| Literature DB >> 26134148 |
Gang Liang1, Qin Ai2, Diqiu Yu1.
Abstract
Integrating class="Chemical">carbon (C),Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26134148 PMCID: PMC4488870 DOI: 10.1038/srep11813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Responses of seedlings and small RNAs to nutrient deficiency.
(A). Ten-day-old seedlings grown under full nutrient (FN) and nutrient deficiency (–C, –N, and –S) conditions. (B). Abundance of small RNA sequences with different sizes.
Summary statistics of small RNAs.
| FN | −C | −N | −S | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| class | Unique sRNA | % | Total sRNA | % | Unique sRNA | % | Total sRNA | % | Unique sRNA | % | Total sRNA | % | Unique sRNA | % | Total sRNA | % |
| exon_antisense | 48330 | 2.24% | 153442 | 1.58% | 43512 | 2.36% | 113536 | 1.05% | 47232 | 2.43% | 151940 | 1.48% | 51635 | 2.25% | 142820 | 1.46% |
| exon_sense | 92342 | 4.28% | 199960 | 2.07% | 89447 | 4.86% | 168447 | 1.55% | 99726 | 5.13% | 194406 | 1.89% | 99244 | 4.32% | 198699 | 2.03% |
| intron_antisense | 16696 | 0.77% | 36220 | 0.37% | 14950 | 0.81% | 30837 | 0.28% | 17120 | 0.88% | 41205 | 0.40% | 18643 | 0.81% | 42446 | 0.43% |
| intron_sense | 16028 | 0.74% | 41067 | 0.42% | 14763 | 0.80% | 35726 | 0.33% | 16174 | 0.83% | 41399 | 0.40% | 18370 | 0.80% | 47541 | 0.48% |
| miRNA | 3395 | 0.16% | 3909038 | 40.38% | 2850 | 0.15% | 5344206 | 49.21% | 2794 | 0.14% | 3968586 | 38.58% | 3092 | 0.13% | 3378379 | 34.44% |
| rRNA | 78278 | 3.63% | 914877 | 9.45% | 78036 | 4.24% | 926000 | 8.53% | 67848 | 3.49% | 885685 | 8.61% | 69497 | 3.03% | 758028 | 7.73% |
| repeat | 808137 | 37.43% | 1671863 | 17.27% | 641922 | 34.88% | 1311398 | 12.07% | 697382 | 35.90% | 1627032 | 15.82% | 856427 | 37.30% | 1830010 | 18.65% |
| snRNA | 2142 | 0.10% | 4048 | 0.04% | 1908 | 0.10% | 3738 | 0.03% | 3698 | 0.19% | 10719 | 0.10% | 2147 | 0.09% | 4700 | 0.05% |
| snoRNA | 1803 | 0.08% | 3204 | 0.03% | 1618 | 0.09% | 3531 | 0.03% | 2339 | 0.12% | 7135 | 0.07% | 2237 | 0.10% | 6620 | 0.07% |
| tRNA | 9187 | 0.43% | 324707 | 3.35% | 10844 | 0.59% | 805859 | 7.42% | 9780 | 0.50% | 1040917 | 10.12% | 8377 | 0.36% | 841886 | 8.58% |
| unannotation | 1082615 | 50.15% | 2422924 | 25.03% | 940557 | 51.11% | 2117483 | 19.50% | 978621 | 50.37% | 2316339 | 22.52% | 1166688 | 50.81% | 2559578 | 26.09% |
| Total | 2158953 | 100.00% | 9681350 | 100.00% | 1840407 | 100.00% | 10860761 | 100.00% | 1942714 | 100.00% | 10285363 | 100.00% | 2296357 | 100.00% | 9810707 | 100.00% |
Figure 2Differentially expressed miRNAs in response to –C, –N, and –S. The significantly differentially expressed miRNAs (greater than 1.5-fold relative change) are shown.
The bars marked by one ‘*’ indicate that the miRNAs are repressed by all three types of nutrient deficiencies (–C, –N, and –S). The bars marked by one ‘@’ indicate that the miRNAs are induced by one of the three types of nutrient deficiencies, but repressed by the other two. The bar shared by two or more miRNA members indicates that these miRNAs have the same read number.
