Literature DB >> 26119267

Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Anwar R Padhani2, Thomas L Chenevert3, Dow-Mu Koh4, Frederik De Keyzer5, Bachir Taouli6, Denis Le Bihan7.   

Abstract

Technologic advances enable performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at ultrahigh b-values, where standard monoexponential model analysis may not apply. Rather, non-Gaussian water diffusion properties emerge, which in cellular tissues are, in part, influenced by the intracellular environment that is not well evaluated by conventional DWI. The novel technique, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), enables characterization of non-Gaussian water diffusion behavior. More advanced mathematical curve fitting of the signal intensity decay curve using the DKI model provides an additional parameter Kapp that presumably reflects heterogeneity and irregularity of cellular microstructure, as well as the amount of interfaces within cellular tissues. Although largely applied for neural applications over the past decade, a small number of studies have recently explored DKI outside the brain. The most investigated organ is the prostate, with preliminary studies suggesting improved tumor detection and grading using DKI. Although still largely in the research phase, DKI is being explored in wider clinical settings. When assessing extracranial applications of DKI, careful attention to details with which body radiologists may currently be unfamiliar is important to ensure reliable results. Accordingly, a robust understanding of DKI is necessary for radiologists to better understand the meaning of DKI-derived metrics in the context of different tumors and how these metrics vary between tumor types and in response to treatment. In this review, we outline DKI principles, propose biostructural basis for observations, provide a comparison with standard monoexponential fitting and the apparent diffusion coefficient, report on extracranial clinical investigations to date, and recommend technical considerations for implementation in body imaging.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; apparent diffusion coefficient; cancer; diffusion kurtosis imaging; diffusion weighted imaging; tissue structure

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26119267     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  84 in total

1.  Preliminary study of diffusion kurtosis imaging in thyroid nodules and its histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Ruo-Yang Shi; Qiu-Ying Yao; Qin-Yi Zhou; Qing Lu; Shi-Teng Suo; Jun Chen; Wen-Jie Zheng; Yong-Ming Dai; Lian-Ming Wu; Jian-Rong Xu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging as a Tool in Neurotoxicology.

Authors:  Brian Hansen
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.911

3.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) incorporation into an intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR model to measure cerebral hypoperfusion induced by hyperventilation challenge in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Aude Pavilla; Giulio Gambarota; Alessandro Arrigo; Mehdi Mejdoubi; Régis Duvauferrier; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Preoperative evaluation of small bowel complications in Crohn's disease: comparison of diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  M Barat; C Hoeffel; M Bouquot; A S Jannot; R Dautry; M Boudiaf; K Pautrat; R Kaci; M Camus; C Eveno; M Pocard; P Soyer; A Dohan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Differentiating between malignant and benign solid solitary pulmonary lesions: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging superior to conventional diffusion-weighted imaging?

Authors:  Qi Wan; Ying-Shi Deng; Qiang Lei; Ying-Ying Bao; Yu-Ze Wang; Jia-Xuan Zhou; Qiao Zou; Xin-Chun Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Fast diffusion kurtosis imaging of fibrotic mouse kidneys.

Authors:  B F Kjølby; A R Khan; A Chuhutin; L Pedersen; J B Jensen; S Jakobsen; D Zeidler; R Sangill; J R Nyengaard; S N Jespersen; B Hansen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Prediction of the treatment outcome using intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusional kurtosis imaging in nasal or sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Noriyuki Fujima; Daisuke Yoshida; Tomohiro Sakashita; Akihiro Homma; Akiko Tsukahara; Yukie Shimizu; Khin Khin Tha; Kohsuke Kudo; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Design and validation of diffusion MRI models of white matter.

Authors:  Ileana O Jelescu; Matthew D Budde
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2017-11-28

Review 9.  Multiparametric MR Imaging in Abdominal Malignancies.

Authors:  Antonio Luna; Shivani Pahwa; Claudio Bonini; Lidia Alcalá-Mata; Katherine L Wright; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Abnormal structural and functional hypothalamic connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Yongxia Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.