Firefly luciferase is homologous to fatty acyl-CoA synthetases. We hypothesized that the firefly luciferase substrate d-luciferin and its analogs are fatty acid mimics that are ideally suited to probe the chemistry of enzymes that release fatty acid products. Here, we synthesized luciferin amides and found that these molecules are hydrolyzed to substrates for firefly luciferase by the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). In the presence of luciferase, these molecules enable highly sensitive and selective bioluminescent detection of FAAH activity in vitro, in live cells, and in vivo. The potency and tissue distribution of FAAH inhibitors can be imaged in live mice, and luciferin amides serve as exemplary reagents for greatly improved bioluminescence imaging in FAAH-expressing tissues such as the brain.
Firefly luciferase is homologous to fatty acyl-CoA synthetases. We hypothesized that the firefly luciferase substrate d-luciferin and its analogs are fatty acid mimics that are ideally suited to probe the chemistry of enzymes that release fatty acid products. Here, we synthesized luciferin amides and found that these molecules are hydrolyzed to substrates for firefly luciferase by the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). In the presence of luciferase, these molecules enable highly sensitive and selective bioluminescent detection of FAAH activity in vitro, in live cells, and in vivo. The potency and tissue distribution of FAAH inhibitors can be imaged in live mice, and luciferin amides serve as exemplary reagents for greatly improved bioluminescence imaging in FAAH-expressing tissues such as the brain.
Firefly luciferase is best known
for its light emission chemistry with d-luciferin, but it
is also a long-chain fatty acyl-CoA synthetase (ACSL) that can bind
fatty acid substrates such as arachidonic acid (Figure ).[1] Conversely,
we have recently shown that an ACSL from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a latent luciferase that
can emit light with a synthetic luciferin.[2] In both cases, adenylation of a carboxylic acid is the first step
in catalysis. Furthermore, both enzymes can bind fatty acids ranging
from octanoic acid to arachidonic acid, suggesting that d-luciferin and aminoluciferin analogs[3−5] are acting as fatty acid
mimics. Based in part on this observation, we hypothesized that luciferins
are ideally suited to probe the chemistry of enzymes that release
fatty acid products.
Figure 1
(A) Firefly luciferase catalyzes light emission from d-luciferin. (B) Firefly luciferase is also a fatty acyl-CoA
synthetase.
(C) FAAH cleaves anandamide to arachidonic acid. (D) Luciferin amides
could allow bioluminescence imaging of FAAH activity.
Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is a
serine hydrolase that limits
the lifetime and sphere of action of fatty acid amide second messengers
by hydrolysis to their corresponding fatty acids (Figure ).[6,7] Most
notably, arachidonoyl ethanolamine (anandamide) is a locally generated
agonist for the cannabinoid receptor CB1. Inhibition of FAAH prolongs
the action of anandamide and is therefore an attractive drug target
for the treatment of pain, anxiety, and cannabinoid dependence.[6] Many FAAH inhibitors are being developed as potential
therapeutics, and there is great interest in detecting FAAH activity in vivo.[8] Current techniques
to assay FAAH inhibitors in mice primarily require sacrificing the
mouse, homogenizing the tissues, adding radioactive lipid substrates,
and HPLC analysis of the products.[9] This
places large demands on time and quantities of mice required to evaluate
inhibitors and furthermore cannot give longitudinal data from the
same animal. Some inroads have been made with PET imaging probes for
FAAH, but these are specialized and expensive tools with low throughput
and signal-to-noise that lack the specificity for whole-body imaging.[8](A) Firefly luciferase catalyzes light emission from d-luciferin. (B) Firefly luciferase is also a fatty acyl-CoA
synthetase.
