Literature DB >> 18389318

Cytokine responses following laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty in children.

Longxin Wang1, Weijun Qin, Feng Tian, Geng Zhang, Jianglin Yuan, He Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the cytokine response in children following laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) or open pyeloplasty (OP). A series of cytokines were measured postoperatively, including interkin1-beta (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
METHODS: A total of 31 patients, with an average age of 9.1 +/- 3.0 years (range 2.5-14 years) were studied. Fourteen patients underwent LP and 17 underwent OP. Blood serum concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-alpha, and CRP were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before surgery as well as 4, 24, and 48 h following the operation. In addition, the procedure duration, hospital stay, incidence of wound infection, and the recurrence rate of stenosis in both groups were compared.
RESULTS: Serum IL-6 and CRP concentrations were significantly elevated in both groups at 4, 24, and 48 h relative to preoperative levels. However, the rise in IL-6 and CRP in OP group was significantly more robust than in LP group. No significant changes were observed in serum levels of IL-1beta, IL-8, IL-10, or TNF-alpha in either group. The procedure duration was significantly longer for LP (193.6 +/- 74.7 min, range 120-360 min) versus OP (120.1 +/- 27.5 min, range 90-165 min, p < 0.05), but the hospital stay following LP was shorter (LP group: 5.3 +/- 1.1 days versus OP group: 9.3 +/- 2.1 days, p < 0.05). No severe complications were noted in either group, however, one child experienced wound infection following OP procedure. An incident of recurrent stenosis following the operation occurred in both groups. There was no postoperative morbidity or severe implications at 12 month follow-up in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both OP and LP are safe and effective procedures for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the pediatric population. However, the shorter hospital stay and decreased cytokine response following LP indicates potential benefits over traditional invasive procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389318     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9859-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  A prospective randomized study of the systemic immune response after laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  C Sietses; M J Wiezer; Q A Eijsbouts; R H Beelen; P A van Leeuwen; B M von Blomberg; S Meijer; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Cell response to surgery.

Authors:  Niamh Ni Choileain; H Paul Redmond
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11

3.  Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  H L Tan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Inflammatory responses after laparoscopic uterine myomectomy compared to open surgery in current clinical practice.

Authors:  Zdenek Holub; Antonin Jabor; Lev Kliment; Ludek Sprongl
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  A comparison of serum interleukin-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy.

Authors:  M Schietroma; F Carlei; L Franchi; C Mazzotta; A Sozio; N J Lygidakis; G Amicucci
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

6.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  C G Eden; D Cahill; J D Allen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Systemic inflammatory responses during laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a randomised prospective study.

Authors:  P Jess; K Schultz; K Bendtzen; O H Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-07

Review 8.  Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation?

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; F A Moore; V M Peterson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience in 15 cases.

Authors:  M R Ben Slama; L Salomon; A Hoznek; A Cicco; F Saint; W Alame; P Antiphon; D K Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Systemic immune response after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Y-J Boo; W-B Kim; J Kim; T-J Song; S-Y Choi; Y-C Kim; S-O Suh
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.713

View more
  2 in total

1.  An updated meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

Authors:  Yidong Huang; Yang Wu; Wei Shan; Li Zeng; Lugang Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database.

Authors:  Julian Hanske; Alejandro Sanchez; Marianne Schmid; Christian P Meyer; Firas Abdollah; Florian Roghmann; Adam S Feldman; Adam S Kibel; Jesse D Sammon; Joachim Noldus; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jairam R Eswara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.