| Literature DB >> 36133264 |
Suman Sekhar Sahoo1, Sriram Mansingh1, Pradeepta Babu1, Kulamani Parida1.
Abstract
The TiO2 semiconductor photocatalyst is in the limelight of sustainable energy research in recent years because of its beneficial properties. However, its wide band-gap and rapid exciton recombination rate makes it a lame horse, and reduces its photocatalytic efficiency. Recently, researchers have developed facile methods for lowering the band-gap, so that it captures a wide range of solar spectrum, but the efficiency is still way behind the target value. After the discovery of black titania (B-TiO2), the associated drawbacks of white TiO2 and its modified forms were addressed to a large extent because it not only absorbs photons in a broad spectral range (UV to IR region), but also modifies the structural and morphological features, along with the electronic properties of the material, significantly boosting the catalytic performance. Hence, B-TiO2 effectively converts solar energy into renewable chemical energy i.e. green fuel H2 that can ultimately satisfy the energy crisis and environmental pollution. However, the synthesis techniques involved are quite tedious and challenging. Hence, this review summarizes various preparation methods of B-TiO2 and the involved characterization techniques. It also discusses the different modification strategies adopted to improve the H2 evolution activity, and hopes that this review acts as a guiding tool for researchers working in this field. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 36133264 PMCID: PMC9419872 DOI: 10.1039/d1na00477h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Adv ISSN: 2516-0230
Scheme 1Different preparation techniques adopted for fabricating B-TiO2.
Fig. 1(a) UV-Vis DRS, (b and c) Raman, and (d–f) XPS spectra of H–TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 60. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 2(a) SEM image of the electrochemically anodized TiO2 nanotube arrays, (b) the digital image of the neat and hydrogenated samples annealed at different temperatures, and (c and d) Ti 2p and O 1s XPS spectra of the parent TiO2 and H–TiO2 nanowires. Reprinted with permission from ref. 62. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 3(a) EPR data and (b) NMR spectra of the TiO2 nanotube annealed in different atmospheric conditions (H2, Ar/H2 and high pressure H2). Reprinted with permission from ref. 66. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 4(a) FESEM image of the H–TiO2 nanofibers, (b) Raman spectra of the pristine and H–bicrystalline TiO2, and (c) TGA plot of the pure and H–TiO2 nanofibers. Reprinted with permission from ref. 67. Copyright 2015 Elsevier.
Fig. 5(a) EPR spectra of B-TiO2 treated at different temperatures and parent material, (b) optical absorption spectra of B-TiO2, (c) energy profile diagram of neat and reduced TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 68. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6(a) Raman spectra, and (b and c) Ti 2p and O 1s high resolution XPS spectra of the prepared materials. Reprinted with permission from ref. 72. Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 7(a) Schematic representations of the formation mechanism of TiO2@TiO2−, (b) EPR spectra, (c) C 1s XPS analysis of the white, black and yellow TiO2 after 60 s Ar+ etching. Reprinted with permission from ref. 73. Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Fig. 8(a) Absorbance spectra of the TiO2 reduced at different temperatures, (b) TEM image of reduced TiO2, (c and d) XPS spectra (Ti 2p and O 1s) of the parent and reduced TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 77. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 9(a) SEM image of NaBH4-reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays. (b) Energy profile diagram of CV and VB. (c) EPR spectra of the TiO2 nanotube arrays reduced at different temperatures. Reprinted with permission from ref. 81. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 10(a) Surface reaction mechanism, (b) Ti 2p XPS spectra of the parent and modified TiO2, (c) digital image of the reduced TiO2 samples synthesized by annealing at different temperatures. Reprinted with permission from ref. 83. Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Fig. 11(a) Schematic representations of the anodization process, along with the electrochemical reduction procedure for the formation of self-doped TiO2 nanotubes. (b) SEM image of the electrochemically reduced nanotubes. (c) XPS spectra of Ti 2p3/2. (d) Digital image of the samples before and after the anodization process. Reprinted with permission from ref. 85. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 12(a) Schematic representations of the following synthesis procedure. (b) FTIR spectra and (c) the density of states calculations of yellow and B-TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 87. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 13(a) Schematic representations of the surface disorders generated by the ultrasonication process, (b) VB XPS plot of the parent and TiO2 nanocrystals after ultrasonication, and (c) the energy profile diagram of the material for different time periods of ultrasonic treatment. Reprinted with permission from ref. 90. Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Fig. 14(a) Schematic representations of the procedure employed for the synthesis of mesoporous B-TiO2 nanocrystals, (b) FTIR spectra of white and black MPBT nanocrystals, and (c) TEM images of mesoporous B-TiO2 nanocrystals. Reprinted with permission from ref. 95. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 15(a) Schematic representations of the synthesis procedure of B-TiO2 nanotube arrays, and (b) lattice structure of the material with its energy bands. Reprinted with permission from ref. 97. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Scheme 2Schematic diagram shows various modification techniques for B-TiO2 to increase the hydrogen generation rate.