(C) FAAH cleaves anandamide to arachidonic acid. (D) Luciferin amides
could allow bioluminescence imaging of FAAH activity.FAAH readily accepts a wide range of saturated
and unsaturated
fatty acid amides in addition to anandamide[7,10] and
has been shown to hydrolyze ethanolamides, primary amides, and methyl
amides.[7,10,11] We therefore
hypothesized that FAAH could hydrolyze luciferin amides to their respective
carboxylates, resulting in the formation of a luminogenic luciferase
substrate (Figure ). Here we show that luciferin amides allow exquisitely selective
and sensitive imaging of endogenous FAAH activity in live cells and
in live mice. FAAH is both necessary and sufficient for bioluminescence
to occur and is the only enzyme activating these probes. The performance
of FAAH inhibitors can be imaged in live mice, and inhibitors that
cross the blood-brain barrier can be readily distinguished from those
that cannot. Moreover, the amount of luciferinamide probe needed
to perform this imaging is >1000-fold lower than typical d-luciferin imaging conditions but nonetheless improves overall signal
from the brain. Thus, luciferin amides also excel at delivering luciferins
into FAAH-expressing cells and tissues.To test our initial
hypothesis, we synthesized four luciferin amides
(Figure ) by the condensation
of electrophilic nitriles[3,5] with a d-cysteine
amide (see Supporting Information). Without
a free carboxylate, these luciferin analogs are not light-emitting
substrates for purified firefly luciferase (Figures and S1). Pretreatment
of the luciferin amides with recombinant ratFAAH[12] restores luminescent activity and could be specifically
blocked by incubation with FAAH inhibitors such as PF3845 (Figures and S1).[13] The presence
of FAAH or FAAH inhibitors has no effect on light emitted from the
parent luciferins (Figures and S1). Thus, luciferin amides
can be used to detect FAAH activity and inhibition in vitro.
Figure 2
(A) FAAH inhibitor structures. (B) Photon flux from the indicated
luciferin analog (10 μM) normalized to emission in the presence
of FAAH with no FAAH inhibitor. The assay was performed in triplicate
and is represented as the mean ± SEM.
(A) FAAH inhibitor structures. (B) Photon flux from the indicated
luciferin analog (10 μM) normalized to emission in the presence
of FAAH with no FAAH inhibitor. The assay was performed in triplicate
and is represented as the mean ± SEM.We next sought to determine whether luciferin amides were
specific
to FAAH and sensitive enough to enable the detection of FAAH activity
in live cells. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are known to express
FAAH,[14] an integral membrane protein,[6] but at levels insufficient to detect with fluorescence-based
assays.[15] In contrast, treatment of luciferase-expressing
CHO cells with luciferin amides resulted in robust bioluminescence
(Figures A and S2). Potentially, in the complex environment
of the cell, luciferin amides could be cleaved by proteases or other
serine hydrolases. However, treatment with PF3845, which specifically
inhibits FAAH but no other serine hydrolases,[13] blocked emission from luciferin amides but had no effect on luciferase
activity in the presence of the parent luciferin (Figure A). Furthermore, inhibitors
of other serine hydrolases had no effect, and we evaluated the potency
of a wide range of FAAH inhibitors in the natural context of live
cell membranes (Figures S3 and S4). Lacking
an ionizedcarboxylate, the luciferin amides also served as excellent
luciferin delivery vehicles in these FAAH-expressing cells, yielding
higher bioluminescence signals than their parent luciferins at concentrations
<100 μM (Figure S2). CycLuc1-methyl
amide achieved higher maximal photon flux than CycLuc1-amide, presumably
because uncleaved CycLuc1-amide can ultimately inhibit luciferase,
while CycLuc1-methyl amide cannot (Figures S2
and S5).
Figure 3
(A) Relative photon flux from live luciferase-expressing
CHO cells
treated with the indicated luciferins and luciferin amides (125 μM)
in the absence (black bars) or presence (red bars) of the FAAH inhibitor
PF3845. The data are normalized to the uninhibited sample for each
luciferin (black bars). (B) Relative flux from live luciferase-expressing
HeLa cells treated with the same set of substrates after transfection
with empty pcDNA3.1 vector (black bars), pcDNA3.1-hFAAH (blue bars),
or pcDNA3.1-hFAAH and treatment with the FAAH inhibitor PF3845 (red
bars). The data are normalized to the uninhibited hFAAH-transfected
sample for each luciferin (blue bars). All assays were performed in
triplicate and are represented as the mean ± SEM.
(A) Relative photon flux from live luciferase-expressing
CHO cells
treated with the indicated luciferins and luciferin amides (125 μM)
in the absence (black bars) or presence (red bars) of the FAAH inhibitor
PF3845. The data are normalized to the uninhibited sample for each
luciferin (black bars). (B) Relative flux from live luciferase-expressing
HeLa cells treated with the same set of substrates after transfection
with empty pcDNA3.1 vector (black bars), pcDNA3.1-hFAAH (blue bars),
or pcDNA3.1-hFAAH and treatment with the FAAH inhibitor PF3845 (red
bars). The data are normalized to the uninhibited hFAAH-transfected
sample for each luciferin (blue bars). All assays were performed in
triplicate and are represented as the mean ± SEM.HeLa cells do not express FAAH,[16,17] and luciferinamides do not yield bioluminescence in luciferase-expressing HeLa
cells (Figure B).
