Literature DB >> 21153842

Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which technique, which surgeon, for which patient? A study of the implementation in a teaching hospital.

D Mutter1, C Callari, M Diana, B Dallemagne, J Leroy, J Marescaux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single port cholecystectomy is increasingly performed. This procedure can be challenging, and we lack factors predicting the operative difficulty. AIMS: To assess the role of surgeon experience and identify possible predictive factors of intraoperative difficulties. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one selected patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2008 and August 2010. Six surgeons were involved (3 seniors, 3 juniors). Anthropometrics of the patients, types of ports, exposure methods and intraoperative data were recorded. Pain was assessed with the visual analogic scale at postoperative day 1 (POD 1 VAS).
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with symptomatic gallstones and three with acute cholecystitis underwent single port cholecystectomy. The mean BMI, weight and height were 25.7 kg/m(2) (SD 4.45), 71.8 kg (SD 14.83) and 166 cm SD 0.07, respectively. Mean operative time was 68.4 min (SD 26.98). Anthropometrics had no influence on operative time. Senior surgeons performed more rapidly, but the difference was not significant. The overall mean POD 1 VAS was 2.26, (SD 1.81). The mean hospital stay was 2.22 days, (SD 0.9). No complications occurred. An additional exposure method was necessary in 19 procedures. This cluster presented a significantly higher operating time (81.5 min, SD 31.69 vs. 62.7, SD 22.74; p = 0.01) and POD 1 VAS (1.92 vs. 3; p = 0.031).
CONCLUSION: Single trocar cholecystectomy can be implemented safely in teaching hospitals. Anthropometrics are not predictive of operative difficulties. The need for additional exposure systems affects the operative time and pain negatively, reflecting greater technical difficulties. Research to optimize instruments may help to solve these problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21153842     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-010-0348-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  10 in total

Review 1.  Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pierre Allemann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy: The Timeline of Progress.

Authors:  Shahida Bibi; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Jasna Coralic; Mohamed Bayoumi; Joubin Khorsand; Daniel T Farkas; Leela M Prasad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Banujan Balachandran; Theadore A Hufford; Taha Mustafa; Kunal Kochar; Suela Sulo; Joubin Khorsand
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience.

Authors:  Giuseppe Spinoglio; Luca Matteo Lenti; Valeria Maglione; Francesco Saverio Lucido; Fabio Priora; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Federica Grosso; Raul Quarati
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Single port versus multiple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a comparative study.

Authors:  A Sharma; V Soni; M Baijal; R Khullar; K Najma; P K Chowbey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a plausible alternative to the traditional four-port laparoscopic approach?

Authors:  Juan Pablo Arroyo; Luis A Martín-Del-Campo; Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-05-09

7.  Can single incision laproscopic cholecystectomy replace the traditional four port laproscopic approach: a review.

Authors:  Muhammad Umer Ahmed; Azib Aftab; Haseeb Munaf Seriwala; Ali Mahmood Khan; Khurram Anis; Iqbal Ahmed; Shafiq Ur Rehman
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-07-15

8.  Detecting the Interdisciplinary Nature and Topic Hotspots of Robotics in Surgery: Social Network Analysis and Bibliometric Study.

Authors:  Lining Shen; Shimin Wang; Wei Dai; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Experiences of single incision cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Huseyin Yilmaz; Husnu Alptekin; Fahrettin Acar; Ilhan Ciftci; Ahmet Tekin; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Sun; Jia Lin Zhang; Cheng Shuo Zhang; Xiao Hang Li; Yue Shi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.