Literature DB >> 26133592

Development and evaluation of aperture-based complexity metrics using film and EPID measurements of static MLC openings.

Julia Götstedt1, Anna Karlsson Hauer2, Anna Bäck2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complexity metrics have been suggested as a complement to measurement-based quality assurance for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). However, these metrics have not yet been sufficiently validated. This study develops and evaluates new aperture-based complexity metrics in the context of static multileaf collimator (MLC) openings and compares them to previously published metrics.
METHODS: This study develops the converted aperture metric and the edge area metric. The converted aperture metric is based on small and irregular parts within the MLC opening that are quantified as measured distances between MLC leaves. The edge area metric is based on the relative size of the region around the edges defined by the MLC. Another metric suggested in this study is the circumference/area ratio. Earlier defined aperture-based complexity metrics-the modulation complexity score, the edge metric, the ratio monitor units (MU)/Gy, the aperture area, and the aperture irregularity-are compared to the newly proposed metrics. A set of small and irregular static MLC openings are created which simulate individual IMRT/VMAT control points of various complexities. These are measured with both an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and EBT3 film. The differences between calculated and measured dose distributions are evaluated using a pixel-by-pixel comparison with two global dose difference criteria of 3% and 5%. The extent of the dose differences, expressed in terms of pass rate, is used as a measure of the complexity of the MLC openings and used for the evaluation of the metrics compared in this study. The different complexity scores are calculated for each created static MLC opening. The correlation between the calculated complexity scores and the extent of the dose differences (pass rate) are analyzed in scatter plots and using Pearson's r-values.
RESULTS: The complexity scores calculated by the edge area metric, converted aperture metric, circumference/area ratio, edge metric, and MU/Gy ratio show good linear correlation to the complexity of the MLC openings, expressed as the 5% dose difference pass rate, with Pearson's r-values of -0.94, -0.88, -0.84, -0.89, and -0.82, respectively. The overall trends for the 3% and 5% dose difference evaluations are similar.
CONCLUSIONS: New complexity metrics are developed. The calculated scores correlate to the complexity of the created static MLC openings. The complexity of the MLC opening is dependent on the penumbra region relative to the area of the opening. The aperture-based complexity metrics that combined either the distances between the MLC leaves or the MLC opening circumference with the aperture area show the best correlation with the complexity of the static MLC openings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133592     DOI: 10.1118/1.4921733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

Review 1.  Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.

Authors:  Sophie Chiavassa; Igor Bessieres; Magali Edouard; Michel Mathot; Alexandra Moignier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance.

Authors:  Mallory C Glenn; Victor Hernandez; Jordi Saez; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Julianne M Pollard-Larkin; Shouhao Zhou; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Optimization of collimator angles in dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampus and inner ear sparing.

Authors:  Wuji Sun; Kunzhi Chen; Yu Li; Wenming Xia; Lihua Dong; Yinghua Shi; Chao Ge; Xu Yang; Libo Wang; Huidong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparison of complexity metrics for multi-institutional evaluations of treatment plans in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Victor Hernandez; Jordi Saez; Marlies Pasler; Diego Jurado-Bruggeman; Nuria Jornet
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-22

5.  Edge area metric complexity scoring of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.

Authors:  Julia Götstedt; Anna Bäck
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-06

6.  Evaluation of Plan Robustness Using Hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Arc Modulation Radiotherapy (VMAT) for Left-Sided Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Ding; Qi Zeng; Kailian Kang; Meiling Xu; Xiaoyong Xiang; Chenbin Liu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  Predicting deliverability of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis.

Authors:  Kelly C Younge; Don Roberts; Lindsay A Janes; Carlos Anderson; Jean M Moran; Martha M Matuszak
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.