Simon G F Abram1, Fiona Nicol2, Simon J Spencer2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK. simon.abram@doctors.org.uk. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite bilateral knee replacement being frequently performed, little data is available to inform on the relative outcomes of each knee for individual patients. The purpose of this study was to compare these outcomes in a series of bilateral total knee replacements (TKRs) performed either simultaneously or at a staged interval. METHODS: We compared outcomes measured by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS; /48) in a series of 656 bilateral TKRs (328 patients). One hundred and fifty-six TKRs were simultaneous and 500 TKRs staged. RESULTS: Of the staged patients, in 164 (65.6 %) the post-operative OKS in their second TKR matched the first, it was worse in 57 (22.8 %) and better in 29 (11.6 %). The trend was towards a worse OKS in the second staged TKR (p = 0.003). Mean improvement was similar in simultaneous cases to the first staged TKR (24.3 vs. 24.0; p = 0.883) but significantly less in second staged TKRs (20.2; p < 0.001) due to higher pre-operative scores. CONCLUSIONS: Individual patients attained a comparable post-operative score in both their knees, independent of age, pre-operative function and the duration of any staging interval.
PURPOSE: Despite bilateral knee replacement being frequently performed, little data is available to inform on the relative outcomes of each knee for individual patients. The purpose of this study was to compare these outcomes in a series of bilateral total knee replacements (TKRs) performed either simultaneously or at a staged interval. METHODS: We compared outcomes measured by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS; /48) in a series of 656 bilateral TKRs (328 patients). One hundred and fifty-six TKRs were simultaneous and 500 TKRs staged. RESULTS: Of the staged patients, in 164 (65.6 %) the post-operative OKS in their second TKR matched the first, it was worse in 57 (22.8 %) and better in 29 (11.6 %). The trend was towards a worse OKS in the second staged TKR (p = 0.003). Mean improvement was similar in simultaneous cases to the first staged TKR (24.3 vs. 24.0; p = 0.883) but significantly less in second staged TKRs (20.2; p < 0.001) due to higher pre-operative scores. CONCLUSIONS: Individual patients attained a comparable post-operative score in both their knees, independent of age, pre-operative function and the duration of any staging interval.
Authors: Lazaros A Poultsides; Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Stephen Lyman; Gina B Aharonoff; Carol A Mancuso; Thomas P Sculco Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: P R Fortin; A E Clarke; L Joseph; M H Liang; M Tanzer; D Ferland; C Phillips; A J Partridge; P Bélisle; A H Fossel; N Mahomed; C B Sledge; J N Katz Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1999-08
Authors: Louise Murphy; Todd A Schwartz; Charles G Helmick; Jordan B Renner; Gail Tudor; Gary Koch; Anca Dragomir; William D Kalsbeek; Gheorghe Luta; Joanne M Jordan Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-09-15
Authors: Stavros G Memtsoudis; Melanie C Besculides; Shane Reid; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Alejandro González Della Valle Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Mohammad Mahdi Sarzaeem; Farzad Amoozadeh Omrani; Mohammad Mahdi Omidian; Mohammad Ali Sahebalzamani; Ehsan Maniei Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2021-11