Transfection of HeLa cells with humanFAAH enabled bioluminescence
with luciferin amides (Figures B and S2). Specific inhibition
of the transfected FAAH with PF3845 blocked bioluminescence (Figure B) and the potency
of FAAH inhibitors could be evaluated in these FAAH-transfected live
cells (Figure S3). FAAH has been shown
to cleave some fatty acid esters,[11] and
we find that it indeed also contributes to the cleavage of CycLuc1ethyl ester (Figure S6). However, unlike
CycLuc1amides, the ethyl ester of CycLuc1 is not exclusively cleaved
by FAAH and is hydrolyzed to CycLuc1 in both CHO and HeLa cells (Figure S6).In mice, FAAH is highly expressed
in the brain.[9] We thus expected that luciferinamides would result in
strong brain bioluminescence in luciferase-expressing mice if able
to access this tissue. We used adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) to
express luciferase only in the brain striatum.[18] The amides are less water-soluble than the parent carboxylates,
necessitating a lower imaging dose. Nonetheless, CycLuc1-amide yielded
dramatically higher photon flux in these mice than the parent luciferinCycLuc1 or the conventional substrate d-luciferin (Figure ). A 400-fold lower
dose of CycLuc1-amide was markedly superior to the standard imaging
dose of d-luciferin (Figure ). Even 1000-fold lower doses yielded higher brain
bioluminescence than d-luciferin (Figure
S7).
Figure 4
CycLuc1-amide compared to d-Luciferin for bioluminescence
imaging in live mice expressing luciferase in (A) the brain or (B)
the heart and leg muscles. Quantification is represented as the mean
± SEM for n = 3 mice.
CycLuc1-amide compared to d-Luciferin for bioluminescence
imaging in live mice expressing luciferase in (A) the brain or (B)
the heart and leg muscles. Quantification is represented as the mean
± SEM for n = 3 mice.Pretreatment with PF3845 (Figure ), which has been demonstrated to inhibit
only FAAH
in mice,[13] completely blocked brain bioluminescence
when using luciferin amides (Figure S8).
Tail-vein injection of AAV9-CMV-luc2 primarily transduces heart[19] and leg muscles (Figure ), tissues where FAAH activity has been reported
to be absent.[9] In these mice, luciferinamides yielded dramatically lower photon flux than could be achieved
with their parent luciferins (Figure ). By contrast, CycLuc1 ethyl ester was on par with
equal doses of the parent luciferin in the heart and leg muscles,
but ineffective in the brain (Figure ). These differences likely reflect the location of
the liberating enzymatic activity and biodistribution of the more
hydrophobic ester.To visualize FAAH activity throughout the
mouse, we next turned
to transgenic mice that express luciferase in all tissues.[20] When d-luciferin or CycLuc1 is introduced
into these mice, the weakest light emission is from the head, and
bioluminescence is dominated by superficial tissues (Figures and S9). In marked contrast, injection of CycLuc1-amide revealed the strongest
bioluminescence signals from the brain and kidneys (Figure ), tissues known to have high
FAAH activity.[9] Ventral bioluminescence
was less well-defined, which may reflect rapid transit of released
luciferin out of FAAH-expressing tissues such as the liver (Figure S9). Pretreatment of mice with PF3845
completely blocked bioluminescence from luciferin amides in the brain
and in all peripheral tissues (Figures , S10, and S11) but had
no effect on bioluminescence from the parent luciferins (Figure S12). The aminoluciferin amides (Figure ) readily sense FAAH
activity in vivo (Figure S9), and can be imaged at extremely low doses (as low as 8 nmol/kg; Figure S13). Although d-luciferin amide
senses FAAH activity in vitro and in live cells,
it works poorly in live mice and cannot sense FAAH activity in the
brain (Figure S9). This is consistent with
our contention that the improved biodistribution properties of aminoluciferins
and low Km values render them superior
for use as luminogenic sensors in vivo.[4] Interestingly, CycLuc1-methyl amide did not exhibit
an advantage over CycLuc1-amide in the mouse (Figure S9). Presumably, inhibition of luciferase by uncleaved
luciferin primary amides is not an issue at the substrate concentrations
achieved in vivo.
Figure 5
(A) Bioluminescence imaging with CycLuc1
or CycLuc1-amide in ubiquitously
expressing transgenic luciferase mice treated with vehicle only or
the indicated FAAH inhibitor. (B) Total flux from the brain and kidneys
quantitated as a function of inhibitor concentration and normalized
to the vehicle-only signal, represented as the mean ± SEM for n = 3 mice. Data were fit by nonlinear regression to determine
relative IC50 values in the brain (PF3845, 0.14 mg/kg;
URB597, 0.40 mg/kg; URB937, ND) and kidneys (PF3845, 0.03 mg/kg; URB597,
0.07 mg/kg; URB937, 0.33 mg/kg).
