Literature DB >> 26136498

Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae) in its Native Range Consists of Two Sympatric Cryptic Lineages as Revealed by Mitochondrial COI Gene Sequences.

J Wang1, Y Yu1, L-L Li2, D Guo3, Y-L Tao3, D Chu4.   

Abstract

The genetic differentiation and genetic structure of the peach fruit moth, Carposina sasakii Matsumura (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae), was investigated in China, where the moth is native. The mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene of 180 individuals from 16 collections were sequenced and analyzed. The results showed that two sympatric and cryptic mtDNA lineages existed within C. sasakii in China. The genetic differentiation has significant correlation with the geographical distance, but has no evidence for host plant associations. Our results of haplotype distribution suggest that the C. sasakii individuals can naturally move between areas, while the movement of individuals between long-distance locations may be associated with human activities such as the transport of fruit. Finally, an mitochondrial COI gene PCR-RFLP method was developed to differentiate the two cryptic mtDNA lineages within C. sasakii, which provides rapid and reliable tool for the future research of the two lineages.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carposina sasakii Matsumura; cryptic mtDNA lineages; genetic differentiation; mitochondrial COI gene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26136498      PMCID: PMC4535581          DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iev063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Sci        ISSN: 1536-2442            Impact factor:   1.857


The peach fruit moth, Carposina sasakii Matsumura, is an important fruit pest in Korea, Japan, China, and Russia Far East (Liu et al. 1997; Kim et al. 2000). The moth larvae can damage more than 20 kinds of fruit including peach, apricot, hawthorn, apple, pear, jujube, and wild jujube (Kim et al. 2001; Kim and Lee 2002; Ishiguri and Shirai 2004; Xu and Hua 2004). In China, C. sasakii has been recorded from 24 provinces (Liu et al. 1997). Some collections of this pest were considered host biotypes (Hua and Hua 1995) because emergence time, oviposition habitat, and damage characteristics seemed to be specific to the C. sasakii associated with particular hosts. The genetic differentiation of these purported host biotypes has been studied using esterase isozyme patterns (Hua and Hua 1995) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Xu and Hua 2004). Using RAPD method, Xu and Hua (2004) documented genetic differentiation among C. sasakii collected from apple, hawthorn, peach, apricot, jujube, and wild jujube. The specimens associated with apricot differed the most markedly from other host races, and the authors suggested that it should be considered as a good species. However, the genetic differentiation of the pest throughout China has not been well studied, which is indispensable to understand the evolution of the pest in its native ranges. The aim of this research was to investigate the genetic structure of the peach fruit moth and its relationship with geographical distance and host plants by using the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene as a marker. The mitochondrial COI gene marker has been widely used for species identification, for determining the genetic structure and differentiation (De Barro et al. 2011). In this article, we first analyze the genetic differentiation and haplotype distribution of C. sasakii in China, the native area of the pest, using samples collected from a range of host plants. Second, we calculate the genetic diversity of different host collections. Third, the correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance was analyzed. Finally, an mitochondrial COI gene PCR-RFLP method was developed to distinguish between the lineages within C. sasakii.

Materials and Methods

Insect Samples

In the autumn of 2010, C. sasakii larvae were collected from a range of orchards in 16 main fruit-growing regions in China (Fig. 1). Collected specimens were first identified morphologically followed the description by Liu et al. (2011). In total, there were 16 collections (Table 1). The larvae were put in 95% ethanol and then stored at −20°C prior to DNA extraction.
Fig. 1.

The 16 collection sites of Carposina sasakii in China.

Table 1.

Carposina sasakii collections from China

Collection codeCollection siteHost plantCollection dateLineages markers
Individuals of COI sequences
Individuals of COI PCR-RFLP
TotalLineage ILineage IITotalLineage ILineage II
DLDaLian, LiaoNingApple8/20101210212102
SYShenYang, LiaoNingApple9/2010642642
MDJMuDanJiang, HeiLongJiangApple8/2010826826
XYXianYang, ShaanXiApple9/2010808808
JZJinZhong, ShanXiJujube9/2010505505
LSLiangShan, SiChuanApple9/2010505505
LKLongKou, ShanDongApple8/20101717017170
NYNingYang, ShanDongJujube9/20101111011110
FCFeiCheng, ShanDongPeach8/20101918119181
LYLaiYang, ShanDongApple9/20101881018810
JNJiNan, ShanDongApple9/201011741174
TATaiAn, ShanDongJujube9/2010440440
YTYanTai, ShanDongApple9/20101616016160
LWPLaiWu, ShanDongApple9/20101301313013
LWZLaiWu, ShanDongJujube9/2010808808
LWSLaiWu, ShanDongWild jujube9/20101901919019

Note: all specimens were larvae and were collected in October 2010.

