Pieter Julien Luc De Visschere1, Leslie Naesens2, Louis Libbrecht3, Charles Van Praet4, Nicolaas Lumen4, Valérie Fonteyne5, Eva Pattyn2, Geert Villeirs2. 1. Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, 0 DPP, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium. pieter.devisschere@uzgent.be. 2. Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, 0 DPP, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium. 3. Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium. 4. Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 0P3, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium. 5. Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, 0P8, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the characteristics of prostate cancers (PrCa) detected following negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and thirty patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (mean 11.9 μg/l) underwent mpMRI of the prostate at 1.5 Tesla with endorectal coil. The characteristics of all PrCa detected within 2 years after a negative mpMRI were analysed. Primary Gleason grade 4 or any grade 5 PrCa were considered high-grade (HG), Gleason score 3 + 4 intermediate grade (IG) and Gleason score ≤3 + 3 low-grade (LG). Tumour size was considered 'small' when <1 cm on radical prostatectomy specimen or limited to ≤2 cores on prostate biopsy. RESULTS: mpMRI was negative in 391 patients (47.1 %). In 124 patients (31.7 %) PrCa was detected within 2 years. Eighty-four (67.7 %) were LG, 22 (17.7 %) IG and 18 (14.5 %) HG. 119 (96.0 %) of the missed PrCa were organ-confined. The negative predictive value was 95.4 % (373/391) for HG PrCa. Among the 18 missed HG PrCa, 15 (83.3 %) were organ-confined and 12 (66.6 %) were small. CONCLUSION: The majority of missed tumours on mpMRI were low grade and organ-confined. In patients with elevated PSA and a negative mpMRI, consideration could be given to continued surveillance rather than immediate biopsy. KEY POINTS: • The majority of missed prostate cancers were low grade and organ-confined. • In patients with a negative mpMRI a biopsy may be postponed. • mpMRI had a negative predictive value of 95.4 % for high-grade prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the characteristics of prostate cancers (PrCa) detected following negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and thirty patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (mean 11.9 μg/l) underwent mpMRI of the prostate at 1.5 Tesla with endorectal coil. The characteristics of all PrCa detected within 2 years after a negative mpMRI were analysed. Primary Gleason grade 4 or any grade 5 PrCa were considered high-grade (HG), Gleason score 3 + 4 intermediate grade (IG) and Gleason score ≤3 + 3 low-grade (LG). Tumour size was considered 'small' when <1 cm on radical prostatectomy specimen or limited to ≤2 cores on prostate biopsy. RESULTS: mpMRI was negative in 391 patients (47.1 %). In 124 patients (31.7 %) PrCa was detected within 2 years. Eighty-four (67.7 %) were LG, 22 (17.7 %) IG and 18 (14.5 %) HG. 119 (96.0 %) of the missed PrCa were organ-confined. The negative predictive value was 95.4 % (373/391) for HG PrCa. Among the 18 missed HG PrCa, 15 (83.3 %) were organ-confined and 12 (66.6 %) were small. CONCLUSION: The majority of missed tumours on mpMRI were low grade and organ-confined. In patients with elevated PSA and a negative mpMRI, consideration could be given to continued surveillance rather than immediate biopsy. KEY POINTS: • The majority of missed prostate cancers were low grade and organ-confined. • In patients with a negative mpMRI a biopsy may be postponed. • mpMRI had a negative predictive value of 95.4 % for high-grade prostate cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Prostate; Prostatic neoplasms
Authors: James E Thompson; Daniel Moses; Ron Shnier; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; Lee Ponsky; Marley Pulbrook; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Andrew Hayen; Phillip D Stricker Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-02-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Deanna L Langer; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Andrew J Evans; Laibao Sun; Martin J Yaffe; John Trachtenberg; Masoom A Haider Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Anwar R Padhani; Jelle Barentsz; Geert Villeirs; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Daniel J Margolis; Baris Turkbey; Harriet C Thoeny; François Cornud; Masoom A Haider; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Sadhna Verma; Jeffrey C Weinreb Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Raphaële Renard-Penna; Morgan Roupret; Eva Compérat; François Rozet; Benjamin Granger; Johann Barkatz; Marc Olivier Bitker; Olivier Lucidarme; Olivier Cussenot; Pierre Mozer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Baris Turkbey; Anna M Brown; Sandeep Sankineni; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Samuel Borofsky; Arvin K George; Sonia Gaur; Marcelino Bernardo; Matthew D Greer; Francesca V Mertan; Myles Taffel; Vanesa Moreno; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Soleen Ghafoor; Daniel Stocker; Olivio F Donati; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Anton S Becker; Borna K Barth; Daniel Eberli Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-11
Authors: David Eldred-Evans; Henry Tam; Heminder Sokhi; Anwar R Padhani; Mathias Winkler; Hashim U Ahmed Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 14.432