Fig. 16(a) Graphical representations of the hydrogen evolution rate by various Pt-doped TiO2 samples, (b) mechanism for the transfer of an electron from the bulk to the surface, (c) photocurrent response, and (d) Nyquist plot electrochemical impedance spectra. Reprinted with permission from ref. 98. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 17(a) Visible light-driven hydrogen generation rate of various doped TiO2, (b) photoconversion efficiency of various S-doped photocatalysts, and (c) stability data of the photocatalyst. Reprinted with permission from ref. 99. Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 18(a) Photocatalytic hydrogen production, (b) cyclic test of the photocatalyst towards hydrogen production, and (c) possible mechanism of the reaction taking place on the surface of the B–N co-doped TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 100. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Fig. 19(a) Schematic illustrations of the boron sites, (b) photocatalytic activity, and (c) reusability test graph of 10% boron doped TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 101. Copyright 2016 Nature Journal.
Fig. 20(a) The average rate of photocatalytic hydrogen production by different doped samples, (b) the stability of the material towards photocatalytic hydrogen generation, and (c) the proposed mechanism of the reaction occurring on the surface of the photocatalyst. Reprinted with permission from ref. 102. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Fig. 21(a) The rate of hydrogen production by various wt% Pd-loaded black TiO2, (b) the possible mechanism occurring on the surface, and (c) the band structure of the material, along with the charge transfer process in Pd co-catalyzed black TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 103. Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Fig. 22(a) Photocatalytic hydrogen generation rate by B-TiO2, Ni/B-TiO2-1, Ni/B-TiO2-2, Ni/B-TiO2-3, and (b) the reusability of the non-noble metal co-catalyzed B-TiO2. Reprinted with permission from ref. 105. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Fig. 23(a) Mechanism of hydrogen production by the composite TNTC10, (b) photocatalytic hydrogen generation rate by various samples, (c) reusability of the H–TiO2 composite, and (d) wavelength-dependent AQE of hydrogen evolution. Reprinted with permission from ref. 107. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Fig. 24(a) TEM image and (b) SEM image of the stable mesoporous B-TiO2 hollow spheres, (c) photocatalytic hydrogen production rate by the mesoporous hollow spheres, and (d) cycling check for the stability of the mesoporous B-TiO2 hollow sphere. Reprinted with permission from ref. 110. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Scheme 3The timeline of black TiO2 progression for the productive hydrogen generation reaction.