The 16 collection sites of Carposina sasakii in China. Carposina sasakii collections from China Note: all specimens were larvae and were collected in October 2010.

DNA Extraction, PCR, and Mitochondrial Sequencing

DNA was extracted from a single larva using the DNAzol kit (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) following the manufacturer’s specifications. COI fragments were amplified from 180 individuals using the primers LCO1490 (5′- GGTCAACAAATCATAAA GATATTGG -3′) and HCO2198 (5′- TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCA AAAAATCA -3′) (Folmer et al. 1994). Each PCR reaction (25 µl) contained 2 µl of template DNA, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (extracted from Thermus Aquaticus) (Biomed biotechnology Co. Ltd), 2.5 µl of MgCl2 (2.5 mmol/l), 2 µl of dNTPs (10 mmol/l), 1 µl of 20 µmol/l of each primer, and 2.5 µl of 10 × PCR buffer. PCR amplifications began with 94°C denaturation for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of 94°C denaturation for 1 min, 52°C annealing for 1 min, and 72°C extension for 2 min; and a final 72°C extension for 10 min. The PCR product was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR should have yielded an ∼710 bp fragment (Folmer et al. 1994). The PCR product was purified and then sequenced directly. The 180 sequences were aligned with Clustal W (Thompson et al. 1994) and were then checked for insertion and deletion (indel). The final 588-bp sequences (the alignment length) were used to analyze the lineage-specific restriction enzyme sites and the genetic structure of collection.DNA identification As precise identification of young and/or old larvae of C. sasakii and similar fruits-infesting species are difficult or may be impossible practically (Sony et al. 2009; Hada and Sekine 2011), we conducted a phylogenetic analysis using the COI sequences collected in the present study and the homologous GenBank sequences of C. sasakii as well allied species available by 1 July 2012. Based on the resulting phylogenetic tree, the haplotypes were involved in the monophyletic group of “C. sasakii” were retained and considered as C. sasakii.

Genetic Structure Analysis

A Median joining (MJ) network was calculated and drawn with the program NETWORK 4.5 (Bandelt et al. 1999) to investigate the possible relationships among haplotyes of C. sasakii. Genetic parameters for mitochondrial were estimated for the different collections from China using DnaSP 5.0 (Librado and Rozas 2009). The parameters included the number of polymorphic (segregating) sites (S), the total number of mutations (η), the average number of nucleotide differences (K), the number of haplotypes (H), haplotype diversity (Hd), nucleotide diversity (π), defined as the average number of pairwise nucleotide differences per site), and the nucleotide diversity with Jukes and Cantor correction [π (JC)] within each collection and region. The ARLEQUIN version 3.1 (Excoffier et al. 2005) was used for pairwise F estimation (a measure of genetic differentiation between populations) among populations, and for analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and pairwise haplotype distances (P-distance) were calculated by Mega 5.0 (Tamura et al. 2011). Gene flow within and among populations was approximated as Nm [analogous to M = (1/F – 1)/2] (Slatkin 1993), where Nm is a measure of the extent of gene flow in an island model at equilibrium and was calculated by Dnasp 5.0 (Librado and Rozas 2009). The correlation between F and geographical distance of all populations was estimated using the Mantel test of IBD.1.5.2 (isolation-by-distance) (Bohonak 2002). The regression was made using F against geographical distance. Pairwise geographic distances (straight-line distance) between collections were calculated by longitude and latitude.

