Literature DB >> 26115962

Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere.

Marie Schäfer1, Daniel B M Haun2, Michael Tomasello3.   

Abstract

Distributing the spoils of a joint enterprise on the basis of work contribution or relative productivity seems natural to the modern Western mind. But such notions of merit-based distributive justice may be culturally constructed norms that vary with the social and economic structure of a group. In the present research, we showed that children from three different cultures have very different ideas about distributive justice. Whereas children from a modern Western society distributed the spoils of a joint enterprise precisely in proportion to productivity, children from a gerontocratic pastoralist society in Africa did not take merit into account at all. Children from a partially hunter-gatherer, egalitarian African culture distributed the spoils more equally than did the other two cultures, with merit playing only a limited role. This pattern of results suggests that some basic notions of distributive justice are not universal intuitions of the human species but rather culturally constructed behavioral norms.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; cross-cultural differences; distributive justice; equity; morality; peer interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26115962     DOI: 10.1177/0956797615586188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  15 in total

Review 1.  Why developmental psychology is incomplete without comparative and cross-cultural perspectives.

Authors:  Mark Nielsen; Daniel Haun
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Developmental Differences in Infants' Fairness Expectations From 6 to 15 Months of Age.

Authors:  Talee Ziv; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-11-21

4.  The influence of cooperation and competition on preschoolers' prosociality toward in-group and out-group members.

Authors:  Theo Toppe; Susanne Hardecker; Franca Zerres; Daniel B M Haun
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Give Me a Chance! Sense of Opportunity Inequality Affects Brain Responses to Outcome Evaluation in a Social Competitive Context: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Changquan Long; Qian Sun; Shiwei Jia; Peng Li; Antao Chen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  On the evolutionary origins of equity.

Authors:  Stéphane Debove; Nicolas Baumard; Jean-Baptiste André
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preschoolers Favor Their Ingroup When Resources Are Limited.

Authors:  Kristy Jia Jin Lee; Gianluca Esposito; Peipei Setoh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-19

8.  Hai||om children mistrust, but do not deceive, peers with opposing self-interests.

Authors:  Roman Stengelin; Robert Hepach; Daniel B M Haun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Merit overrules theory of mind when young children share resources with others.

Authors:  James Stack; Carlos Romero-Rivas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Finding Purpose in the Conservation of Biodiversity by the Commingling of Science and Ethics.

Authors:  John A Vucetich; Ewan A Macdonald; Dawn Burnham; Jeremy T Bruskotter; Dominic D P Johnson; David W Macdonald
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.