Literature DB >> 28277428

Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density of Division 1 Collegiate Football Players: A Consortium of College Athlete Research Study.

Tyler A Bosch1, Aaron F Carbuhn2, Philip R Stanforth3, Jonathan M Oliver4, Kathryn A Keller5, Donald R Dengel5.   

Abstract

Bosch, TA, Carbuhn, AF, Stanforth, PR, Oliver, JM, Keller, KA, and Dengel, DR. Body composition and bone mineral density of Division 1 collegiate football players: a consortium of college athlete research study. J Strength Cond Res 33(5): 1339-1346, 2019-The purpose of this study was to generate normative data for total and regional body composition in Division 1 collegiate football players using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and examine positional differences in total and regional measurements. Data were used from the Consortium of College Athlete Research (C-CAR) group. Four hundred sixty-seven players were included in this study. Height, body mass, total and regional fat mass, lean mass, and bone mineral density were measured in each athlete in the preseason (June-August). Players were categorized by their offensive or defensive position for comparisons. Linemen tended to have the higher fat and lean mass measures (p ≤ 0.05 for all) compared with other positions. Positions that mirror each other (e.g. linemen) had similar body composition and body ratios. All positions were classified as overweight or obese based on body mass index (BMI) (>25 kg·m), yet other than offensive and defensive linemen, all positions had healthy percent body fat (13-20%) and low visceral fat mass (<500 g). The data presented here provide normative positional data for total and regional fat mass, lean mass, and bone density in Division 1 collegiate football players. Player position had a significant effect on body composition measures and is likely associated with on-field positional requirements. From a player's health perspective, although all positions had relatively high BMI values, most positions had relatively low body fat and visceral fat, which is important for the health of players during and after their playing career. The increased accuracy and reliability of DXA provides greater information, regarding positional differences in college football players compared with other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 28277428      PMCID: PMC5591058          DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  27 in total

1.  The effects of training history, player position, and body composition on exercise performance in collegiate football players.

Authors:  Todd A Miller; Edward D White; Keith A Kinley; Jerome J Congleton; Michael J Clark
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The body composition of a college football team.

Authors:  J D Wickkiser; J M Kelly
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1975

3.  Body composition in Division I football players.

Authors:  Mary Barth Noel; Jaci L VanHeest; Phil Zaneteas; Carol D Rodgers
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D F Murphy; D A J Connolly; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Body size, body composition, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in NFL players.

Authors:  Thomas W Allen; Robert A Vogel; Andrew E Lincoln; Reginald E Dunn; Andrew M Tucker
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Body composition of collegiate football players: bioelectrical impedance and skinfolds compared to hydrostatic weighing.

Authors:  R A Oppliger; D H Nielsen; A C Shetler; E T Crowley; J P Albright
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in collegiate American football players, by position.

Authors:  Emily Millard Mathews; Dale R Wagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

8.  Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in retired National Football League players.

Authors:  Marc A Miller; Lori B Croft; Adam R Belanger; Abel Romero-Corral; Virend K Somers; Arthur J Roberts; Martin E Goldman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among National Football League players.

Authors:  Andrew M Tucker; Robert A Vogel; Andrew E Lincoln; Reginald E Dunn; Debra C Ahrensfield; Thomas W Allen; Lon W Castle; Robert A Heyer; Elliot J Pellman; Patrick J Strollo; Peter W F Wilson; Anthony P Yates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in Division 1 collegiate football players.

Authors:  James R Borchers; Kelley L Clem; Diane L Habash; Haikady N Nagaraja; Lisa M Stokley; Thomas M Best
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characteristics of total body and appendicular bone mineral content and density in Japanese collegiate Sumo wrestlers.

Authors:  Taishi Midorikawa; Suguru Torii; Megumi Ohta; Shizuo Sakamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  New Frontiers of Body Composition in Sport.

Authors:  Henry Lukaski; Christiana J Raymond-Pope
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  The Relationship between Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density of Female Workers in A Unit of Tai'an.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Siqi Wang; Zhengxiu Chen; Zhangshen Ran
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.