Identification of Lineage-Specific Restriction Enzyme Sites and Determination of Lineages Based on Mitochondrial COI Gene PCR-RFLP

The nucleotide differences in the 37 mitochondrial COI gene haplotype sequences that were detected were analyzed to select a restriction endonuclease for distinguishing among sequences. A restriction endonuclease, BsaJI (NEB, MA) that cleaves DNA at “CCNNGG” sites was selected. All 180 individuals from the 16 collections were used to test the utility of the BsaJI-based PCR-RFLP. A 10-µl volume of PCR product was digested at 60°C for 2 h with 2 units of BsaJI. The BsaJI-digested PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.0% agarosegel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Based on the sizes of bands produced by BsaJI digestion, the lineage of each individual was determined.

Results

Genetic Differentiation and Gene Flow Between Collections

A total of 37 haplotypes of mitochondrial COI gene were detected and deposited in GenBank (JN974425–JN974452, KC815966–KC815974), and they were grouped into two clusters as showed by the haplotype network (Fig. 2). One cluster (code: cluster I) included 21 haplotypes (H1, H2, H4, H6, H14–H24, and H26–H31) that were distributed in 10 of the 16 host collections; cluster I haplotypes were detected in samples from MuDanJiang (MDJ), DaLian (DL), ShenYang (SY), LongKou (LK), NingYang (NY), FeiCheng (FC), LaiYang (LY), JiNan (JN), TaiAn (TA), and YanTai (YT). Another cluster (code: cluster II) included 16 haplotypes (H3, H5, H25, H7–H13, H32–H37) distributed in 12 of the 16 host collections; cluster II haplotypes were detected in samples from MuDanJiang (MDJ), DaLian (DL), ShenYang (SY), XianYang (XY), JinZhong (JZ), JiNan (JN), FeiCheng (FC), LaiYang (LY), LaiWu (LWP, LWS and LWZ), and LiangShan (LS).
Fig. 2.

The C. sasakii mitochondrial COI gene network constructed with the program Network 4.5. The area of each colored pie diagram reflects the number of individuals of each haplotype, and colored segments represent the proportion or the number of haplotypes that occur from each sampling collection. The code of the haplotype is “Hap” plus “number”.

The C. sasakii mitochondrial COI gene network constructed with the program Network 4.5. The area of each colored pie diagram reflects the number of individuals of each haplotype, and colored segments represent the proportion or the number of haplotypes that occur from each sampling collection. The code of the haplotype is “Hap” plus “number”. The four collections labeled as LK, NY, TA, and YT contained only cluster I haplotypes, and these were designated as lineage I. The six collections labeled as XY, JZ, LS, LWP, LWZ, and LWS contained only cluster II haplotypes, and these were designated as lineage II. The other six collections (DL, SY, MDJ, FC, LY, and JN) contained a mixture of cluster I and II haplotypes. Both cluster I and II haplotypes were found in the collections from apple, jujube, and peach, only cluster II were included in wild jujube. When F ranged from 0 to 0.05, the genetic differentiation is small; F ranged from 0.05 to 0.15, the genetic differentiation between populations is moderate; F ranged from 0.15 to 0.25, the genetic differentiation is large; F > 0.25, the genetic differentiation is very large (Weight 1978). Among the 120 pairwise F (Table 2), 85 values were higher than 0.25 and 87 values were significant, indicating that most of populations were highly differentiated from other populations. Correlation between geographic distance and genetic distance was tested by isolation-by-distance (IBD) (Fig. 3). The test showed a significant positive relationship between pairwise F values and geographic distance (r = 0.3785; P = 0.0140) among all of the collections.
Table 2.

Pairwise F (below diagonal) and gene flow (above diagonal) of C. sasakii based on COI sequences

