| Literature DB >> 26110380 |
Miao An1,2, Liyan Zeng3, Ticao Zhang4,5, Yang Zhong6,7.
Abstract
Thlaspi arvense is a well-known annual farmland weed with worldwide distribution, which can be found from sea level to above 4000 m high on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). In this paper, a phylogeographic history of T. arvense including 19 populations from China was inferred by using three chloroplast (cp) DNA segments (trnL-trnF, rpl32-trnL and rps16) and one nuclear (n) DNA segment (Fe-regulated transporter-like protein, ZIP). A total of 11 chloroplast haplotypes and six nuclear alleles were identified, and haplotypes unique to the QTP were recognized (C4, C5, C7 and N4). On the basis of molecular dating, haplotypes C4, C5 and C7 have separated from others around 1.58 Ma for cpDNA, which corresponds to the QTP uplift. In addition, this article suggests that the T. arvense populations in China are a mixture of diverged subpopulations as inferred by hT/vT test (hT ≤ vT, cpDNA) and positive Tajima's D values (1.87, 0.05 < p < 0.10 for cpDNA and 3.37, p < 0.01 for nDNA). Multimodality mismatch distribution curves and a relatively large shared area of suitable environmental conditions between the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) as well as the present time recognized by MaxEnt software reject the sudden expansion population model.Entities:
Keywords: MaxEnt; Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; admixture; molecular dating; population structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26110380 PMCID: PMC4490498 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160613339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Sampling information, haplotypes and frequencies, nucleotide diversity (π) and haplotype diversity (Hd) of 19 Thlaspi arvense populations.
| Code | Locality (All in China) | Long. | Lat. | Alt. | cpDNA | nDNA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (E) | (N) | (m) | Chloroplast Haplotypes (No.) | π | Hd | Nuclear Alleles (No.) | π | Hd | ||
| LZ | Bujiu, Tibet | 94°24ʹ | 29°28ʹ | 2985 | C1(2), C2(3) | 0.00115 | 0.600 | N1(5) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| MRK | Maerkang, Sichuan | 102°42ʹ | 31°46ʹ | 3180 | C1(3), C2(1), C6(4), C9(1), C10(1) | 0.00106 | 0.800 | N1(2), N3(8) | 0.00145 | 0.356 |
| LH | Luhuo, Sichuan | 100°43ʹ | 31°36ʹ | 3447 | C1(2), C2(3), C4(1), C5(1), C9(3) | 0.00162 | 0.844 | N1(2), N3(9) | 0.00133 | 0.327 |
| KJ * | Kajun, Sichuan | 98°27ʹ | 29°43ʹ | 3806 | C1(4), C6(4), C8(1) | 0.00037 | 0.667 | N1(1), N3(4) | 0.00091 | 0.222 |
| TB | Tuoba, Sichuan | 97°29ʹ | 31°22ʹ | 3751 | C1(2), C2(4), C5(1), C9(2), C11(1) | 0.00133 | 0.822 | N1(3), N3(7), N4(1) | 0.00198 | 0.564 |
| XN | Xining,Qinghai | 101°45ʹ | 36°38ʹ | 2245 | C1(2), C2(18), C5(3) | 0.00084 | 0.379 | N1(8), N3(11), N5(1) | 0.00214 | 0.563 |
| LT | Litang, Sichuan | 100°19ʹ | 29°52ʹ | 4045 | C1(2), C2(3), C4(2), C6(1), C9(2) | 0.00176 | 0.867 | N1(3), N3(7) | 0.00190 | 0.467 |
| KD | Kangding, Sichuan | 101°57ʹ | 29°57ʹ | 3180 | C1(3), C4(1), C5(1), C6(4), C7(1) | 0.00133 | 0.800 | N1(2), N3(5), N4(2) | 0.00204 | 0.667 |
| LL * | Lulang, Tibet | 94°43ʹ | 29°43ʹ | 3436 | C1(2), C2(6), C5(3) | 0.00147 | 0.655 | N1(6), N3(4), N4(1) | 0.00226 | 0.618 |
