Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 CRISPR: Science can't solve it.

Literature DB >> 26108836

CRISPR: Science can't solve it.

Daniel Sarewitz¹.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2015 PMID： 26108836 DOI： 10.1038/522413a

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN： 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962

× No keyword cloud information.

5 in total

1. Scientists worry about some risks more than the public.

Authors: Dietram A Scheufele; Elizabeth A Corley; Sharon Dunwoody; Tsung-Jen Shih; Elliott Hillback; David H Guston
Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2007-11-25 Impact factor: 39.213

2. Don't edit the human germ line.

Authors: Edward Lanphier; Fyodor Urnov; Sarah Ehlen Haecker; Michael Werner; Joanna Smolenski
Journal: Nature Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 49.962

3. Epistemological depth in a GM crops controversy.

Authors: Daniel J Hicks
Journal: Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci Date: 2015-03-11

4. Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification.

Authors: David Baltimore; Paul Berg; Michael Botchan; Dana Carroll; R Alta Charo; George Church; Jacob E Corn; George Q Daley; Jennifer A Doudna; Marsha Fenner; Henry T Greely; Martin Jinek; G Steven Martin; Edward Penhoet; Jennifer Puck; Samuel H Sternberg; Jonathan S Weissman; Keith R Yamamoto
Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 47.728

5. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes.

Authors: Puping Liang; Yanwen Xu; Xiya Zhang; Chenhui Ding; Rui Huang; Zhen Zhang; Jie Lv; Xiaowei Xie; Yuxi Chen; Yujing Li; Ying Sun; Yaofu Bai; Zhou Songyang; Wenbin Ma; Canquan Zhou; Junjiu Huang
Journal: Protein Cell Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 14.870

5 in total

12 in total

1. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.

Authors: Nienke de Graeff; Karin R Jongsma; Josephine Johnston; Sarah Hartley; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 6.237

2. What we know about effective public engagement on CRISPR and beyond.

Authors: Dietram A Scheufele; Nicole M Krause; Isabelle Freiling; Dominique Brossard
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 11.205

3. Censorship: Beware scientists wielding red pens.

Authors: Bart Penders
Journal: Nature Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 49.962

4. Stakeholder Views of Nanosilver Linings: Macroethics Education and Automated Text Analysis Through Participatory Governance Role Play in a Workshop Format.

Authors: Joshua Dempsey; Justin Stamets; Kathleen Eggleson
Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 3.525

CRISPR: Science can't solve it.

1. Scientists worry about some risks more than the public.

2. Don't edit the human germ line.

3. Epistemological depth in a GM crops controversy.

4. Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification.

5. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes.

1. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.

2. What we know about effective public engagement on CRISPR and beyond.

3. Censorship: Beware scientists wielding red pens.

4. Stakeholder Views of Nanosilver Linings: Macroethics Education and Automated Text Analysis Through Participatory Governance Role Play in a Workshop Format.

5. CRISPR and the Rebirth of Synthetic Biology.

6. Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.

7. Trust in Science: CRISPR-Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.

8. "I bet you won't": The science-society wager on gene editing techniques.

9. Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology.

10. Restoring public trust in science with the help of the humanities.