DLSYMDJXYJZLSLKNYFCLYJNTAYTLWPLWZLWS
DL9.700.650.400.310.172.744.533.791.252.3110.521.800.130.140.11
SY0.000001.270.550.330.162.311.501.901.982.352.231.800.150.130.14
MDJ0.376810.161120.560.320.190.530.280.360.950.610.410.520.310.130.13
XY0.514380.388290.397141.080.310.310.210.301.760.780.280.270.320.310.30
JZ0.623850.527660.563080.213850.110.270.150.273.380.840.150.242.011.632.22
LS0.814880.729410.738100.630040.781250.160.070.150.600.280.040.140.030.000.04
LK0.089910.086360.453710.603070.691300.865441.451.030.851.063.658.710.110.130.09
NY0.016470.111590.582280.660860.743220.915600.2198410.340.851.4924.261.030.060.060.06
FC0.051380.127210.564500.614230.694820.879480.28721-0.017600.842.099.560.790.110.130.09
LY0.259260.188820.353220.207430.127970.635070.335690.378250.333375.361.730.781.171.521.00
JN0.097760.076790.399310.335780.357770.713130.255900.176100.120090.022742.730.870.350.400.32
TA0.000000.009760.521940.621390.709550.888890.066850.000000.000000.327840.128292.440.070.040.08
YT0.154570.125510.446400.624500.706900.876770.000000.290890.352220.361200.303120.134100.100.110.08
LWP0.773850.693800.736010.526600.007510.959650.825950.877260.832750.292330.530400.847840.836925.038.08
LWZ0.800360.718370.761900.562770.000001.000000.852420.906120.861110.309710.556250.876190.863530.0416715.19
LWS0.775650.694670.735900.529020.000000.963770.827480.879870.835530.288720.531440.850170.838580.000000.00000

The values in bold indicates P < 0.05.

Fig. 3.

Correlation between F and distance (km) for pair-wise comparisons of 16 geographical C. sasakii populations.

Pairwise F (below diagonal) and gene flow (above diagonal) of C. sasakii based on COI sequences The values in bold indicates P < 0.05. Correlation between F and distance (km) for pair-wise comparisons of 16 geographical C. sasakii populations. Results of the estimates of gene flow (Table 2) revealed that TA and NY have the highest gene flow (Nm = 24.26), and LWS and LWZ have also the relatively high gene flow (Nm = 15.19). Although LS and LW collections (WZ, LWP, LWS) have the low gene flow between them (the Nm between LS and LWZ, LWP, LWS was 0.00, 0.03 and 0.04, respectively).

Geographic Distribution of Haplotypes and Genetic Diversity

Ten of the 16 collections were found harboring unique haplotypes. In the MDJ, FC, LK, LY, and YT collections, 25.00, 15.79, 11.76, and 18.75% of the individuals, respectively, proved to be unique haplotypes, respectively. In the JZ, XY, JN, LWS, and LWP collections, 20.00, 25.00, 18.18, 15.79, and 15.38% of the individuals, belonged to the unique haplotypes, respectively. The diversity indexes of LS collection and LW collections (LWZ, LWS, and LWP) were much lower than those in the other collections (Table 3). For instance, the Hd values of collections LWS, LWP, and LWZ were less than 0.42308, while the Hd values of the other seven collections were greater than 0.6000.
Table 3.

Diversity indexes of C. sasakii collections based on COI sequences

Collection (number of individuals)SηHHdπKπ(JC)
DL(12)101040.742420.005773.393940.00582
SY(6)9930.733330.007894.600000.00782
MDJ(8)101040.642860.006683.928570.00674
XY(8)7740.750000.006133.607140.00167
JZ(5)7730.700000.004762.800000.00479
LS(5)0010.000000.000000.000000.00000
LK(17)8880.867860.004582.691180.00460
NY(11)5540.600000.002841.672730.00286
FC(19)161690.730990.004082.397660.00408
LY(18)222370.738560.010836.366010.01095
JN(11)121250.781820.008785.163640.00887
TA(4)4430.833330.003682.166670.00370
YT(16)9970.791670.004322.541670.00434
LWP(13)3340.423080.001000.587940.00010
LWZ(8)0010.000000.000000.000000.00000
LWS(9)5550.385960.385960.526320.00090

Note: S, number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; η, total number of mutations; H, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide differences; π (JC), nucleotide diversity with Jukes and Cantor correction.

Diversity indexes of C. sasakii collections based on COI sequences Note: S, number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; η, total number of mutations; H, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide differences; π (JC), nucleotide diversity with Jukes and Cantor correction. Results of AMOVA showed that there was significant genetic structure of C. sasakii among collections (Table 4), 55.96% (P < 0.01) of the variation was among collections and 44.04% was within the collections, which indicated that a considerable portion of the variation was observed among collections.
Table 4.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) in collections of C. sasakii

Source of variationd.f.Sum of squaresVariance componentsPercentage of variation
Among collections14301.9891.74312Va55.96*
Within collections161220.8811.37193Vb44.04
Total175522.8693.11505

*, P < 0.01.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) in collections of C. sasakii *, P < 0.01.