| NLM | Nyalam, Tibet | 85°58ʹ | 28°9ʹ | 3763 | C1(12), C2(1) | 0.00030 | 0.154 | N1(8) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| MR * | MangRe, Tibet | 89°44ʹ | 29°42ʹ | 4406 | C1(10) | 0.00000 | 0.000 | N1(10) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| JD * | Jiangda, Tibet | 93°4ʹ | 29°59ʹ | 3570 | C1(3), C2(3) | 0.00115 | 0.600 | N3(6) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| RT * | Ritu, Tibet | 79°38ʹ | 33°25ʹ | 4292 | C1(10), C5(7) | 0.00123 | 0.515 | N4(13) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| HF | Hefei, Anhui | 117°11ʹ | 31°52ʹ | 31 | C1(8), C2(12) | 0.00097 | 0.505 | N1(13) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| ZH | Zhanhai, Hebei | 115°24ʹ | 41°14ʹ | 1771 | C2(4), C9(6) | 0.00026 | 0.533 | N3(10) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| XA * | Xiʹan, Shannxi | 109°7ʹ | 34°1ʹ | 766 | C1(5), C2(5) | 0.00107 | 0.556 | N1(7) | 0.00000 | 0.000 |
| YL * | Yilan, Harbin | 129°34ʹ | 46°19ʹ | 101 | C1(19), C2(1) | 0.00019 | 0.100 | N1(17), N2(2) | 0.00041 | 0.199 |
| BX | Benxi, Liaoning | 123°47ʹ | 41°15ʹ | 284 | C1(1), C2(6), C3(3) | 0.00125 | 0.600 | N1(7), N2(2) | 0.00079 | 0.389 |
| FS | Fansi, Shanxi | 113°29ʹ | 39°3ʹ | 2063 | C1(7), C2(3) | 0.00090 | 0.467 | N1(3), N3(7) | 0.00190 | 0.467 |
| Total | C1~C11(224) | 0.00132 | 0.696 | N1~N6(210) | 0.00211 | 0.604 | ||||
Samples which were collected in the farmland are marked with asterisk (*).
Figure 1Haplotype distribution of cpDNA (A) and ZIP (B) in Thlaspi arvense. Pie charts show haplotype proportions in each population. Multimodality mismatch distribution curves of cpDNA and ZIP in the overall populations are shown in A1 and B1. The networks of the 11 chloroplast haplotypes and six nuclear alleles are shown in A2 and B2, separately. Black dots represent missing haplotypes.
Parameters of population diversity in all populations and those positioned at the eastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP).
| NST | GST | hT | vT | π | Hd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All populations | 0.285 | 0.235 | 0.719 | 0.721 | 0.00132 | 0.696 |
| Eastern edge of the QTP | 0.197 | 0.041 | 0.834 | 0.855 | 0.00151 | 0.831 |
| All populations | 0.565 | 0.560 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.00211 | 0.604 |
| Eastern edge of the QTP | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.00154 | 0.420 |
N/A: not applicable.
Figure 2Phylogenetic trees produced by Bayesian inference of cpDNA and ZIP of Thlaspi arvense are presented in (A) and (B) Numbers above the branches indicate the bootstrap values for ML/BI analyses. Dash lines represent bootstrap values that lower than 50 or posterior probabilities that lower than 90. The divergence times between T. arvense and outgroups referenced the work of Beilstein et al. [30] and were marked as stars. Star 1 indicates 38.4 Ma (33.2–45.0 Ma) and star 2 indicates 35.9 Ma (31.1–41.7 Ma). Inferred dates in Ma before present are given beside the nodes denoted with black dots. Stepwise uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (C) is adapted from Shi et al. [5].
Figure 3The present (red) and past distribution (blue) of T. arvense predicted through ecological niche modeling by the software MaxEnt3.3.3k. Only area with a predicted suitability above 50% is shown. Yellow represents the shared area of suitable environmental conditions of both the present and the past. Green dots represent the sampling records used for MaxEnt.