Literature DB >> 24666257

Differential clinical characteristics, treatment response and prognosis of locally advanced adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Jenny Ling-Yu Chen1, Chao-Yuan Huang, Yu-Sen Huang, Ruey-Jien Chen, Chun-Wei Wang, Yu-Hsuan Chen, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng, Ann-Lii Cheng, Sung-Hsin Kuo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with cervical locally advanced adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. POPULATION: All patients with cervical SCC (n = 35), AC or ASC (n = 194) with FIGO stage ≥IIB who received definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) from January 1995 to December 2009.
METHOD: Medical and histopathological record review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Compared with the SCC subgroup, patients with AC/ASC were significantly younger (p = 0.007), more of them without clinical symptoms were diagnosed by abnormal Pap smear findings (p = 0.043), and less responded to treatment (p = 0.018). After a median follow-up of 59.3 months, patients with AC/ASC had worse 5-year PFS (30.0% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.044), worse 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (41.5% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.005), and trends toward worse 5-year local recurrence-free survival (64.4% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.165) and worse 5-year OS (41.3% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.090) than patients with SCC. In univariate analysis, early FIGO stage and complete treatment response were significantly associated with PFS and OS. Histology of non-AC/ASC and Point A biologically equivalent doses in 2-Gy fractions >85 Gy were significantly associated with better PFS, and CCRT was significantly associated with better OS. In multivariate analysis, complete treatment response and early FIGO stage remained significant factors for predicting better PFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical AC/ASC may be more aggressive than is SCC. For cervical AC/ASC, more comprehensively effective treatments are warranted.
© 2014 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; adenosquamous carcinoma; cervix; radiotherapy; squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24666257     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  29 in total

1.  Combination of external beam radiotherapy and Californium (Cf)-252 neutron intracavity brachytherapy is more effective in control of cervical squamous cell carcinoma than that of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yanli Xiong; Jia Liu; Shu Chen; Qian Zhou; Wenjing Xu; Chen Tang; Yonghong Chen; Mei Yang; Xin Lei
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Response of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix to chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Orit Kaidar-Person; Sawsan Yosefia; Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; San-Gang Wu; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Qiong-Hua Chen; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Integrated analysis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma cohorts from three continents reveals conserved subtypes of prognostic significance.

Authors:  Ankur Chakravarthy; Ian Reddin; Stephen Henderson; Cindy Dong; Nerissa Kirkwood; Maxmilan Jeyakumar; Daniela Rothschild Rodriguez; Natalia Gonzalez Martinez; Jacqueline McDermott; Xiaoping Su; Nagayasau Egawa; Christina S Fjeldbo; Vilde Eide Skingen; Heidi Lyng; Mari Kyllesø Halle; Camilla Krakstad; Afschin Soleiman; Susanne Sprung; Matt Lechner; Peter J I Ellis; Mark Wass; Martin Michaelis; Heidi Fiegl; Helga Salvesen; Gareth J Thomas; John Doorbar; Kerry Chester; Andrew Feber; Tim R Fenton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  The value of HPV genotypes combined with clinical indicators in the classification of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zhimin He; Rongsheng Chen; Shangying Hu; Yajiao Zhang; Yang Liu; Chengwei Li; Fajin Lv; Zhibo Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Long-term Outcomes of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Using Paclitaxel and Cisplatin.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Arakaki; Takuro Ariga; Joichi Heianna; Yuko Shimoji; Tadaharu Nakasone; Yusuke Taira; Tomoko Nakamoto; Takuma Ooyama; Wataru Kudaka; Itomi Kaneshima; Kumiko Nishihira; Keiko Mekaru; Yoichi Aoki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Classical and non-classical HLA class I aberrations in primary cervical squamous- and adenocarcinomas and paired lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Debbie M Ferns; A Marijne Heeren; Sanne Samuels; Maaike C G Bleeker; Tanja D de Gruijl; Gemma G Kenter; Ekaterina S Jordanova
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 8.  Understanding Complete Pathologic Response in Oesophageal Cancer: Implications for Management and Survival.

Authors:  K E O'Sullivan; E T Hurley; J P Hurley
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Biology and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Chemoradiotherapy in combination with radical surgery is associated with better outcome in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Dan Zheng; Hua-Ping Mou; Peng Diao; Xiao-Ming Li; Chuan-Li Zhang; Jing Jiang; Jia-Lian Chen; Li-Shuai Wang; Qiu Wang; Guang-Yuan Zhou; Jie Chen; Chuan Lin; Zhi-Ping Yuan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.