Utility of BsaJI-Based Mitochondrial COI Gene PCR-RFLP

The restriction endonuclease BsaJI cleaves DNA at “CCNNGG”, a pattern that was present in haplotypes from lineage II but not in haplotypes of lineage I (Fig. 4). Thus, BsaJI digested the 83 mitochondrial COI gene PCR products of individuals in lineage II but did not digest the 97 mitochondrial COI gene PCR products of individuals in lineage I (Table 1; Fig. 5). These results showed that the lineage of each individual could be determined based on the sizes of bands produced by BsaJI digestion.
Fig. 4.

Alignment of 37 haplotypes representing the COI sequences of 180 Chinese individuals of C. sasakii. Sequence alignment was generated with the Clustal W program. The BsaJI (CCNNGG) recognition site is boxed.

Fig. 5.

Typical BsaJI-based mitochondrial COI gene PCR-RFLP gel profiles of C. sasakii individuals. Note: lanes 1–7 are from individuals belong to lineage I; lanes 8–12 are from individuals belong to lineage II; M, 100-bp ladder.

Alignment of 37 haplotypes representing the COI sequences of 180 Chinese individuals of C. sasakii. Sequence alignment was generated with the Clustal W program. The BsaJI (CCNNGG) recognition site is boxed. Typical BsaJI-based mitochondrial COI gene PCR-RFLP gel profiles of C. sasakii individuals. Note: lanes 1–7 are from individuals belong to lineage I; lanes 8–12 are from individuals belong to lineage II; M, 100-bp ladder.

Discussion

Understanding the genetic differentiation of pest insects is fundamental to understanding pest biology and management. Recent studies have shown that genetically differentiated lineages can differ in adaptation to environments or in invasive ability (Scheffer and Lewis 2005; Winkler et al. 2008). For example, two genetically differentiated lineages of the copepod Eurytemora affinis in the St. Lawrence River in North America have been identified. Although the lineage that primarily occurs in the central portion of the St. Lawrence River estuary has invaded freshwater lakes, the lineage in the upstream reaches of the estuary and downstream salt marshes has not (Winkler et al. 2008). The dipteran Liriomyza sativae has at least three genetic lineages including sativae-A, sativae-L, and sativae-W. However, only the sativae-W lineage was found to be invasive (Scheffer and Lewis 2005). Our analysis of mitochondrial COI gene revealed that the peach fruit moth, C. sasakii, has two cryptic mtDNA lineages in China, where it is native. Until now, the possible difference in biology (or ecology, or physiology) of the C. sasakii lineages was unknown. Our results showed the genetic differentiation has significant correlation with the geographical distance (Fig. 3), but has no evidence for host plant associations. Host plant formation is an important process studied in many species that may explain their genetic structure (Inbar et al. 2004; Ros and Breeuwer 2007). Hua and Hua (1995) studied the esterase isozymes of three host biotypes from jujube, wide jujube, and apple, respectively. They found a great similarity exist between C. sasakii in hosts of jujube and wide jujube, while the two have a great differentiation with host of apple. The other patterns of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs) (Xu and Hua 2004) suggested the existence of two host biotypes, the C. sasakii in apricot was considered to be a new species with long genetic distance to the other hosts of C. sasakii (the P-distance between the two biotypes ranged from 0.453 to 0.673); they have suggested that genetic differentiation within C. sasakii was closely associated with host-plant identity. Although pairwise genetic distance between haplotypes (P-distance) in four host plant of apple, peach, jujube, and wild jujube ranged from 0.0016 to 0.0313 (data not shown) based on Tajima-Nei model, showed no biotypes were found in our study. Phylogenetics is one approach to assess the association between pest and host plants (Inbar et al. 2004; Ros and Breeuwer 2007). Although the genetic differentiation based on mitochondrial COI gene in the current study revealed the existence of two lineages, the lineages, however, were not closely associated with host identity. Our study revealed that the C. sasakii collections from apple, jujube, and peach contained haplotypes from both cluster I and II. The identical mitochondrial COI gene haplotypes can also be found on different host plant species, that means there were no closely correlation between mitochondrial divergence and host identity (Fig. 2). The distribution of unique haplotypes within different collections showed that gene flow between collections was highly variable. The data suggested individuals naturally move between areas. For example, the locations of TA, NY, and FC are close to each other, and all of the haplotypes in the TA and NY collections were found in the FC collection. Similarly, all of the haplotypes in the LWZ collection were also found in the LWP and LWS collections. On the other hand, the movement of individuals between long-distance locations seems to be closely associated with human activities. For example, Hap11, a major haplotype in LW collections (representing 82.5% of all individual in the LW collections), could also be found in JZ (60.0%), FC (5.3%) and LY (50.0%) collections but not in JN, TA, and NY collections. As the map of Shandong indicates (Fig. 1), the distance among JN, TA, and NY are closer than that among JZ, FC, and LY. The movement of individuals with Hap11 among areas may be associated with human activities such as the transport of fruit. The genetic diversity indexes of collections are variable greatly, which may be affected by the sample size. In the future, more individuals in each collection are needed to evaluate the genetic diversity. Determining whether the two cryptic mtDNA lineages differ in biological and ecological traits will require additional research, and the nuclear gene maybe important to verify this hypothesis. The information from that research should increase our understanding of C. sasakii evolution and management. The current paper demonstrates that the BsaJI-based PCR-RFLP can be used to differentiate the two cryptic mtDNA lineages within C. sasakii. The method should be useful for the reliable and rapid monitoring of the population dynamics of the two lineages in the field.
  11 in total

