Literature DB >> 34561504

Optimization of collimator angles in dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampus and inner ear sparing.

Wuji Sun1, Kunzhi Chen1, Yu Li1, Wenming Xia1, Lihua Dong1,2,3, Yinghua Shi1, Chao Ge1, Xu Yang1, Libo Wang1, Huidong Wang4.   

Abstract

To optimize the collimator angles in dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampus and inner ear sparing (HIS-WBRT). Two sets of dual-arc VMAT plans were generated for 13 small-cell lung cancer patients: (1) The collimator angles of arcs 1 and 2 (θ1/θ2) were 350°/10°, 350°/30°, 350°/45°, 350°/60°, and 350°/80°, i.e., the intersection angle of θ1 and θ2 (Δθ) increased. (2) θ1/θ2 were 280°/10°, 300°/30°, 315°/45°, 330°/60°, and 350°/80°, i.e., Δθ = 90°. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor units (MUs), and dosimetric parameters of organs-at-risk were analyzed. Quality assurance for Δθ = 90° plans was performed. With Δθ increasing towards 90°, a significant improvement was observed for most parameters. In 350°/80° plans compared with 350°/10° ones, CI and HI were improved by 1.1% and 25.2%, respectively; MUs were reduced by 16.2%; minimum, maximum, and mean doses (D100%, Dmax, and Dmean, respectively) to the hippocampus were reduced by 5.5%, 6.3%, and 5.4%, respectively; Dmean to the inner ear and eye were reduced by 0.7% and 5.1%, respectively. With Δθ kept at 90°, the plan quality was not significantly affected by θ1/θ2 combinations. The gamma-index passing rates in 280°/10° and 350°/80° plans were relatively lower compared with the other Δθ = 90° plans. Δθ showed a significant effect on dual-arc VMAT plans for HIS-WBRT. With Δθ approaching 90°, the plan quality exhibited a nearly continuous improvement, whereas with Δθ = 90°, the effect of θ1/θ2 combination was insignificant.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34561504      PMCID: PMC8463591          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98530-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  44 in total

1.  Optimization of collimator trajectory in volumetric modulated arc therapy: development and evaluation for paraspinal SBRT.

Authors:  Pengpeng Zhang; Laura Happersett; Yingli Yang; Yoshiya Yamada; Gig Mageras; Margie Hunt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Letter to the Editor on 'Single-Arc IMRT?'.

Authors:  Karl Otto
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Beam’s-eye-view dosimetrics (BEVD) guided rotational station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT) planning based on reweighted total-variation minimization.

Authors:  Hojin Kim; Ruijiang Li; Rena Lee; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Radiation dose constraints for organs at risk in neuro-oncology; the European Particle Therapy Network consensus.

Authors:  Maarten Lambrecht; Daniëlle B P Eekers; Claire Alapetite; Neil G Burnet; Valentin Calugaru; Ida E M Coremans; Piero Fossati; Morten Høyer; Johannes A Langendijk; Alejandra Méndez Romero; Frank Paulsen; Ana Perpar; Laurette Renard; Dirk de Ruysscher; Beate Timmermann; Pavel Vitek; Damien C Weber; Hiske L van der Weide; Gillian A Whitfield; Ruud Wiggenraad; Erik Roelofs; Petra Witt Nyström; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a "how-to" technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Vinai Gondi; Ranjini Tolakanahalli; Minesh P Mehta; Dinesh Tewatia; Howard Rowley; John S Kuo; Deepak Khuntia; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Effect of MLC leaf position, collimator rotation angle, and gantry rotation angle errors on intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sen Bai; Guangjun Li; Maojie Wang; Qinfeng Jiang; Yingjie Zhang; Yuquan Wei
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ben Slotman; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Gijs Kramer; Elaine Rankin; Michael Snee; Matthew Hatton; Pieter Postmus; Laurence Collette; Elena Musat; Suresh Senan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  On the selection of gantry and collimator angles for isocenter localization using Winston-Lutz tests.

Authors:  Weiliang Du; Jennifer L Johnson; Wei Jiang; Rajat J Kudchadker
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Variations in dosimetric distribution and plan complexity with collimator angles in hypofractionated volumetric arc radiotherapy for treating prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Li; Sheng-Fang Huang; Chih-Chieh Chang; Jang-Chun Lin; Jo-Ting Tsai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.