Literature DB >> 26121989

Associations Between Residential Proximity to Power Plants and Adverse Birth Outcomes.

Sandie Ha, Hui Hu, Jeffrey Roth, Haidong Kan, Xiaohui Xu.   

Abstract

Few studies have assessed the associations between residential proximity to power plants and adverse birth outcomes including preterm delivery (PTD), very preterm delivery (VPTD), and term low birth weight (LBW). We geocoded 423,719 singleton Florida births born from 2004 to 2005 and all active power plants and determined residential proximity to the nearest power plant for each birth. Prenatal exposure to particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter for women living near different types of power plants was also determined by using National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network data. Logistic regression models were used to test the hypothesized associations. Women who lived closer to coal and solid waste power plants were exposed to higher levels of particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter compared with other types. We observed a 1.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 2.3) increased odds for PTD, 2.2% (95% CI: 1.0, 3.4) for VPTD, and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.2, 2.0) for term LBW for each 5 km closer to any power plant. When stratifying by different fuel type, we found that only solid waste had an association with term LBW, whereas oil, gas, and solid waste all had an association with PTD and VPTD. Results were consistent when exposure was categorized by number of power plants. Our study found evidence of increasing odds of adverse birth outcomes among infants born to pregnant women living closer to power plants. More research is warranted to better understand the causal relationship.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth outcomes; environment; low birth weight; pollution; power plants; preterm delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26121989      PMCID: PMC4517698          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  33 in total

1.  Ambient air pollution and hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.

Authors:  Xiaohui Xu; Hui Hu; Sandie Ha; Jeffrey Roth
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Pregnancy outcome of women in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiow-Ing Wang; Long-Teng Lee; Ming-Lun Zou; Chen-Wei Fan; Chin-Liang Yaung
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to estimate public health impacts of PM2.5 from individual power plants.

Authors:  Jonathan J Buonocore; Xinyi Dong; John D Spengler; Joshua S Fu; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Amy D Lamson; Susan C Anenberg; Karen Wesson; David Risley; Bryan J Hubbell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  First trimester exposure to ambient air pollution, pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in Allegheny County, PA.

Authors:  Pei-Chen Lee; James M Roberts; Janet M Catov; Evelyn O Talbott; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-04

6.  Increased risk of preterm delivery in women residing near thermal power plants in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shang-Shyue Tsai; Hsin-Su Yu; Chih-Ching Chang; Hung-Yi Chuang; Chun-Yuh Yang
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  2004-09

7.  Residential mobility during pregnancy and the potential for ambient air pollution exposure misclassification.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Erin M Bell; Alissa R Caton; Charlotte M Druschel; Shao Lin
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Francesca Dominici; Roger D Peng; Michelle L Bell; Luu Pham; Aidan McDermott; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Outdoor air pollution and respiratory health in patients with COPD.

Authors:  Janet L Peacock; H Ross Anderson; Stephen A Bremner; Louise Marston; Terence A Seemungal; David P Strachan; Jadwiga A Wedzicha
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Association between local traffic-generated air pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Cizao Ren; Ralph J Delfino; Judith Chung; Michelle Wilhelm; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  12 in total

1.  Retirements of Coal and Oil Power Plants in California: Association With Reduced Preterm Birth Among Populations Nearby.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Deborah Karasek; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Dana E Goin; Kristina Dang; Paula A Braveman; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Environmental chemicals and preterm birth: Biological mechanisms and the state of the science.

Authors:  Kelly K Ferguson; Helen B Chin
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-01-27

3.  Association between county-level coal-fired power plant pollution and racial disparities in preterm births from 2000 to 2018.

Authors:  Misbath Daouda; Lucas Henneman; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Alison Gemmill; Corwin Zigler; Joan Casey
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.793

4.  Environmental justice and power plant emissions in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states.

Authors:  Juan Declet-Barreto; Andrew A Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Hazardous Air Pollutants and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Portland, OR.

Authors:  Mary Willis; Perry Hystad
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-12

6.  Bayesian G-Computation for Estimating Impacts of Interventions on Exposure Mixtures: Demonstration With Metals From Coal-Fired Power Plants and Birth Weight.

Authors:  Alexander P Keil; Jessie P Buckley; Amy E Kalkbrenner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Impact of Coal-fired Power Plant Emissions on Children's Health: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiological Literature.

Authors:  Eric Amster; Clara Lew Levy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Industrial Air Pollution Leads to Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematized Review of Different Exposure Metrics and Health Effects in Newborns.

Authors:  Triin Veber; Usha Dahal; Katrin Lang; Kati Orru; Hans Orru
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2022-08-10

9.  Increase in fertility following coal and oil power plant retirements in California.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Alison Gemmill; Deborah Karasek; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Dana E Goin; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Birth Cohorts in Highly Contaminated Sites: A Tool for Monitoring the Relationships Between Environmental Pollutants and Children's Health.

Authors:  Gaspare Drago; Silvia Ruggieri; Fabrizio Bianchi; Silvestre Sampino; Fabio Cibella
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.