Literature DB >> 26123533

Within-strain variation in behavior differs consistently between common inbred strains of mice.

Maarten Loos1, Bastijn Koopmans, Emmeke Aarts, Gregoire Maroteaux, Sophie van der Sluis, Matthijs Verhage, August B Smit.   

Abstract

Genetic and environmental factors interact throughout life and give rise to individual differences, i.e., individuality. The diversifying effect of environmental factors is counteracted by genetic mechanisms to yield persistence of specific features (robustness). Here, we compared robustness between cohorts of isogenic mice of eight different commonly used strains by analyzing to what extent environmental variation contributed to individuality in each of the eight genotypes, using a previously published dataset. Behavior was assessed in the home-cage, providing control over environmental factors, to reveal within-strain variability in numerous spontaneous behaviors. Indeed, despite standardization and in line with previous studies, substantial variability among mice of the same inbred strain was observed. Strikingly, across a multidimensional set of 115 behavioral parameters, several strains consistently ranked high in within-strain variability (DBA/2J, 129S1/Sv A/J and NOD/LtJ), whereas other strains ranked low (C57BL/6J and BALB/c). Strain rankings of within-strain variability in behavior were confirmed in an independent, previously published behavioral dataset using conventional behavioral tests administered to different mice from the same breeding colonies. Together, these show that genetically inbred mouse strains consistently differ in phenotypic robustness against environmental variation, suggesting that genetic factors contribute to variation in robustness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123533     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-015-9578-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  27 in total

1.  Tuning in to noise: epigenetics and intangible variation.

Authors:  Nadia C Whitelaw; Suyinn Chong; Emma Whitelaw
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Behavioral idiosyncrasy reveals genetic control of phenotypic variability.

Authors:  Julien F Ayroles; Sean M Buchanan; Chelsea O'Leary; Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria; Jennifer K Grenier; Andrew G Clark; Daniel L Hartl; Benjamin L de Bivort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Activity and impulsive action are controlled by different genetic and environmental factors.

Authors:  M Loos; S van der Sluis; Z Bochdanovits; I J van Zutphen; T Pattij; O Stiedl; A B Smit; S Spijker
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 4.  The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era.

Authors:  Jenny van Dongen; P Eline Slagboom; Harmen H M Draisma; Nicholas G Martin; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  A third source of developmental differences.

Authors:  P C Molenaar; D I Boomsma; C V Dolan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 6.  The individuality of mice.

Authors:  R Lathe
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Lessons from model organisms: phenotypic robustness and missing heritability in complex disease.

Authors:  Christine Queitsch; Keisha D Carlson; Santhosh Girirajan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Reduced levels of two modifiers of epigenetic gene silencing, Dnmt3a and Trim28, cause increased phenotypic noise.

Authors:  Nadia C Whitelaw; Suyinn Chong; Daniel K Morgan; Colm Nestor; Timothy J Bruxner; Alyson Ashe; Eleanore Lambley; Richard Meehan; Emma Whitelaw
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Sheltering behavior and locomotor activity in 11 genetically diverse common inbred mouse strains using home-cage monitoring.

Authors:  Maarten Loos; Bastijn Koopmans; Emmeke Aarts; Gregoire Maroteaux; Sophie van der Sluis; Matthijs Verhage; August B Smit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The quantitative genetics of phenotypic robustness.

Authors:  Hunter B Fraser; Eric E Schadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Naomi S Altman; Anders Forsman; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jessica Gurevitch; Ivana Jaric; Natasha A Karp; Martien J Kas; Holger Schielzeth; Tom Van de Casteele; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  The Life of Behavior.

Authors:  Alex Gomez-Marin; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  A murine model of peripheral irradiation-induced fatigue.

Authors:  Michael Renner; Rebekah Feng; Danielle Springer; Mei-Kuang Chen; Andre Ntamack; Alexandra Espina; Leorey N Saligan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Primary cilia safeguard cortical neurons in neonatal mouse forebrain from environmental stress-induced dendritic degeneration.

Authors:  Seiji Ishii; Toru Sasaki; Shahid Mohammad; Hye Hwang; Edwin Tomy; Fahad Somaa; Nobuyuki Ishibashi; Hideyuki Okano; Pasko Rakic; Kazue Hashimoto-Torii; Masaaki Torii
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dissociation of impulsive traits by subthalamic metabotropic glutamate receptor 4.

Authors:  Lukasz Piszczek; Andreea Constantinescu; Dominic Kargl; Jelena Lazovic; Anton Pekcec; Janet R Nicholson; Wulf Haubensak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Interfering With Contextual Fear Memories by Post-reactivation Administration of Propranolol in Mice: A Series of Null Findings.

Authors:  Wouter R Cox; Leonidas Faliagkas; Amber Besseling; Rolinka J van der Loo; Sabine Spijker; Merel Kindt; Priyanka Rao-Ruiz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Metallothionein 1 Overexpression Does Not Protect Against Mitochondrial Disease Pathology in Ndufs4 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Hayley Christy Miller; Roan Louw; Michelle Mereis; Gerda Venter; John-Drew Boshoff; Liesel Mienie; Mari van Reenen; Marianne Venter; Jeremie Zander Lindeque; Adán Domínguez-Martínez; Albert Quintana; Francois Hendrikus van der Westhuizen
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Introducing Clicker Training as a Cognitive Enrichment for Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Charlotte Leidinger; Felix Herrmann; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Nadine Baumgart; Jan Baumgart
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Simultaneous assessment of cognitive function, circadian rhythm, and spontaneous activity in aging mice.

Authors:  Sreemathi Logan; Daniel Owen; Sixia Chen; Wei-Jen Chen; Zoltan Ungvari; Julie Farley; Anna Csiszar; Amanda Sharpe; Maarten Loos; Bastijn Koopmans; Arlan Richardson; William E Sonntag
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 7.713

10.  Laboratory mouse housing conditions can be improved using common environmental enrichment without compromising data.

Authors:  Viola André; Christine Gau; Angelika Scheideler; Juan A Aguilar-Pimentel; Oana V Amarie; Lore Becker; Lillian Garrett; Wolfgang Hans; Sabine M Hölter; Dirk Janik; Kristin Moreth; Frauke Neff; Manuela Östereicher; Ildiko Racz; Birgit Rathkolb; Jan Rozman; Raffi Bekeredjian; Jochen Graw; Martin Klingenspor; Thomas Klopstock; Markus Ollert; Carsten Schmidt-Weber; Eckhard Wolf; Wolfgang Wurst; Valérie Gailus-Durner; Markus Brielmeier; Helmut Fuchs; Martin Hrabé de Angelis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.