| Literature DB >> 26133789 |
Chenyao Fan1, Chao Chen1, Jia Wang1, Xinxin Fu1, Zhimin Ren1, Guodong Qian1, Zhiyu Wang1.
Abstract
The amorphous TiO2 derived from hydroxylation has become an effective approach for the enhancement of photocatalytic activity of TiO2 since a kind of special black TiO2 was prepared by engineering disordered layers on TiO2 nanocrystals via hydrogenation. In this contribution, we prepared totally amorphous TiO2 with various degrees of blackness by introducing hydroxyls via ultrasonic irradiation, through which can we remarkably enhance the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 with improved light harvesting and narrowed band gap.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26133789 PMCID: PMC4488957 DOI: 10.1038/srep11712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A photo comparing the appearance of original TiO2 and ultrasonic treated TiO2 for different hours.
Figure 2Ti 2p XPS spectra (a) and XRD patterns (b) of original TiO2 and ultrasonic treated TiO2 for different hours.
Figure 3O 1s XPS spectra of original TiO2 and amorphous hydroxylated TiO2 prepared through ultrasonication for different hours.
Some structural parameters of original TiO2 and amorphous hydroxylated TiO2 prepared through ultrasonication for different hours.
| Sample | TiOH/Ti-O | Eg[eV] | Surface area[m2g−1] | Pore volume[mlg−1] | Porosity[%]b) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | 3.37 | 166.43 | 0.109 | 24.8 | |
| 1.02 | 3.22 | 174.62 | 0.128 | 28.98 | |
| 1.08 | 3.2 | 195.37 | 0.168 | 38.28 | |
| 1.23 | 3.2 | 214.00 | 0.183 | 42.64 | |
| 1.28 | 3.18 | 238.11 | 0.228 | 53.03 | |
| 1.54 | 3.11 | 328.55 | 0.251 | 58.26 |
a)The ratio of Ti-OH/Ti-O was calculated from the peak areas in O 1 s XPS spectra; b) The value of porosity was calculated from the ratio of pore volume and sample volume.
Detail information and testing results of heating treatment.
| Sample | W1[g] | W2[g] | Value of “x” | TiOH/Ti-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5171 | 0.4723 | 0.422 | 0.73 | |
| 0.7077 | 0.6328 | 0.526 | 1.11 | |
| 0.7045 | 0.6283 | 0.539 | 1.17 | |
| 0.5684 | 0.5052 | 0.556 | 1.25 | |
| 0.3836 | 0.3399 | 0.571 | 1.33 | |
| 0.3698 | 0.3248 | 0.616 | 1.60 |
a)W1 represents the original sample weight before heating.
b)W2 represents the sample weight after heating at 800 °C for 3 h.
c)The value of “x” was calculated through n(TiO2)(W1-W2)/n(H2O)W2.
d)The ratio of Ti-OH/Ti-O equals to x/(1-x).
Figure 4(a) UV-Vis absorbance spectroscopy of original TiO2 and amorphous hydroxylated TiO2 prepared through ultrasonicstion for different hours. (b). VB XPS spectra of original TiO2 and amorphous hydroxylated TiO2 prepared through ultrasonicstion for different hours. The thin black lines indicate the locations of valance band maximum (VBM) of each sample. (c). The schematic illustrations of DOS of original TiO2 and amorphous hydroxylated TiO2 prepared through ultrasonicstion for different hours. The black and blue arrows indicate the band gaps before and after localized band bending respectively.
Figure 5Evaluation of solar-driven (a) and visible-light-driven (b) photocatalytic activity (AF decomposition) of original TiO2 and hydroxylated TiO2 prepared through ultrasonication for different hours.
Figure 6Kinetic plots based on Figure 5a and Figure 5b respectively.