Literature DB >> 33103218

Assessment of end-tidal carbon dioxide and vena cava collapsibility in volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients.

S Güney Pınar1, M Pekdemir1, I U Özturan2, N Ö Doğan1, E Yaka1, S Yılmaz1, A Karadaş1, D Ferek Emir1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients has been demonstrated. However, the data on spontaneously breathing patients is controversial. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of variations in the ETCO2 (∆ETCO2) and IVCCI (∆IVCCI) gradient in predicting volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with hypovolemia.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in an academic emergency department (ED). Spontaneously breathing patients who required fluid resuscitation due to hypovolemia were included in the study. Cardiac output (CO), IVCCI and ETCO2 were measured before and after the passive leg raise (PRL). A change in the CO of ≥15% after the PLR were considered volume responsive. The difference in the ∆ETCO2 and ∆IVCCI were compared between the volume responsive and nonresponsive groups.
RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included in the study, of whom 15 patients were volume responsive. The difference in the ∆ETCO2 was 4 mm Hg in the volume responsive and 2 mm Hg in the nonresponsive group (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in ∆IVCCI between the groups. A moderate correlation was detected between the difference in ∆ETCO2 and CO (0.585; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: ∆ETCO2 can be an alternative method in predicting volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with hypovolemia.
© 2020. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capnography; Cardiac output; Hypovolemia; Oxygen deficiency; Shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33103218     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-020-00749-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  22 in total

1.  Can one size fit all? The fine line between fluid overload and hypovolemia.

Authors:  Thierry Boulain; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Volume responsiveness assessed by passive leg raising and a fluid challenge: a critical review focused on mean systemic filling pressure.

Authors:  K Cooke; R Sharvill; S Sondergaard; A Aneman
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Changes in end-tidal CO2 could predict fluid responsiveness in the passive leg raising test but not in the mini-fluid challenge test: A prospective and observational study.

Authors:  Wang Xiao-ting; Zhao Hua; Liu Da-wei; Zhang Hong-min; He Huai-wu; Long Yun; Chai Wen-zhao
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Aurélien Bataille; Eric Magalhaes; Jérôme Barrois; Marine Le Corre; Clément Gosset; Laurent Guerin; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Assessment of fluid responsiveness with end-tidal carbon dioxide using a simplified passive leg raising maneuver: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Francis Toupin; Ariane Clairoux; Alain Deschamps; Jean-Sébastien Lebon; Yoan Lamarche; Jean Lambert; Annik Fortier; André Y Denault
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Distributive Shock in the Emergency Department: Sepsis, Anaphylaxis, or Capillary Leak Syndrome?

Authors:  Cansu Alyeşil; Nurettin Özgür Doğan; İbrahim Ulaş Özturan; Seda Güney
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 7.  Beyond Mean Arterial Pressure and Lactate: Perfusion End Points for Managing the Shocked Patient.

Authors:  Stephen D Hallisey; John C Greenwood
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Disparity between mainstream and sidestream end-tidal carbon dioxide values and arterial carbon dioxide levels.

Authors:  Murat Pekdemir; Orhan Cinar; Serkan Yilmaz; Elif Yaka; Melih Yuksel
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.258

9.  Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Massimo Antonelli; Richard Beale; Jan Bakker; Christoph Hofer; Roman Jaeschke; Alexandre Mebazaa; Michael R Pinsky; Jean Louis Teboul; Jean Louis Vincent; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul E Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  1 in total

1.  Value of variation of end-tidal carbon dioxide for predicting fluid responsiveness during the passive leg raising test in patients with mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haijun Huang; Chenxia Wu; Qinkang Shen; Yixin Fang; Hua Xu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 9.097

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.