Janet K Horton1, Rachel C Blitzblau2, Sua Yoo2, Joseph Geradts3, Zheng Chang2, Jay A Baker4, Gregory S Georgiade5, Wei Chen6, Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani2, Chunhao Wang2, Gloria Broadwater7, Jeff Groth3, Manisha Palta2, Mark Dewhirst2, William T Barry8, Eileen A Duffy2, Jen-Tsan A Chi9, E Shelley Hwang5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: janet.horton@duke.edu. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 6. Department of Bioinformatics: Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 7. Department of Biostatistics: Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 8. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Women with biologically favorable early-stage breast cancer are increasingly treated with accelerated partial breast radiation (PBI). However, treatment-related morbidities have been linked to the large postoperative treatment volumes required for external beam PBI. Relative to external beam delivery, alternative PBI techniques require equipment that is not universally available. To address these issues, we designed a phase 1 trial utilizing widely available technology to 1) evaluate the safety of a single radiation treatment delivered preoperatively to the small-volume, intact breast tumor and 2) identify imaging and genomic markers of radiation response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women aged ≥55 years with clinically node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, and/or progesterone receptor-positive HER2-, T1 invasive carcinomas, or low- to intermediate-grade in situ disease ≤2 cm were enrolled (n=32). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was used to deliver 15 Gy (n=8), 18 Gy (n=8), or 21 Gy (n=16) to the tumor with a 1.5-cm margin. Lumpectomy was performed within 10 days. Paired pre- and postradiation magnetic resonance images and patient tumor samples were analyzed. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. At a median follow-up of 23 months, there have been no recurrences. Physician-rated cosmetic outcomes were good/excellent, and chronic toxicities were grade 1 to 2 (fibrosis, hyperpigmentation) in patients receiving preoperative radiation only. Evidence of dose-dependent changes in vascular permeability, cell density, and expression of genes regulating immunity and cell death were seen in response to radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative single-dose radiation therapy to intact breast tumors is well tolerated. Radiation response is marked by early indicators of cell death in this biologically favorable patient cohort. This study represents a first step toward a novel partial breast radiation approach. Preoperative radiation should be tested in future clinical trials because it has the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm and provide a path forward to identify radiation response biomarkers.
PURPOSE:Women with biologically favorable early-stage breast cancer are increasingly treated with accelerated partial breast radiation (PBI). However, treatment-related morbidities have been linked to the large postoperative treatment volumes required for external beam PBI. Relative to external beam delivery, alternative PBI techniques require equipment that is not universally available. To address these issues, we designed a phase 1 trial utilizing widely available technology to 1) evaluate the safety of a single radiation treatment delivered preoperatively to the small-volume, intact breast tumor and 2) identify imaging and genomic markers of radiation response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women aged ≥55 years with clinically node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, and/or progesterone receptor-positive HER2-, T1 invasive carcinomas, or low- to intermediate-grade in situ disease ≤2 cm were enrolled (n=32). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was used to deliver 15 Gy (n=8), 18 Gy (n=8), or 21 Gy (n=16) to the tumor with a 1.5-cm margin. Lumpectomy was performed within 10 days. Paired pre- and postradiation magnetic resonance images and patienttumor samples were analyzed. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. At a median follow-up of 23 months, there have been no recurrences. Physician-rated cosmetic outcomes were good/excellent, and chronic toxicities were grade 1 to 2 (fibrosis, hyperpigmentation) in patients receiving preoperative radiation only. Evidence of dose-dependent changes in vascular permeability, cell density, and expression of genes regulating immunity and cell death were seen in response to radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative single-dose radiation therapy to intact breast tumors is well tolerated. Radiation response is marked by early indicators of cell death in this biologically favorable patient cohort. This study represents a first step toward a novel partial breast radiation approach. Preoperative radiation should be tested in future clinical trials because it has the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm and provide a path forward to identify radiation response biomarkers.
Authors: Ivo A Olivotto; Timothy J Whelan; Sameer Parpia; Do-Hoon Kim; Tanya Berrang; Pauline T Truong; Iwa Kong; Brandy Cochrane; Alan Nichol; Isabelle Roy; Isabelle Germain; Mohamed Akra; Melanie Reed; Anthony Fyles; Theresa Trotter; Francisco Perera; Wayne Beckham; Mark N Levine; Jim A Julian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Silvia C Formenti; Howard Hsu; Maria Fenton-Kerimian; Daniel Roses; Amber Guth; Gabor Jozsef; Judith D Goldberg; J Keith Dewyngaert Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Chirag Shah; J Ben Wilkinson; Thomas Lanni; Maha Jawad; Jessica Wobb; Ashley Fowler; Michelle Wallace; Peter Chen; Inga S Grills; Frank Vicini Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Rachel Y Lei; Charles E Leonard; Kathryn T Howell; Phyllis L Henkenberns; Timothy K Johnson; Tracy L Hobart; Shannon P Fryman; Jane M Kercher; Jodi L Widner; Terese Kaske; Dennis L Carter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jayant S Vaidya; Frederik Wenz; Max Bulsara; Jeffrey S Tobias; David J Joseph; Mohammed Keshtgar; Henrik L Flyger; Samuele Massarut; Michael Alvarado; Christobel Saunders; Wolfgang Eiermann; Marinos Metaxas; Elena Sperk; Marc Sütterlin; Douglas Brown; Laura Esserman; Mario Roncadin; Alastair Thompson; John A Dewar; Helle M R Holtveg; Steffi Pigorsch; Mary Falzon; Eleanor Harris; April Matthews; Chris Brew-Graves; Ingrid Potyka; Tammy Corica; Norman R Williams; Michael Baum Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D Tiberi; P Vavassis; D Nguyen; M C Guilbert; A Simon-Cloutier; P Dubé; M K Gervais; L Sideris; G Leblanc; T Hijal; M P Dufresne; M Yassa Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: K Guidolin; B Yaremko; K Lynn; S Gaede; A Kornecki; G Muscedere; I BenNachum; O Shmuilovich; M Mouawad; E Yu; T Sexton; N Gelman; V Moiseenko; M Brackstone; M Lock Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Chirag Shah; Martin Keisch; Atif Khan; Douglas Arthur; David Wazer; Frank Vicini Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Brahma Natarajan; Daphna Spiegel; Elizabeth M Nichols; Steven Feigenberg; Rachel Blitzblau; Gloria Broadwater; Eileen A Duffy; Jay A Baker; Janet K Horton Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Casey Liveringhouse; Austin Sim; Kosj Yamoah; Michael Poch; Richard B Wilder; Julio Pow-Sang; Peter A S Johnstone Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2021-04-14