| Literature DB >> 26133176 |
Aleksandar Slavchev1, Zoltan Kovacs2, Haruki Koshiba3, Airi Nagai3, György Bázár4, Albert Krastanov5, Yousuke Kubota3, Roumiana Tsenkova3.
Abstract
Development of efficient screening method coupled with cell functionality evaluation is highly needed in contemporary microbiology. The presented novel concept and fast non-destructive method brings in to play the water spectral pattern of the solution as a molecular fingerprint of the cell culture system. To elucidate the concept, NIR spectroscopy with Aquaphotomics were applied to monitor the growth of sixteen Lactobacillus bulgaricus one Lactobacillus pentosus and one Lactobacillus gasseri bacteria strains. Their growth rate, maximal optical density, low pH and bile tolerances were measured and further used as a reference data for analysis of the simultaneously acquired spectral data. The acquired spectral data in the region of 1100-1850nm was subjected to various multivariate data analyses - PCA, OPLS-DA, PLSR. The results showed high accuracy of bacteria strains classification according to their probiotic strength. Most informative spectral fingerprints covered the first overtone of water, emphasizing the relation of water molecular system to cell functionality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26133176 PMCID: PMC4489812 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Growth rates, maximal optical densities, bile’s MICs and yields of biomass after low pH stress in presence of pepsin of the strains.
| Strain’s group | Strains | Maximal growth rate (μmax) in MRS broth, h-1 | Maximal optical density (λ = 665nm) in MRS broth | MIC of Bile, mg/ml | Yield of biomass after 3 h stay at pH 1.80 and 9000 U/ml pepsin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic strains | S10 | 0.115±0.012 | 2.950±0.075 | 2.500 | 0.126±0.014 |
| S11 | 0.118±0.013 | 2.950±0.066 | 2.500 | 0.100±0.014 | |
| S20 | 0.304±0.011 | 3.030±0.063 | 2.500 | 0.114±0.011 | |
| S22 | 0.106±0.012 | 2.677±0.092 | 2.500 | 0.117±0.016 | |
| S06 | 0.301±0.012 | 2.960±0.075 | 1.250 | 0.080±0.010 | |
| Moderate strains | S01 | 0.121±0.011 | 1.692±0.058 | 0.625 | 0.038±0.010 |
| S07 | 0.075±0.012 | 1.919±0.068 | 0.625 | 0.049±0.013 | |
| S28 | 0.106±0.024 | 2.770±0.087 | 0.313 | 0.025±0.006 | |
| S09 | 0.118±0.017 | 2.880±0.081 | 0.156 | 0.029±0.005 | |
| Y12 | 0.150±0.027 | 2.023±0.074 | 0.625 | 0.041±0.006 | |
| Non-probiotic strains | S02 | 0.070±0.011 | 1.521±0.035 | 0.156 | 0.006±0.001 |
| S03 | 0.060±0.009 | 1.343±0.039 | 0.313 | 0.005±0.002 | |
| S04 | 0.060±0.012 | 0.841±0.046 | 0.156 | 0.007±0.002 | |
| S29 | 0.060±0.010 | 1.440±0.046 | 0.625 | 0.005±0.002 | |
| S30 | 0.050±0.011 | 1.360±0.065 | 0.625 | 0.006±0.002 | |
| Moderate | S08 | 0.080±0.010 | 2.940±0.093 | 0.625 | 0.049±0.007 |
| Probiotic | SR | 0.070±0.012 | 1.676±0.046 | 1.250 | 0.036±0.004 |
| Probiotic | SS | 0.220±0.024 | 2.963±0.085 | 2.250 | 0.107±0.010 |
*—Standard deviations calculated based on three parallel samples scanned three consecutive times.
Fig 1a) Truncated (1100-1850nm) raw spectra (n = 4500) of the analyzed 15 Lactobacillus strains acquired between 40 min and 20 h of the cultivation time; b) Growing dynamics of L. bulgaricus S6 determined at λ = 665 nm; c) Calculated ratio between the distances of group centers and standard deviations (SD) of probiotic, moderate and non-probiotic groups in the plain of PC2 and PC3 of MW-PCA calculated on the truncated (1100-1850nm) NIR data in the function of the cultivation time.
