BACKGROUND: A systematic assessment of potential disease-modifying compounds for Parkinson's disease concluded that pioglitazone could hold promise for the treatment of patients with this disease. We assessed the effect of pioglitazone on the progression of Parkinson's disease in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, futility clinical trial. METHODS:Participants with the diagnosis of early Parkinson's disease on a stable regimen of 1 mg/day rasagiline or 10 mg/day selegiline were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 15 mg/day pioglitazone, 45 mg/day pioglitazone, or placebo. Investigators were masked to the treatment assignment. Only the statistical centre and the central pharmacy knew the treatment name associated with the randomisation number. The primary outcome was the change in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score between the baseline and 44 weeks, analysed by intention to treat. The primary null hypothesis for each dose group was that the mean change in UPDRS was 3 points less than the mean change in the placebo group. The alternative hypothesis (of futility) was that pioglitazone is not meaningfully different from placebo. We rejected the null if there was significant evidence of futility at the one-sided alpha level of 0·10. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01280123. FINDINGS:210 patients from 35 sites in the USA were enrolled between May 10, 2011, and July 31, 2013. The primary analysis included 72 patients in the 15 mg group, 67 in the 45 mg group, and 71 in the placebo group. The mean total UPDRS change at 44 weeks was 4·42 (95% CI 2·55-6·28) for 15 mg pioglitazone, 5·13 (95% CI 3·17-7·08) for 45 mg pioglitazone, and 6·25 (95% CI 4·35-8·15) for placebo (higher change scores are worse). The mean difference between the 15 mg and placebo groups was -1·83 (80% CI -3·56 to -0·10) and the null hypothesis could not be rejected (p=0·19). The mean difference between the 45 mg and placebo groups was -1·12 (80% CI -2·93 to 0·69) and the null hypothesis was rejected in favour of futility (p=0·09). Planned sensitivity analyses of the primary outcome, using last value carried forward (LVCF) to handle missing data and using the completers' only sample, suggested that the 15 mg dose is also futile (p=0·09 for LVCF, p=0·09 for completers) but failed to reject the null hypothesis for the 45 mg dose (p=0·12 for LVCF, p=0·19 for completers). Six serious adverse events occurred in the 15 mg group, nine in the 45 mg group, and three in the placebo group; none were thought to be definitely or probably related to the study interventions. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that pioglitazone at the doses studied here is unlikely to modify progression in early Parkinson's disease. Further study of pioglitazone in a larger trial in patients with Parkinson's disease is not recommended. FUNDING: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A systematic assessment of potential disease-modifying compounds for Parkinson's disease concluded that pioglitazone could hold promise for the treatment of patients with this disease. We assessed the effect of pioglitazone on the progression of Parkinson's disease in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, futility clinical trial. METHODS:Participants with the diagnosis of early Parkinson's disease on a stable regimen of 1 mg/day rasagiline or 10 mg/day selegiline were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 15 mg/day pioglitazone, 45 mg/day pioglitazone, or placebo. Investigators were masked to the treatment assignment. Only the statistical centre and the central pharmacy knew the treatment name associated with the randomisation number. The primary outcome was the change in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score between the baseline and 44 weeks, analysed by intention to treat. The primary null hypothesis for each dose group was that the mean change in UPDRS was 3 points less than the mean change in the placebo group. The alternative hypothesis (of futility) was that pioglitazone is not meaningfully different from placebo. We rejected the null if there was significant evidence of futility at the one-sided alpha level of 0·10. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01280123. FINDINGS: 210 patients from 35 sites in the USA were enrolled between May 10, 2011, and July 31, 2013. The primary analysis included 72 patients in the 15 mg group, 67 in the 45 mg group, and 71 in the placebo group. The mean total UPDRS change at 44 weeks was 4·42 (95% CI 2·55-6·28) for 15 mg pioglitazone, 5·13 (95% CI 3·17-7·08) for 45 mg pioglitazone, and 6·25 (95% CI 4·35-8·15) for placebo (higher change scores are worse). The mean difference between the 15 mg and placebo groups was -1·83 (80% CI -3·56 to -0·10) and the null hypothesis could not be rejected (p=0·19). The mean difference between the 45 mg and placebo groups was -1·12 (80% CI -2·93 to 0·69) and the null hypothesis was rejected in favour of futility (p=0·09). Planned sensitivity analyses of the primary outcome, using last value carried forward (LVCF) to handle missing data and using the completers' only sample, suggested that the 15 mg dose is also futile (p=0·09 for LVCF, p=0·09 for completers) but failed to reject the null hypothesis for the 45 mg dose (p=0·12 for LVCF, p=0·19 for completers). Six serious adverse events occurred in the 15 mg group, nine in the 45 mg group, and three in the placebo group; none were thought to be definitely or probably related to the study interventions. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that pioglitazone at the doses studied here is unlikely to modify progression in early Parkinson's disease. Further study of pioglitazone in a larger trial in patients with Parkinson's disease is not recommended. FUNDING: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Authors: Sotirios A Parashos; Sheng Luo; Kevin M Biglan; Ivan Bodis-Wollner; Bo He; Grace S Liang; G Webster Ross; Barbara C Tilley; Lisa M Shulman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Sotirios A Parashos; Christopher J Swearingen; Kevin M Biglan; Ivan Bodis-Wollner; Grace S Liang; G Webster Ross; Barbara C Tilley; Lisa M Shulman Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-07-13
Authors: Ines Pagel-Langenickel; Jianjun Bao; Joshua J Joseph; Daniel R Schwartz; Benjamin S Mantell; Xiuli Xu; Nalini Raghavachari; Michael N Sack Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Eva Pirogovsky; Dawn M Schiehser; Irene Litvan; Kristalyn M Obtera; Mathes M Burke; Stephanie L Lessig; David D Song; Lin Liu; J Vincent Filoteo Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: M Flint Beal; David Oakes; Ira Shoulson; Claire Henchcliffe; Wendy R Galpern; Richard Haas; Jorge L Juncos; John G Nutt; Tiffini Smith Voss; Bernard Ravina; Clifford M Shults; Karen Helles; Victoria Snively; Mark F Lew; Brian Griebner; Arthur Watts; Shan Gao; Emmanuelle Pourcher; Louisette Bond; Katie Kompoliti; Pinky Agarwal; Cherissa Sia; Mandar Jog; Linda Cole; Munira Sultana; Roger Kurlan; Irene Richard; Cheryl Deeley; Cheryl H Waters; Angel Figueroa; Ani Arkun; Matthew Brodsky; William G Ondo; Christine B Hunter; Joohi Jimenez-Shahed; Alicia Palao; Janis M Miyasaki; Julie So; James Tetrud; Liza Reys; Katharine Smith; Carlos Singer; Anita Blenke; David S Russell; Candace Cotto; Joseph H Friedman; Margaret Lannon; Lin Zhang; Edward Drasby; Rajeev Kumar; Thyagarajan Subramanian; Donna Stuppy Ford; David A Grimes; Diane Cote; Jennifer Conway; Andrew D Siderowf; Marian Leslie Evatt; Barbara Sommerfeld; Abraham N Lieberman; Michael S Okun; Ramon L Rodriguez; Stacy Merritt; Camille Louise Swartz; W R Wayne Martin; Pamela King; Natividad Stover; Stephanie Guthrie; Ray L Watts; Anwar Ahmed; Hubert H Fernandez; Adrienna Winters; Zoltan Mari; Ted M Dawson; Becky Dunlop; Andrew S Feigin; Barbara Shannon; Melissa Jill Nirenberg; Mattson Ogg; Samuel A Ellias; Cathi-Ann Thomas; Karen Frei; Ivan Bodis-Wollner; Sofya Glazman; Thomas Mayer; Robert A Hauser; Rajesh Pahwa; April Langhammer; Ranjit Ranawaya; Lorelei Derwent; Kapil D Sethi; Buff Farrow; Rajan Prakash; Irene Litvan; Annette Robinson; Alok Sahay; Maureen Gartner; Vanessa K Hinson; Samuel Markind; Melisa Pelikan; Joel S Perlmutter; Johanna Hartlein; Eric Molho; Sharon Evans; Charles H Adler; Amy Duffy; Marlene Lind; Lawrence Elmer; Kathy Davis; Julia Spears; Stephanie Wilson; Maureen A Leehey; Neal Hermanowicz; Shari Niswonger; Holly A Shill; Sanja Obradov; Alex Rajput; Marilyn Cowper; Stephanie Lessig; David Song; Deborah Fontaine; Cindy Zadikoff; Karen Williams; Karen A Blindauer; Jo Bergholte; Clara Schindler Propsom; Mark A Stacy; Joanne Field; Dragos Mihaila; Mark Chilton; Ergun Y Uc; Jeri Sieren; David K Simon; Lauren Kraics; Althea Silver; James T Boyd; Robert W Hamill; Christopher Ingvoldstad; Jennifer Young; Karen Thomas; Sandra K Kostyk; Joanne Wojcieszek; Ronald F Pfeiffer; Michel Panisset; Monica Beland; Stephen G Reich; Michelle Cines; Nancy Zappala; Jean Rivest; Richard Zweig; L Pepper Lumina; Colette Lynn Hilliard; Stephen Grill; Marye Kellermann; Paul Tuite; Susan Rolandelli; Un Jung Kang; Joan Young; Jayaraman Rao; Maureen M Cook; Lawrence Severt; Karyn Boyar Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Christine R Swanson; Valerie Joers; Viktoriya Bondarenko; Kevin Brunner; Heather A Simmons; Toni E Ziegler; Joseph W Kemnitz; Jeffrey A Johnson; Marina E Emborg Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: Dan Lindholm; Johanna Mäkelä; Valentina Di Liberto; Giuseppa Mudò; Natale Belluardo; Ove Eriksson; Mart Saarma Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 9.261