Various data obtained from the water-splitting reaction by using the photocatalyst (i.e., B-TiO2) towards the hydrogen generation reaction
| Sl no. | Sample notation | Conditions | Sacrificial reagent and co-catalyst | Irradiation source (wavelength) | Catalytic efficiency (%) | Rate of hydrogen generation | Durability | Reference no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B-TiO2 | 20 mg of black TiO2 + 1 : 1 water–methanol solution | Methanol as a sacrificial agent and 0.6 wt% of platinum as cocatalyst | Full spectrum solar light | Energy conservation efficiency = 24 | 0.1 ± 0.02 mmol h−1 g−1 | 22 days |
|
| 2 | Pt-doped TiO2− | 50 mg of Pt doped TiO2− | Methanol is used as a sacrificial agent | Four low-power 365 nm LEDs (3 W) | Quantum efficiency = 6.2% | 151 μmol m−2 h−1 | 0.5 h |
|
| 3 | Sulphur-doped TiO2− | 100 mg of sulphur-doped TiO2− | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | AM 1.5 simulated solar power system | Data not available | 0.258 mmol h−1 g−1 | 20 h |
|
| 4 | Pt co-catalyzed black TiO2− | 50 mg of Pd/TiO2− | Methanol is used as a sacrificial agent | Sankyo Denki, G8T5BLB ( | Photon energy conversion efficiency = 4.12 | 5200 μmol h−1 g−1 | Data not available |
|
| Pd co-catalyzed black TiO2− | 50 mg of Pd/TiO2− | Methanol is used as a sacrificial agent and Pd as cocatalyst | Sankyo Denki, G15T8E ( | Photon energy conversion efficiency = 2.31 | 9300 μmol h−1 g−1 | Data not available | ||
| 5 | Ni co-catalyzed black TiO2− | 0.2 wt% Ni/0.1 g of the photocatalyst was taken in a methanol water mixture containing 10 ml of methanol in 500 ml of water TiO2− | Methanol is used as a sacrificial agent and Pd as cocatalyst | 250 W high pressure mercury lamp | Data not available | 1127 μmol h−1 g−1 | 6 h |
|
| Co co-catalyzed black TiO2− | 0.1 wt% Co/TiO2− | Methanol was taken as a sacrificial agent and Co as co-catalyst | 250 W high pressure mercury lamp | Data not available | 1180 μmol h−1 g−1 | 6 h | ||
| Ni & Co co-catalyzed black TiO2− | Mixture of 0.2 wt% Ni/TiO2− | Methanol was taken as a sacrificial agent and a mixture of Ni and Co as co-catalyst | 250 W high pressure mercury lamp | Data not available | 1282 μmol h−1 g−1 | 6 h | ||
| 6 | Heterojunction of B-TiO2− | The photocatalyst with a mixture of water and methanol | Methanol was taken as a sacrificial agent and Ni behaves as the cocatalyst | Stimulated sunlight irradiation with wave length 365 nm | Quantum efficiency = 43 | 166.2 μmol h−1 g−1 | 15 h |
|
| Heterojunction of B–TiO2− | The photocatalyst with a mixture of water and methanol | Methanol was taken as a sacrificial agent and Ni behave as the cocatalyst | Stimulated sunlight irradiation with wave length 420 nm | Quantum efficiency = 12 | 166.2 μmol h−1 g−1 | 15 h | ||
| Heterojunction of B-TiO2− | The photocatalyst with a mixture of water and methanol | Methanol was taken as a sacrificial agent and Ni behaves as the cocatalyst | Stimulated sunlight irradiation with wave length 520 nm | Quantum efficiency = 6 | 166.2 μmol h−1 g−1 | 15 h | ||
| 7 | Composite of black TiO2− | 10 mg of the photocatalyst in a 100 ml mixture containing 80 ml water and 20 ml methanol | Methanol was taken as a sacrificial agent and 0.5 wt% H2PtCl6·6H2O as cocatalyst | Auto-light CEL-HXF300 Xe lamp (300 W) | Data not available | 186 μmol h−1 0.01 g−1 | Data not available |
|
| 8 | {111} facet exposed B-TiO2− | 100 mg of the photo catalyst in 120 ml of methanol water solution (25 ml methanol and 95 ml water) | Methanol is used as sacrificial agent and 1 wt% of Pt as cocatalyst | 300 W Xe lamp with a cut off edge at 400 nm | Turnover number = 1.47 | 18.1 μmol h−1 0.1 g−1 | 100 h |
|
| 9 | TiO2− | 100 mg of the photo catalyst loaded in 1 wt% of Pt placed in 100 ml methanol–water mixture in a ratio 1 : 4 | Methanol is used as sacrificial agent and 1 wt% of Pt as cocatalyst | 300 W Xe lamp with band pass filter of 365 nm | Quantum efficiency = 70 | 241 μmol h−1 0.1 g−1 | 18 h |
