Literature DB >> 26134159

Coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of chest pain: current status and future directions.

Arthur Nasis1, Ian T Meredith2, James D Cameron2, Sujith K Seneviratne2.   

Abstract

Chest pain is one of the most common presenting symptoms leading to presentation to medical clinics and Emergency Departments worldwide. Defining the nature and etiology of chest pain can pose a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians, despite the availability of several diagnostic algorithms and guidelines to assist them in evaluating these patients. Most investigations in patients with acute chest pain are initially performed to either exclude or diagnose and manage potentially life-threatening conditions such as acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection. In cases of stable chest pain syndromes, the focus shifts to determining the presence, extent and severity of coronary artery disease. In recent years, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is being increasingly used worldwide in the assessment of both stable and acute chest pain syndromes. This review evaluates the current evidence regarding the clinical utility of CCTA in the stable and acute chest pain settings and outlines the latest advances in CCTA techniques, including functional assessment of coronary stenoses, and their potential clinical application to improve patient care in a cost-effective manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest pain; Coronary artery disease; Coronary computed tomography angiography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26134159     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0698-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  121 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G A Beller; B L Zaret
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  James K Min; Amanda Gilmore; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Ken O'Day
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Brian S Ko; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Michael Leung; Paul R Antonis; Arthur Nasis; Marcus Crossett; Sarah A Hope; Sam J Lehman; John Troupis; Tony DeFrance; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population.

Authors:  Charles V Pollack; Frank D Sites; Frances S Shofer; Keara L Sease; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study.

Authors:  Arthur Nasis; Brian S Ko; Michael C Leung; Paul R Antonis; Dee Nandurkar; Dennis T Wong; Leo Kyi; James D Cameron; John M Troupis; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Evaluation of myocardial CT perfusion in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: comparison with SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Gudrun Maria Feuchtner; Fabian Plank; Constantino Pena; Juan Battle; James Min; Jonathon Leipsic; Troy Labounty; Warren Janowitz; Barry Katzen; Jack Ziffer; Ricardo C Cury
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Prognosis of patients with mild-moderate coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Hikmet Yorgun; Uğur Canpolat; Kudret Aytemir; Tuncay Hazırolan; Hamza Sunman; Ahmet Hakan Ateş; Levent Sahiner; Sevilay Karahan; Ergün Barış Kaya; Lale Tokgözoğlu; Giray Kabakçı; Ali Oto
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Cost-effectiveness of follow-up of pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on cardiac computed tomographic angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Alexander Goehler; Pamela M McMahon; Heidi S Lumish; Carol C Wu; Vidit Munshi; Michael Gilmore; Jonathan H Chung; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Daniel Mark; Quynh A Truong; G Scott Gazelle; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.