Summary of miRNAs commonly responsive to −C, −N, and −S and the potential functions in nutrient deficiency.
| Family | Species | Expression | Target genes | Potential roles | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −C | −N | −S | ||||||
| miR398 | b,c | * | Down | Down | Down | Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (CSD; CSD1, At1g08830; CSD2, At2g28190); copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase (CCS1, At1g12520); Cytochrome oxidase c(At3g15640) | Copper starvation response; Scavenge reactive oxygen species | |
| miR397 | a,b | * | Down | Down | Down | Laccase copper protein (LAC2,LAC4, LAC17, At2g29130, At2g38080, At5g60020) | Copper starvation response; Copper homeostasis | |
| miR408 | * | Down | Down | Down | Laccase copper protein (LAC3, LAC12, LAC13, At2g30210, At5g05390, At5g07130) Copper protein plantacyanin (At2g02850) | Copper starvation response; Copper homeostasis | ||
| miR857 | * | Down | Down | Down | Laccase copper protein (LAC7, At3g09220) | Copper starvation response; Copper homeostasis | ||
| miR399 | a,b,c,d,e,f | * | Down | Down | Down | Ubiquitin conjugase E2 (UBC24/PHO2; At2g33770) | Pi uptake and translocation | |
| miR827 | * | Down | Down | Down | Ubiquitin E3 ligase with RING and SPX domains (NLA/BAH1; At1g02860) | Nutrient recycle; Pi uptake and translocation | ||
| miR2111 | a,b | * | Down | Down | Down | Kelch repeat-containing F-box protein (At3g27150) | Phosphate starvation response | |
| miR775 | * | Down | Down | Down | Galactosyltransferase family protein (At1g53290 ) | Transferase activity, transferring hexosyl groups | ||
| miR172 | a,b | * | Down | Down | Down | AP2 transcription factor (At5g60120, At4g36920, At2g28550, At2g28550, At5g67180) | Juvenile-to-adult transition | |
| miR167 | a,b,d | * | Down | Down | Down | Auxin response factor (ARF6, ARF8, At1g30330, At5g37020) | Root and pollen development; Stress responses | |
| miR841 | * | Down | Down | Down | Unknown | Unknown | ||
| miR160 | a,b,c | * | Up | Up | Up | Auxin response factor (ARF10, ARF16, ARF17, At2g283502, At4g300802, At1g778502) | Root growth and development; Stress response | |
| miR169 | b,c | @ | Up | Down | Down | NFYA transcription factors (At1g17590, At1g54160, At1g72830, At3g05690, At3g20910, At5g06510, At5g12840) | Nitrogen homeostasis | |
| miR837 | 3p | @ | Down | Up | Up | Unknown | Unknown | |
| miR826 | @ | Down | Up | Down | Alkenyl hydroxalkyl producing 2(AOP2, At4g03060) | Nitrogen starvation response; Glucosinolate synthesis | ||
| miR395 | a,b,c,d,e,f | @ | Down | Down | Up | ATP sulfurylase (APS1, APS3, APS4; At3g22890, At4g14680, At5g43780) Sulfate transporter(SULTR2;1; At5g10180) | Sulfur homeostasis; Sulfate uptake and translocation | |
‘*’ indicates that the miRNAs are similarly regulated by three types of nutrient deficiencies (–C, −N, and –S) whereas ‘@’ indicates that the miRNAs are differentially regulated.
Figure 3Expression of miRNAs and their targets in response to nutrient deficiencies.
RNA was isolated from 10-day-old seedlings. Relative expression was indicated by the log2 value. Student’s t test indicated that the values marked by one asterisk are significantly different from the corresponding full nutrient value (P < 0.01; n = 3).
Figure 4Phenotypes of transgenic plants under nutrient starvation conditions.
(A) Ten-day-old seedlings grown vertically. (B) The ratio of shoot/root mass of 10-day-old seedlings grown under full nutrient and nutrient-deficient conditions. The error bars represent the SD from triplicate samples with each sample containing 10–15 plants. Student’s t test indicated that the values marked by one asterisk are significantly different from the corresponding full nutrient value (P < 0.01; n = 3).