Literature DB >> 26137148

Response of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix to chemoradiotherapy.

Orit Kaidar-Person1, Sawsan Yosefia1, Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak1.   

Abstract

The aim of the current retrospective study was to investigate the response of advanced cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) to definitive chemoradiotherapy. Uterine cervical cancer is one of the most common cancer types among females, with squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) being the most prevalent histological type. The incidence of cervical AC and its variants has markedly increased in recent decades. The current understanding with regard to the treatment of cervical cancer has been established through studies in which the majority of the patients suffered from SQCC, while only a limited number of studies have focused on the treatment of AC. Therefore, the optimal treatment for uterine cervical AC remains unclear. In the present study, data were collected from the medical files of patients who were diagnosed with advanced uterine cervical AC and treated with chemoradiotherapy between 1998 and 2013. Data were also collected from a group of patients with SQCC for comparison with AC patients in terms of response and survival. A total of 68 uterine cervical cancer cases were included, including 29 AC patients and 39 SQCC patients. Compared with the SQCC subgroup, a higher number of AC patients required surgery following chemoradiotherapy due to a lack of response to the initial treatment (5% vs. 31%, respectively; P=0.0065). After a median follow-up period of 10 years, patients with AC exhibited shorter overall survival (7.4 years vs. 11 years for AC and SQCC groups, respectively; P=0.01). Differences in recurrence (40.7% vs. 34.4%; P=0.79) and disease-free interval (1.2 years vs. 2 years; P=0.11) were not statistically significant. The results indicated that cervical AC is less responsive to chemoradiotherapy compared with SQCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brachytherapy; carcinoma; chemoradiotherapy; high-dose rate; irradiation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26137148      PMCID: PMC4473693          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  11 in total

1.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer.

Authors:  P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries.

Authors:  Sue J Goldie; Lynne Gaffikin; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Amparo Gordillo-Tobar; Carol Levin; Cédric Mahé; Thomas C Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Clinical behaviors and outcomes for adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix treated by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Huang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Chyong-Huey Lai; Ting-Chang Chang; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Steve P Lee; Ji-Hong Hong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study.

Authors:  H O Smith; M F Tiffany; C R Qualls; C R Key
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: why is it different?

Authors:  Keiichi Fujiwara; Bradley Monk; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Obesity as a potential risk factor for adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  James V Lacey; Christine A Swanson; Louise A Brinton; Sean F Altekruse; Willard A Barnes; Patti E Gravitt; Mitchell D Greenberg; Olympia C Hadjimichael; Larry McGowan; Rodrigue Mortel; Peter E Schwartz; Robert J Kurman; Allan Hildesheim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Adenocarcinoma as an independent risk factor for disease recurrence in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  P J Eifel; T W Burke; M Morris; T L Smith
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Clinical outcomes of carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in phase 1/2 clinical trial (protocol 9704).

Authors:  Masaru Wakatsuki; Shingo Kato; Tatsuya Ohno; Kumiko Karasawa; Hiroki Kiyohara; Tomoaki Tamaki; Ken Ando; Hirohiko Tsujii; Takashi Nakano; Tadashi Kamada; Makio Shozu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Differential clinical characteristics, treatment response and prognosis of locally advanced adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jenny Ling-Yu Chen; Chao-Yuan Huang; Yu-Sen Huang; Ruey-Jien Chen; Chun-Wei Wang; Yu-Hsuan Chen; Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng; Ann-Lii Cheng; Sung-Hsin Kuo
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Optimal organ-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) regimen for the treatment of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: a comparison of conventional and IMRT plans.

Authors:  Cathy Menkarios; David Azria; Benoit Laliberté; Carmen Llacer Moscardo; Sophie Gourgou; Claire Lemanski; Jean-Bernard Dubois; Norbert Aillères; Pascal Fenoglietto
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  4 in total

1.  Post-radiotherapy hysterectomy does not benefit females with cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Elen Cristiane Augusto Souza; Daniel Zaidan Santos; Jose Carlos Campos Torres; Diama Bhadra Vale; Joana Froes Bragança; Julio Cesar Teixeira
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26

2.  Neo-adjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix results in significantly different pathological complete response rates.

Authors:  Karen Couvreur; Eline Naert; Emiel De Jaeghere; Philippe Tummers; Amin Makar; Pieter De Visschere; Mieke Van Bockstal; Jo Van Dorpe; Wilfried De Neve; Hannelore Denys; Katrien Vandecasteele
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Survival Comparison Between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma for Radiotherapy-Treated Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Fangjie Chen; Long Chen; Yu Zhang; Lei Shi; Hong'en Xu; Tao Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Poorer prognosis in patients with advanced gastric squamous cell carcinoma compared with adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Case report.

Authors:  Ying Meng; Jiazhao Zhang; Huijun Wang; Yiping Zhang; Ruirui Sun; Zhen Zhang; Fang Gao; Chengsuo Huang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.