Literature DB >> 34253625

Differential Excitability of PV and SST Neurons Results in Distinct Functional Roles in Inhibition Stabilization of Up States.

Juan L Romero-Sosa1,2, Helen Motanis1,3, Dean V Buonomano4,2.   

Abstract

Up states are the best studied example of an emergent neural dynamic regime. Computational models based on a single class of inhibitory neurons indicate that Up states reflect bistable dynamic systems in which positive feedback is stabilized by strong inhibition and predict a paradoxical effect in which increased drive to inhibitory neurons results in decreased inhibitory activity. To date, however, computational models have not incorporated empirically defined properties of parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SST) neurons. Here we first experimentally characterized the frequency-current (F-I) curves of pyramidal (Pyr), PV, and SST neurons from mice of either sex, and confirmed a sharp difference between the threshold and slopes of PV and SST neurons. The empirically defined F-I curves were incorporated into a three-population computational model that simulated the empirically derived firing rates of pyramidal, PV, and SST neurons. Simulations revealed that the intrinsic properties were sufficient to predict that PV neurons are primarily responsible for generating the nontrivial fixed points representing Up states. Simulations and analytical methods demonstrated that while the paradoxical effect is not obligatory in a model with two classes of inhibitory neurons, it is present in most regimes. Finally, experimental tests validated predictions of the model that the Pyr ↔ PV inhibitory loop is stronger than the Pyr ↔ SST loop.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Many cortical computations, such as working memory, rely on the local recurrent excitatory connections that define cortical circuit motifs. Up states are among the best studied examples of neural dynamic regimes that rely on recurrent excitatory excitation. However, this positive feedback must be held in check by inhibition. To address the relative contribution of PV and SST neurons, we characterized the intrinsic input-output differences between these classes of inhibitory neurons and, using experimental and theoretical methods, show that the higher threshold and gain of PV leads to a dominant role in network stabilization.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PV; SST; Up states; inhibition; neural dynamics; neural network model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34253625      PMCID: PMC8387123          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2830-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  110 in total

1.  Origin of slow cortical oscillations in deafferented cortical slabs.

Authors:  I Timofeev; F Grenier; M Bazhenov; T J Sejnowski; M Steriade
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Contribution of intrinsic neuronal factors in the generation of cortically driven electrographic seizures.

Authors:  Igor Timofeev; François Grenier; Mircea Steriade
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters.

Authors:  Astrid A Prinz; Dirk Bucher; Eve Marder
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Paradoxical effects of external modulation of inhibitory interneurons.

Authors:  M V Tsodyks; W E Skaggs; T J Sejnowski; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Complementary control of sensory adaptation by two types of cortical interneurons.

Authors:  Ryan G Natan; John J Briguglio; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Sara I Jones; Mark Aizenberg; Ethan M Goldberg; Maria Neimark Geffen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  The asynchronous state in cortical circuits.

Authors:  Alfonso Renart; Jaime de la Rocha; Peter Bartho; Liad Hollender; Néstor Parga; Alex Reyes; Kenneth D Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Simulation of synaptic depression, posttetanic potentiation, and presynaptic facilitation of synaptic potentials from sensory neurons mediating gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia.

Authors:  K J Gingrich; J H Byrne
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  PKA phosphorylation of AMPA receptor subunits controls synaptic trafficking underlying plasticity.

Authors:  José A Esteban; Song-Hai Shi; Christopher Wilson; Mutsuo Nuriya; Richard L Huganir; Roberto Malinow
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Dense, unspecific connectivity of neocortical parvalbumin-positive interneurons: a canonical microcircuit for inhibition?

Authors:  Adam M Packer; Rafael Yuste
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sensory stimulation shifts visual cortex from synchronous to asynchronous states.

Authors:  Andrew Y Y Tan; Yuzhi Chen; Benjamin Scholl; Eyal Seidemann; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intracortical microstimulation pulse waveform and frequency recruits distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical neuron and neuropil activation.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.043

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.