(A) Bioluminescence imaging with CycLuc1
or CycLuc1-amide in ubiquitously
expressing transgenic luciferase mice treated with vehicle only or
the indicated FAAH inhibitor. (B) Total flux from the brain and kidneys
quantitated as a function of inhibitor concentration and normalized
to the vehicle-only signal, represented as the mean ± SEM for n = 3 mice. Data were fit by nonlinear regression to determine
relative IC50 values in the brain (PF3845, 0.14 mg/kg;
URB597, 0.40 mg/kg; URB937, ND) and kidneys (PF3845, 0.03 mg/kg; URB597,
0.07 mg/kg; URB937, 0.33 mg/kg).Finally, we sought to determine whether luciferin amides
could
be used to evaluate the tissue distribution of prospective FAAH inhibitors,
which can have important effects on their efficacy.[21] URB937 is a brain-impermeable FAAH inhibitor that differs
from the global FAAH inhibitor URB597 by a single hydroxyl group (Figure ).[21] Bioluminescence imaging with CycLuc1-amide confirmed that
URB597 inhibits FAAH activity in both peripheral and brain tissues
(Figures , S10, and S11), whereas no inhibition of FAAH
activity is detected in the brains of URB937-treated mice (Figure ).Many bioluminescent
sensors have been described based on “caged”
pro-luciferins that can release a luciferin upon the action of an
enzyme or reactive small molecule.[4,23] The labile
moiety is distinct from the luciferin and often separated by a self-immolative
linker.[24] A limitation of this approach
is that the luciferin itself is not contributing to specific recognition
or selectivity; the best one can hope for is that its presence is
innocuous. Our approach embraces the inherent fatty acid mimetic properties
of luciferin analogs to create sensors for enzymes that release fatty
acids. The power of this approach is borne out in the exquisite specificity
and sensitivity of luciferin amides for FAAH even in vivo, simply by replacing an oxygen atom with nitrogen (Figure ). Furthermore, we find that
luminogenic sensors based on high-affinity, cell-permeable aminoluciferins
perform better in mice than those based on d-luciferin. As
the number of structurally distinct luciferin analogs grows,[4,5] we anticipate there will be additional opportunities to build sensors
based on the inherent properties of the luciferin itself.In
summary, we have found that luciferin amides are highly sensitive
and selective reporters of FAAH activity. These sensors readily translate
from in vitro assays to live cells to in
vivo imaging to report on the activity of a single enzyme
in its natural context. The bioluminescence approach described herein
reveals otherwise invisible endogenous enzymatic activity in live
cells and mice and more broadly allows imaging of the biodistribution
consequences of subtle modifications to a prospective therapeutic
inhibitor in vivo (e.g., ability to cross the blood-brain
barrier). Further refinement and modification of the structure of
the luciferin[4,5] and the scissile bond could potentially
allow extension of this bioluminescence detection approach to other
enzymes.[25,26] Finally, luciferin amides are excellent
reagents for increasing the sensitivity of bioluminescence imaging
in FAAH-expressing cells and tissues, such as the brain, and allow
orders of magnitude lower imaging doses than the natural luciferase
substrate.
Authors: Yu-An Cao; Amy J Wagers; Andreas Beilhack; Joan Dusich; Michael H Bachmann; Robert S Negrin; Irving L Weissman; Christopher H Contag Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-12-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Manjunath K Ramarao; Elizabeth A Murphy; Marina W H Shen; Yuren Wang; Kristen N Bushell; Nelson Huang; Ning Pan; Cara Williams; James D Clark Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: Katsuya Inagaki; Sally Fuess; Theresa A Storm; Gregory A Gibson; Charles F Mctiernan; Mark A Kay; Hiroyuki Nakai Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Allegra T Aron; Marie C Heffern; Zachery R Lonergan; Mark N Vander Wal; Brian R Blank; Benjamin Spangler; Yaofang Zhang; Hyo Min Park; Andreas Stahl; Adam R Renslo; Eric P Skaar; Christopher J Chang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mira D Liu; Elliot A Warner; Charlotte E Morrissey; Caitlyn W Fick; Taia S Wu; Marya Y Ornelas; Gabriela V Ochoa; Brendan S Zhang; Colin M Rathbun; William B Porterfield; Jennifer A Prescher; Aaron M Leconte Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Spencer T Adams; David M Mofford; G S Kiran Kumar Reddy; Stephen C Miller Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 15.336