Sotirios A Parashos1, Sheng Luo2, Kevin M Biglan3, Ivan Bodis-Wollner4, Bo He2, Grace S Liang5, G Webster Ross6, Barbara C Tilley2, Lisa M Shulman7. 1. Struthers Parkinson's Center, Golden Valley, Minnesota. 2. Division of Biostatistics, University of Texas at Houston. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 4. State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn. 5. The Parkinson's Institute and Clinical Center, Sunnyvale, California. 6. VA Pacific Islands Health Care System, Honolulu, Hawaii. 7. Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Optimizing assessments of rate of progression in Parkinson disease (PD) is important in designing clinical trials, especially of potential disease-modifying agents. OBJECTIVE: To examine the value of measures of impairment, disability, and quality of life in assessing progression in early PD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Inception cohort analysis of data from 413 patients with early, untreated PD who were enrolled in 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trials. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 treatments (67 received creatine, 66 received minocycline, 71 received coenzyme Q10, 71 received GPI-1485, and 138 received placebo). We assessed the association between the rates of change in measures of impairment, disability, and quality of life and time to initiation of symptomatic treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time between baseline assessment and need for the initiation of symptomatic pharmaceutical treatment for PD was the primary indicator of disease progression. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline confounding variables with regard to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II score, the UPDRS Part III score, the modified Rankin Scale score, level of education, and treatment group, we assessed the rate of change for the following measurements: the UPDRS Part II score; the UPDRS Part III score; the Schwab and England Independence Scale score (which measures activities of daily living); the Total Functional Capacity scale; the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, summary index, and activities of daily living subscale; and version 2 of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Summary and Mental Summary. Variables reaching the statistical threshold in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model using time to symptomatic treatment as the dependent variable. More rapid change (ie, worsening) in the UPDRS Part II score (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.22] for 1 scale unit change per 6 months), the UPDRS Part III score (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.13] for 1 scale unit change per 6 months), and the Schwab and England Independence Scale score (hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.12-1.48] for 5 percentage point change per 6 months) was associated with earlier need for symptomatic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: AND RELEVANCE In early PD, the UPDRS Part II score and Part III score and the Schwab and England Independence Scale score can be used to measure disease progression, whereas the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire and summary index, Total Functional Capacity scale, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Summary and Mental Summary are not sensitive to change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00063193 and NCT00076492.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Optimizing assessments of rate of progression in Parkinson disease (PD) is important in designing clinical trials, especially of potential disease-modifying agents. OBJECTIVE: To examine the value of measures of impairment, disability, and quality of life in assessing progression in early PD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Inception cohort analysis of data from 413 patients with early, untreated PD who were enrolled in 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trials. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 treatments (67 received creatine, 66 received minocycline, 71 received coenzyme Q10, 71 received GPI-1485, and 138 received placebo). We assessed the association between the rates of change in measures of impairment, disability, and quality of life and time to initiation of symptomatic treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time between baseline assessment and need for the initiation of symptomatic pharmaceutical treatment for PD was the primary indicator of disease progression. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline confounding variables with regard to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II score, the UPDRS Part III score, the modified Rankin Scale score, level of education, and treatment group, we assessed the rate of change for the following measurements: the UPDRS Part II score; the UPDRS Part III score; the Schwab and England Independence Scale score (which measures activities of daily living); the Total Functional Capacity scale; the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, summary index, and activities of daily living subscale; and version 2 of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Summary and Mental Summary. Variables reaching the statistical threshold in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model using time to symptomatic treatment as the dependent variable. More rapid change (ie, worsening) in the UPDRS Part II score (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.22] for 1 scale unit change per 6 months), the UPDRS Part III score (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.13] for 1 scale unit change per 6 months), and the Schwab and England Independence Scale score (hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.12-1.48] for 5 percentage point change per 6 months) was associated with earlier need for symptomatic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: AND RELEVANCE In early PD, the UPDRS Part II score and Part III score and the Schwab and England Independence Scale score can be used to measure disease progression, whereas the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire and summary index, Total Functional Capacity scale, and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Summary and Mental Summary are not sensitive to change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00063193 and NCT00076492.
Authors: Jordan J Elm; Christopher G Goetz; Bernard Ravina; Kathleen Shannon; George Fredrick Wooten; Caroline M Tanner; Yuko Y Palesch; Peng Huang; Paulo Guimaraes; Cornelia Kamp; Barbara C Tilley; Karl Kieburtz Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Connie Marras; Michael P McDermott; Ken Marek; Paula Rochon; Gary Naglie; Caroline M Tanner; Alice Rudolph; Ira Shoulson; Anthony E Lang Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Sotirios A Parashos; Christopher J Swearingen; Kevin M Biglan; Ivan Bodis-Wollner; Grace S Liang; G Webster Ross; Barbara C Tilley; Lisa M Shulman Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-07-13
Authors: Lisa M Shulman; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Karen E Anderson; Christopher G Vaughan; Stephen G Reich; Paul S Fishman; William J Weiner Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: M P McDermott; J Jankovic; J Carter; S Fahn; S Gauthier; C G Goetz; L I Golbe; W Koller; A E Lang; C W Olanow Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1995-06
Authors: Christopher H Gibbons; David K Simon; Meilin Huang; Barbara Tilley; Michael J Aminoff; Jacquelyn L Bainbridge; Matthew Brodsky; Roy Freeman; John Goudreau; Robert W Hamill; Sheng T Luo; Carlos Singer; Aleksandar Videnovic; Ivan Bodis-Wollner; Pei S Wong Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Lisa A Riesberg; Stephanie A Weed; Thomas L McDonald; Joan M Eckerson; Kristen M Drescher Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: Guangwei Du; Tian Liu; Mechelle M Lewis; Lan Kong; Yi Wang; James Connor; Richard B Mailman; Xuemei Huang Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Ju-Hee Kang; Brit Mollenhauer; Christopher S Coffey; Jon B Toledo; Daniel Weintraub; Douglas R Galasko; David J Irwin; Vivianna Van Deerlin; Alice S Chen-Plotkin; Chelsea Caspell-Garcia; Teresa Waligórska; Peggy Taylor; Nirali Shah; Sarah Pan; Pawel Zero; Mark Frasier; Kenneth Marek; Karl Kieburtz; Danna Jennings; Caroline M Tanner; Tanya Simuni; Andrew Singleton; Arthur W Toga; Sohini Chowdhury; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Lu He; Eun-Young Lee; Nicholas W Sterling; Lan Kong; Mechelle M Lewis; Guangwei Du; Paul J Eslinger; Xuemei Huang Journal: J Parkinsons Dis Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 5.568