1.  Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies.

Authors:  H J Bandelt; P Forster; A Röhl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  IBD (Isolation by Distance): a program for analyses of isolation by distance.

Authors:  A J Bohonak
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  P Librado; J Rozas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Heterogeneity within the native range: population genetic analyses of sympatric invasive and noninvasive clades of the freshwater invading copepod Eurytemora affinis.

Authors:  Gesche Winkler; Julian J Dodson; Carol Eunmi Lee
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Bemisia tabaci: a statement of species status.

Authors:  Paul J De Barro; Shu-Sheng Liu; Laura M Boykin; Adam B Dinsdale
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 19.686

7.  The evolution of host plant manipulation by insects: molecular and ecological evidence from gall-forming aphids on Pistacia.

Authors:  M Inbar; M Wink; D Wool
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

9.  Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.

Authors:  Laurent Excoffier; Guillaume Laval; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.625

Review 10.  Spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) mitochondrial COI phylogeny reviewed: host plant relationships, phylogeography, reproductive parasites and barcoding.

Authors:  Vera I D Ros; Johannes A J Breeuwer
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 2.132

View more
  5 in total

1.  Photoreceptor degeneration in a new Cacna1f mutant mouse model.

Authors:  Xufeng Dai; Shiyi Pang; Jieping Wang; Bernard FitzMaurice; Jijing Pang; Bo Chang
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Possible Source Populations of the White-backed Planthopper in the Greater Mekong Subregion Revealed by Mitochondrial DNA Analysis.

Authors:  Xiang-Yong Li; Dong Chu; Yan-Qiong Yin; Xue-Qing Zhao; Ai-Dong Chen; Sathya Khay; Bounneuang Douangboupha; Mu Mu Kyaw; Manita Kongchuensin; Vien Vinh Ngo; Chung Huy Nguyen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Patterns of genetic variation among geographic and host-plant associated populations of the peach fruit moth Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae).

Authors:  You-Zhu Wang; Bing-Yan Li; Ary Anthony Hoffmann; Li-Jun Cao; Ya-Jun Gong; Wei Song; Jia-Ying Zhu; Shu-Jun Wei
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Mitochondrial DNA markers reveal high genetic diversity and strong genetic differentiation in populations of Dendrolimus kikuchii Matsumura (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae).

Authors:  Qiulei Men; Guoxi Xue; Dan Mu; Qingling Hu; Minyi Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development and Characterization of Novel Microsatellite Markers for the Peach Fruit Moth Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae) Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  You-Zhu Wang; Li-Jun Cao; Jia-Ying Zhu; Shu-Jun Wei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.