Literature DB >> 12907124

ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 45, August 2003. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995).

.   

Abstract

Although cervical cancer was the leading cause of cancer death in American women as recently as the 1930s, both the incidence and mortality from cervical cancer have decreased by almost one half since the early 1970s, largely as a result of widespread screening with the Pap test. However, the annual incidence rate has remained at approximately 8 cases per 100,000 women over the past few years. New technology for performing cervical cytology is evolving rapidly as are recommendations for classifying and interpreting the results. The purpose of this document is to provide a review of the best available evidence on screening for cervical cancer. Specific equipment and techniques for performing cervical cytology and interpretation of the results are discussed elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12907124     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00745-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  44 in total

Review 1.  Impact of clinical practice guidelines on the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Peter H Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of electronic health record data to evaluate overuse of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Jason S Mathias; Dana Gossett; David W Baker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Brief report: Housestaff adherence to cervical cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Beverly A Forsyth; Julie R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Papanicolaou testing among women in the southern United States.

Authors:  Neeraja B Peterson; Harvey J Murff; Yong Cui; Margaret Hargreaves; Jay H Fowke
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  Cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Dorothy J Wiley; Bradley J Monk; Emmanuel Masongsong; Kristina Morgan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Type-specific HPV and Pap test results among low-income, underserved women: providing insights into management strategies.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Vicki B Benard; April A Greek; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; L Stewart Massad; George F Sawaya; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Cost is a barrier to widespread use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening in Korea.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Colposcopic evaluation of cervix with persistent inflammatory Pap smear: A prospective analytical study.

Authors:  Papa Dasari; S Rajathi; Surendra V Kumar
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  Market survey predictions on the future of US Pap testing.

Authors:  R Marshall Austin; Barbara Benstein; Joel Bentz; Sandra Bigner; Gregory G Freund; Gregory La Rocco; Ibrahim Ramzy; Lynnette Savaloja; Vinod B Shidham
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.