Literature DB >> 26138886

Delayed in vitro development of Up states but normal network plasticity in Fragile X circuits.

Helen Motanis1, Dean Buonomano1.   

Abstract

A broad range of neurophysiological phenotypes have been reported since the generation of the first mouse model of Fragile X syndrome (FXS). However, it remains unclear which phenotypes are causally related to the cognitive deficits associated with FXS. Indeed, because many of these phenotypes are known to be modulated by experience, a confounding factor in the interpretation of many studies is whether some phenotypes are an indirect consequence of abnormal development and experience. To help diminish this confound we first conducted an in vitro developmental study of spontaneous neural dynamics in cortical organotypic cultures. A significant developmental increase in network activity and Up states was observed in both wild-type and Fmr1(-/y) circuits, along with a specific developmental delay in the emergence of Up states in knockout circuits. To determine whether Up state regulation is generally impaired in FXS circuits, we examined Up state plasticity using chronic optogenetic stimulation. Wild-type and Fmr1(-/y) stimulated circuits exhibited a significant decrease in overall spontaneous activity including Up state frequency; however, no significant effect of genotype was observed. These results demonstrate that developmental delays characteristic of FXS are recapitulated during in vitro development, and that Up state abnormalities are probably a direct consequence of the disease, and not an indirect consequence of abnormal experience. However, the fact that Fmr1(-/y) circuits exhibited normal homeostatic modulation of Up states suggests that these plasticity mechanisms are largely intact, and that some of the previously reported plasticity deficits could reflect abnormal experience or the engagement of compensatory mechanisms.
© 2015 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  homeostatic plasticity; mouse; optogenetic stimulation; organotypic slices; spontaneous activity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26138886      PMCID: PMC5873292          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  72 in total

1.  Impaired dendritic expression and plasticity of h-channels in the fmr1(-/y) mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Darrin H Brager; Arvin R Akhavan; Daniel Johnston
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Auditory and visual cortical activity during selective attention in fragile X syndrome: a cascade of processing deficiencies.

Authors:  M J W Van der Molen; M W Van der Molen; K R Ridderinkhof; B C J Hamel; L M G Curfs; G J A Ramakers
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of fragile X syndrome: a twenty-year perspective.

Authors:  Michael R Santoro; Steven M Bray; Stephen T Warren
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 23.472

4.  Chronic electrical stimulation homeostatically decreases spontaneous activity, but paradoxically increases evoked network activity.

Authors:  Anubhuti Goel; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Epilepsy and EEG findings in males with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  S A Musumeci; R J Hagerman; R Ferri; P Bosco; B Dalla Bernardina; C A Tassinari; G B De Sarro; M Elia
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 6.  Which comes first in fragile X syndrome, dendritic spine dysgenesis or defects in circuit plasticity?

Authors:  Carlos Portera-Cailliau
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  Impaired inhibitory control of cortical synchronization in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Scott M Paluszkiewicz; Jose Luis Olmos-Serrano; Joshua G Corbin; Molly M Huntsman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Homeostatic responses fail to correct defective amygdala inhibitory circuit maturation in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Rebecca L Vislay; Brandon S Martin; Jose Luis Olmos-Serrano; Sebila Kratovac; David L Nelson; Joshua G Corbin; Molly M Huntsman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Imbalance of neocortical excitation and inhibition and altered UP states reflect network hyperexcitability in the mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Jay R Gibson; Aundrea F Bartley; Seth A Hays; Kimberly M Huber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Critical period plasticity is disrupted in the barrel cortex of FMR1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Emily G Harlow; Sally M Till; Theron A Russell; Lasani S Wijetunge; Peter Kind; Anis Contractor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms Driving the Emergence of Neuronal Hyperexcitability in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Pernille Bülow; Menahem Segal; Gary J Bassell
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Disrupted Cortical State Regulation in a Rat Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Berzhanskaya; Marnie A Phillips; Alexis Gorin; Chongxi Lai; Jing Shen; Matthew T Colonnese
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Differential Excitability of PV and SST Neurons Results in Distinct Functional Roles in Inhibition Stabilization of Up States.

Authors:  Juan L Romero-Sosa; Helen Motanis; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Decreased reproducibility and abnormal experience-dependent plasticity of network dynamics in Fragile X circuits.

Authors:  Helen Motanis; Dean Buonomano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sensory hypo-excitability in a rat model of fetal development in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Berzhanskaya; Marnie A Phillips; Jing Shen; Matthew T Colonnese
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Identification of FMR1-regulated molecular networks in human neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Meng Li; Junha Shin; Ryan D Risgaard; Molly J Parries; Jianyi Wang; Deborah Chasman; Shuang Liu; Sushmita Roy; Anita Bhattacharyya; Xinyu Zhao
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 9.043

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.