|
| TiO2− | 100 mg of the photo catalyst loaded in 1 wt% of Pt placed in 100 ml methanol–water mixture in a ratio 1 : 4 | Methanol is used as sacrificial agent and 1 wt% of Pt as cocatalyst | 300 W Xe lamp with band pass filter of 420 nm | Quantum efficiency = 2.3 | 241 μmol h−1 0.1 g−1 | 18 h | ||
| TiO2− | 100 mg of the photo catalyst loaded in 1 wt% of Pt placed in 100 ml methanol–water mixture in a ratio 1 : 4 | Methanol is used as sacrificial agent and 1 wt% of Pt as cocatalyst | 300 W Xe lamp with band pass filter of 520 nm | Quantum efficiency = 1.4 | 241 μmol h−1 0.1 g−1 | 18 h | ||
| 10 | Nitrogen doped TiO2− | 50 mg of N doped TiO2− | Methanol as sacrificial agent and MoS2 as cocatalyst | 300 W xenon-lamp equipped with a 420 nm cut-off filter | Data not available | 1.882 mmol h−1 g−1 | 25 h |
|
| 11 | Boron-doped TiO2− | 0.005 g of the 10% B-TiO2− | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | 300 W xenon lamp | Photocatalytic efficiency = 21% | 0.059 mmol h−1 g−1 | 42 h |
|
| 12 | Fluorine doped TiO2− | 0.20 g fluorine doped TiO2− | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | 300 W Xe lamp | Quantum yield = 46% with hydrogen energy conversion efficiency = 34% | Data not available | 12.5 h |
|
| 13 | AAr-TNT(B) | 5 mg (2 cm2) sample with 3 wt% Pt, 100 ml of methanol/H2O solution (1/5 methanol/H2O) | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | 300 W Xe arc lamp with a 400 nm cut-off filter | AQY = 13.4 ( | 4.705 μmol cm−2 h−1 | 25 h |
|
| 14 | TiO2-BT-Au 10s | Required amount of sample dispersed in 10 ml of 30% methanol/H2O solution | 10 ml methanol (30 vol%) sacrificial agent and Au as cocatalyst | 300 nm Xe lamp fitted with 420 nm band-pass filter, intensity = 100 MW cm−2 | AQY of 4.13% at 420 nm | 34.37 μmol cm−2 | 18 h |
|
| 15 | Pt-loaded mesoporous TiO2-B nanobelts | 70 mg of 0.5 wt% Pt-loaded mesoporous TiO2-B nanobelts were dispersed in the mixed solution (220 ml of H2O and 50 ml of CH3OH) | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | AM 1.5 light irradiation ( | Data not available | 656.10 μmol h−1 | Data not available |
|
| 16 | Ordered mesoporous black TiO2 (OMBT) | 100 mg catalyst loaded with 1 wt% Pt suspended in a mixture of 80 ml H2O and 20 ml CH3OH | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | AM 1.5 with a power density of 100 mW cm−2 | AQY of 62.3% at 365 nm | 136.2 μmol h−1 | 30 h |
|
| 17 | Mesoporous Pt/NiS/black TiO2 hollow nanotubes (P-NBTNs) | 50 mg catalyst loaded with 0.11 wt% Pt suspended in a mixture of 80 ml H2O and 20 ml CH3OH | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | AM 1.5 solar simulator with an AM 1.5G filter | Data not available | 4.70 mmol h−1 g−1 | 24 h |
|
| 18 | 10LBT/CdS | Sample 20 mg, 50 ml of sacrificial agent aqueous solution, | Na2S and Na2SO3 as sacrificial agent without any cocatalyst | 300 W xenon lamp + | Data not available | 9.9 mmol h−1 g−1 | 16 h |
|
| 19 | Hydrogenated/nitrogen-doped black TiO2 nanoplates (NHTA) | 100 mg catalyst loaded with 0.5 wt% Pt suspended in a mixture of 80 ml H2O and 20 ml CH3OH | Methanol as sacrificial agent and Pt as cocatalyst | 300 xenon lamp (300 W) equipped with optical cut-off filters to realize AM 1.5 | QE = 92% at 365 nm | 1500 μmol g−1 h−1 | 15 h |
|
| 20 | Defective black TiO2− | 30 mg sample decorated with 0.03 wt% Rh were dispersed in 30 ml 10 vol% aqueous methanol solution | Methanol as a sacrificial agent and Rh as cocatalyst | A 500 W mid-pressure Hg lamp with 420 nm optical cut-off filters | Data not available | 0.58 μmol g−1 h−1 | Data not available |
|
| 21 | B-TiO2/g-C3N4 nano-heterojunctions | 50 mg sample added to 10 ml triethanolamine and 90 ml DI water | Triethanolamine as sacrificial agent without any cocatalyst | 300 W Xe lamp was used as the simulating sunlight source with intensity of 100 mW cm−2 | Data not available | 808.97 μmol g−1 h−1 | 30 h |
|