associations with VA, scar, and GA. RESULTS: Among CATT participants, the percentage with SHRM at enrollment was 77%, decreasing to 68% at 4 weeks after treatment and to 54% at 104 weeks. At 104 weeks, scar was present more often in eyes with persistent SHRM than in eyes with SHRM that resolved (64% vs. 31%; P < 0.0001). Among eyes with detailed evaluation of SHRM at weeks 56 (n = 76) and 104 (n = 66), mean VA letter score was 73.5 (standard error [SE], 2.8), 73.1 (SE, 3.4), 65.3 (SE, 3.5), and 63.9 (SE, 3.7) when SHRM was absent, present outside the central 1 mm(2), present within the central 1 mm(2) but not the foveal center, or present at the foveal center (P = 0.02), respectively. When SHRM was present, the median maximum height under the fovea, within the central 1 mm(2) including the fovea and anywhere within the scan, was 86 μm, 120 μm, and 122 μm, respectively. Visual acuity was decreased with greater SHRM height and width (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), SHRM is common and often persists after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. At 2 years, eyes with scar were more likely to have SHRM than other eyes. Greater SHRM dimensions were associated with worse VA. In eyes with neovascular AMD, SHRM is an important morphologic biomarker.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) with visual acuity (VA), geographic atrophy (GA), and scar in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study within a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: The 1185 CATT participants. METHODS: Masked readers graded scar and GA on fundus photography and fluorescein angiography and graded SHRM on time-domain and spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) throughout 104 weeks. Measurements of SHRM height and width in the fovea, within the center 1 mm(2), or outside the center 1mm(2) were obtained on SD OCT images at 56 (n = 76) and 104 (n = 66) weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of SHRM, as well as location and size, and associations with VA, scar, and GA. RESULTS: Among CATT participants, the percentage with SHRM at enrollment was 77%, decreasing to 68% at 4 weeks after treatment and to 54% at 104 weeks. At 104 weeks, scar was present more often in eyes with persistent SHRM than in eyes with SHRM that resolved (64% vs. 31%; P < 0.0001). Among eyes with detailed evaluation of SHRM at weeks 56 (n = 76) and 104 (n = 66), mean VA letter score was 73.5 (standard error [SE], 2.8), 73.1 (SE, 3.4), 65.3 (SE, 3.5), and 63.9 (SE, 3.7) when SHRM was absent, present outside the central 1 mm(2), present within the central 1 mm(2) but not the foveal center, or present at the foveal center (P = 0.02), respectively. When SHRM was present, the median maximum height under the fovea, within the central 1 mm(2) including the fovea and anywhere within the scan, was 86 μm, 120 μm, and 122 μm, respectively. Visual acuity was decreased with greater SHRM height and width (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), SHRM is common and often persists after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. At 2 years, eyes with scar were more likely to have SHRM than other eyes. Greater SHRM dimensions were associated with worse VA. In eyes with neovascular AMD, SHRM is an important morphologic biomarker.
Authors: Tina Ristau; Pearse A Keane; Alexander C Walsh; Alicia Engin; Nils Mokwa; Bernd Kirchhof; Srinivas R Sadda; Sandra Liakopoulos Journal: Ophthalmologica Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francis Char DeCroos; Cynthia A Toth; Sandra S Stinnett; Cynthia S Heydary; Russell Burns; Glenn J Jaffe Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ebenezer Daniel; Cynthia A Toth; Juan E Grunwald; Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Stuart L Fine; Jiayan Huang; Gui-shuang Ying; Stephanie A Hagstrom; Katrina Winter; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Sharon D Solomon; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Magdalena G Krzystolik; Barbara S Hawkins Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-08-29
Authors: Gui-shuang Ying; Benjamin J Kim; Maureen G Maguire; Jiayan Huang; Ebenezer Daniel; Glenn J Jaffe; Juan E Grunwald; Kevin J Blinder; Christina J Flaxel; Firas Rahhal; Carl Regillo; Daniel F Martin Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Juan E Grunwald; Ebenezer Daniel; Jiayan Huang; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Cynthia A Toth; Glenn J Jaffe; Stuart L Fine; Barbara Blodi; Michael L Klein; Alison A Martin; Stephanie A Hagstrom; Daniel F Martin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-09-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ebenezer Daniel; James Shaffer; Gui-shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Daniel F Martin; Glenn J Jaffe; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Cynthia A Toth; Vincent Tai; Maxwell Pistilli; Stephanie J Chiu; Katrina P Winter; Ebenezer Daniel; Juan E Grunwald; Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Gui-Shuang Ying; Sina Farsiu; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-12-03
Authors: Glenn J Jaffe; Gui-Shuang Ying; Cynthia A Toth; Ebenezer Daniel; Juan E Grunwald; Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Amir H Kashani; Chieh-Li Chen; Jin K Gahm; Fang Zheng; Grace M Richter; Philip J Rosenfeld; Yonggang Shi; Ruikang K Wang Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 21.198