Fig 2a) PCA Bi-plot calculated on the reference data (strains growth rates, maximal optical densities, bile MIC and the yield of biomass after three hours stay at pH 1.80 in presence of pepsin (9000 U/ml), reference data in Table 1); b) MW-PCA analyses using the 1100–1850 nm wavelength interval—Score plot calculated on spectral data (n = 150) at the cultivation time of 11.4–12 h.
Probiotic (red symbols), moderate (green symbols) and non-probiotic (blue symbols) groups; c) loadings of PC2 (blue line) and PC3 (black line) of MW-PCA model highlighting the bands.
Fig 3OPLS-DA model built on the spectral data of the 15 strains in the monitoring time between 11.4–12 h (n = 150) using the 1100–1850 nm wavelength interval to classify the probiotic, moderate and non-probiotic groups a) score plot and b) loadings plots.
Fig 4PLSR models on spectral data obtained between 11.4–12 h (n = 150) of the cultivation process, wavelength interval 1100–1850 nm a) Quantified MICs vs. NIR-predicted MICs of bile tolerance of the Lactobacillus strains.
Calibration (blue line and points), “one strain out” cross-validation model (red line and points) and strains not included in the modeling dataset (green dots); b) Quantified optical densities at 665 nm vs. NIR-predicted optical densities for strains cultivated in MRS after 3 h treatment at low pH and pepsin, c) PLS regression vectors, indicating the bands of biggest importance for the discrimination.
Fig 5Aquagram on the spectra of culture media of groups of probiotic, moderate and non-probiotic strains.
Averaged values of normalized absorbance values of the water matrix coordinates for every group are plotted on each axis. Results were calculated on spectral data obtained between 11.4–12 h.
Measured wavelength and calculated wavenumbers of the bands found with PCA, SIMCA, OPLS-DA and PLSR methods and their assignment based on the corresponding references.
| Measured wave-length (nm) | Calculated wave-number (cm−1) | Calculated fundamental wavenumber (cm−1) | Assignment | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1155 | - | Combination overtone of free water (S0) | - | |
| 1365 | 7326 | 7326/2 = 3663 | OH, 1st overtone, aqueous proton [H+·(H2O)2]—H2O asymmetric stretch | [ |
| OH, 1st overtone, Dangling-OH (non-hydrogen-bonded | [ | |||
| OH, 1st overtone, H2O v1 | [ | |||
| OH, 1st overtone, H15O7+ | [ | |||
| 1386 | 7215 | 7215/2 = 3607.5 | OH, 1st overtone, Superoxide Tetrahydrate O2-.(H2O)4 | [ |
| OH, 1st overtone, H+(H2O)10 | [ | |||
| C–H stretching, sucrose | [ | |||
| OH, 1st overtone, OH- stretching mode | [ | |||
| 1408 | 7100 | 7100/2 = 3550 | OH, 1st overtone, H-bonded OH stretch | [ |
| O–H, 1st overtone, glucose bonds | [ | |||
| OH, 1st overtone, OH stretching in alcohols | [ | |||
| OH, 1st overtone, hydrogen-bonded dimers | [ | |||
| 1450 | 6895 | 6895/2 = 3447.5 | OH, 1st overtone, deionized water | [ |
| OH, 1st overtone, O-H stretch | [ | |||
| combination of antisymmetric and symmetric stretching modes of water | [ | |||
| 1485 | 6735 | 6735/2 = 3367.5 | OH, 1st overtone, H17O8+ | [ |
| OH, 1st overtone, H15O7+ H-bonded OH stretch | [ | |||
| NH, 1st overtone, amid | [ | |||
| NH/OH, 1st overtone, N–H/O–H stretching | [ | |||
| 1492 | 6700 | 6700/2 = 3350 | OH, 1st overtone, hydrogen-bonded (S4) | [ |
| OH, 1st overtone, H15O7+ | [ | |||
| OH, 1st overtone, strongly H-bonded | [ | |||
| NH, 1st overtone, N–H stretching | [ | |||
| NH, 1st overtone, NH2's asymmetric stretch | [ | |||
| 1698 | 5890 | 5890/2 = 2945 | OH 1st overtone, Superoxide Tetrahydrate O2-.(H2O)4 | [ |
| C−H vibration | [ | |||
| CH/CH2 combination band | [ | |||
| H–O–H/O–H bending and translation/rotation combinations | [ | |||
| 1819 | 5500 | 5500/2 = 2750 | 1st overtone IHB stretch (OH-(H2O)3) | [ |
| combinationν(C−H) + ν(O−D)free | [ |