Hamid Hosseini1, Gilad Rabina2,3, Moritz Pettenkofer1, Adrian Au1, Ismael Chehaibou1,4, Gad Heilweil1, Adam J Weiner1, Michael Ip5, Anat Loewenstein6, Steven D Schwartz1. 1. Retina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Retina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. giladrabina@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. giladrabina@hotmail.com. 4. Ophthalmology Department, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université de Paris, F-75010, Paris, France. 5. Doheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) patients with irregular pigment epithelium detachment (PED) and non-resolving subretinal fluid (SRF) despite continuous monthly injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). METHODS: This is a retrospective case series, including NV-AMD patients treated in a tertiary academic practice. Inclusion criteria were NV-AMD diagnosis, with irregular PED, and non-resolving SRF treated with continuous monthly anti-VEGF intravitreal injections. Data collection included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), sub-foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and type and location of PED as seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: A total of 738 patients with NV-AMD underwent anti-VEGF injections during the follow-up period and 20 eyes of 19 patients (14 females and 5 males) met the inclusion criteria. Average age was 81.7 ± 6.6 years, mean follow-up time was 32.1 ± 23.5 months, and mean number of injections was 31.3 ± 24.2. Mean VA was 0.26 ± 0.21 logMAR (Snellen 20/36) at baseline versus 0.20 ± 0.23 logMAR (Snellen 20/32) at the end of the follow-up (P = 0.28). All eyes presented with sub-foveal, type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV). Average sub-foveal choroidal thickness changed from 189.70 ± 68.46 μm at baseline to 169.00 ± 63.06 μm (P < 0.001) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients with type 1 NV-AMD, irregular PED, and non-resolving SRF and under continuous treatment of monthly anti-VEGF injections may maintain good visual acuity after long period of time.
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) patients with irregular pigment epithelium detachment (PED) and non-resolving subretinal fluid (SRF) despite continuous monthly injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). METHODS: This is a retrospective case series, including NV-AMDpatients treated in a tertiary academic practice. Inclusion criteria were NV-AMD diagnosis, with irregular PED, and non-resolving SRF treated with continuous monthly anti-VEGF intravitreal injections. Data collection included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), sub-foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and type and location of PED as seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: A total of 738 patients with NV-AMD underwent anti-VEGF injections during the follow-up period and 20 eyes of 19 patients (14 females and 5 males) met the inclusion criteria. Average age was 81.7 ± 6.6 years, mean follow-up time was 32.1 ± 23.5 months, and mean number of injections was 31.3 ± 24.2. Mean VA was 0.26 ± 0.21 logMAR (Snellen 20/36) at baseline versus 0.20 ± 0.23 logMAR (Snellen 20/32) at the end of the follow-up (P = 0.28). All eyes presented with sub-foveal, type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV). Average sub-foveal choroidal thickness changed from 189.70 ± 68.46 μm at baseline to 169.00 ± 63.06 μm (P < 0.001) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION:Patients with type 1 NV-AMD, irregular PED, and non-resolving SRF and under continuous treatment of monthly anti-VEGF injections may maintain good visual acuity after long period of time.
Authors: S Y Cohen; C Creuzot-Garcher; J Darmon; T Desmettre; J F Korobelnik; F Levrat; G Quentel; S Paliès; A Sanchez; A Solesse de Gendre; H Schluep; M Weber; C Delcourt Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-03-23 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Philip J Rosenfeld; David M Brown; Jeffrey S Heier; David S Boyer; Peter K Kaiser; Carol Y Chung; Robert Y Kim Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark C Gillies; Anna Campain; Daniel Barthelmes; Judy M Simpson; Jennifer J Arnold; Robyn H Guymer; Ian L McAllister; Rohan W Essex; Nigel Morlet; Alex P Hunyor Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Cynthia A Toth; Ebenezer Daniel; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-Shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Jiayan Huang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Richard F Spaide; Glenn J Jaffe; David Sarraf; K Bailey Freund; Srinivas R Sadda; Giovanni Staurenghi; Nadia K Waheed; Usha Chakravarthy; Philip J Rosenfeld; Frank G Holz; Eric H Souied; Salomon Y Cohen; Giuseppe Querques; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; David Boyer; Alain Gaudric; Barbara Blodi; Caroline R Baumal; Xiaoxin Li; Gabriel J Coscas; Alexander Brucker; Lawrence Singerman; Phil Luthert; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Hans E Grossniklaus; David J Wilson; Robyn Guymer; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Emily Y Chew; Karl Csaky; Jordi M Monés; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Ramin Tadayoni; James Fujimoto Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 12.079