Tyler A Bosch1, Lisa Chow2, Donald R Dengel3, Susan J Melhorn4, Mary Webb4, Danielle Yancey4, Holly Callahan4, Mary Rosalyn B De Leon4, Vidhi Tyagi5, Ellen A Schur4. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MMC 101, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: bosch041@umn.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MMC 101, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. 3. School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, 1900 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Box 359780, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. 5. Simmons College, 300 Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We recently reported sex-specific percent body fat (%BF) thresholds (males=23%, females=38%) above which, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) significantly increases. Using monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, we examined the influence of genetics on regional fat distribution measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, above and below these sex-specific thresholds for VAT accumulation. METHODS: Fifty-eight twin pairs (44 MZ, 14 DZ) were recruited from the University of Washington Twin Registry. Segmented linear regression was used to assess the threshold between VAT mass and %BF by sex and by zygosity. To assess the effect of genetics on VAT accumulation, Dunnett's T3 compared MZ and DZ pairs whether the twin pairs were both above the adiposity threshold or not. RESULTS: %BF thresholds for VAT accumulation were identified (%BF: M=20.6%, F=39.4%). Zygosity-specific thresholds were not significantly different (p>0.05). If at least one twin was below threshold, DZ twins still exhibited greater within-pair differences than MZ pairs in %BF (p=0.023) but not VAT (p=0.121). CONCLUSIONS: Using a twin study approach, we observed no difference by zygosity for the threshold as which VAT accumulates. Additionally, for the first time we observed that while total BF is influenced by genetics, VAT accumulation may depend more on whether a person's %BF is above their sex-specific adiposity threshold. These results suggest that there may not be a genetic predisposition for VAT accumulation but rather it is a result of a predisposition for total fat accumulation.
OBJECTIVE: We recently reported sex-specific percent body fat (%BF) thresholds (males=23%, females=38%) above which, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) significantly increases. Using monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, we examined the influence of genetics on regional fat distribution measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, above and below these sex-specific thresholds for VAT accumulation. METHODS: Fifty-eight twin pairs (44 MZ, 14 DZ) were recruited from the University of Washington Twin Registry. Segmented linear regression was used to assess the threshold between VAT mass and %BF by sex and by zygosity. To assess the effect of genetics on VAT accumulation, Dunnett's T3 compared MZ and DZ pairs whether the twin pairs were both above the adiposity threshold or not. RESULTS: %BF thresholds for VAT accumulation were identified (%BF: M=20.6%, F=39.4%). Zygosity-specific thresholds were not significantly different (p>0.05). If at least one twin was below threshold, DZ twins still exhibited greater within-pair differences than MZ pairs in %BF (p=0.023) but not VAT (p=0.121). CONCLUSIONS: Using a twin study approach, we observed no difference by zygosity for the threshold as which VAT accumulates. Additionally, for the first time we observed that while total BF is influenced by genetics, VAT accumulation may depend more on whether a person's %BF is above their sex-specific adiposity threshold. These results suggest that there may not be a genetic predisposition for VAT accumulation but rather it is a result of a predisposition for total fat accumulation.
Authors: Charlotte Malis; Eva L Rasmussen; Pernille Poulsen; Inge Petersen; Kaare Christensen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Arne Astrup; Allan A Vaag Journal: Obes Res Date: 2005-12
Authors: Ian J Neeland; Aslan T Turer; Colby R Ayers; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Gloria L Vega; Ramin Farzaneh-Far; Scott M Grundy; Amit Khera; Darren K McGuire; James A de Lemos Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sanjiv Kaul; Megan P Rothney; Dawn M Peters; Wynn K Wacker; Cynthia E Davis; Michael D Shapiro; David L Ergun Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Siobhán E McQuaid; Leanne Hodson; Matthew J Neville; A Louise Dennis; Jane Cheeseman; Sandy M Humphreys; Toralph Ruge; Marjorie Gilbert; Barbara A Fielding; Keith N Frayn; Fredrik Karpe Journal: Diabetes Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Aaron S Kelly; Alexander M Kaizer; Tyler A Bosch; Kyle D Rudser; Justin R Ryder; Amy C Gross; Lisa S Chow; Claudia K Fox; Donald R Dengel Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Tyler A Bosch; Aaron F Carbuhn; Philip R Stanforth; Jonathan M Oliver; Kathryn A Keller; Donald R Dengel Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Diana Vetter; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Mira Giama; Hanna Hosa; Markus K Muller; Antonio Nocito; Marc Schiesser; Rudolf Moos; Marco Bueter Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Susan J Melhorn; Mary K Askren; Wendy K Chung; Mario Kratz; Tyler A Bosch; Vidhi Tyagi; Mary F Webb; Mary Rosalynn B De Leon; Thomas J Grabowski; Rudolph L Leibel; Ellen A Schur Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 7.045